by Darth Vader » Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:04 pm
by Gravel » Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:14 pm
by Royal City » Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:27 pm
Hondo wrote:It was very different back then. The first AFL team in Adelaide. Lots of neutrals and bandwagonners. People would stand on their seats when watching (well, I did). It was sensational in those early days. Tickets would sell out two weeks in advance. Now 75% of the crowd have sat in their same seats for 20 years and sometimes you can hear a pin drop and 10,000 people with tickets don't even turn up! Dropping PAFC wouldn't automatically return us to those early days.
That's not the issue here though. It's how much better has the SANFL gone since it had 22 AFL home games instead of 11? This is despite the money they've had to kick back into the PAFC. Catering revenue even from a 20,000 crowd would be huge.
by Booney » Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:37 pm
by Hondo » Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:41 pm
Royal City wrote:If the PAFC so important to the crows future. Can I ask why are the crows crowds dropping off now with PAFC's presence in the AFL currently ?????
by CENTURION » Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:44 pm
Hondo wrote:Royal City wrote:If the PAFC so important to the crows future. Can I ask why are the crows crowds dropping off now with PAFC's presence in the AFL currently ?????
I don't think there'd be an automatic uplift in Crows crowds if there was no Port Adelaide. The main problem for Crows crowds is existing ticket holders not turning up. Why would they turn up if Port didn't exist?
Why people aren't going to AAMI Stadium anymore is a whole other debate. The AFL think it's the stadium itself (it's age and location). I think that's part of it but not the whole story.
You'd need a bigger stadium and a very popular Crows to make up the revenue if we lost 11 AFL home games x average 25000 attendance (or whatever Port get this year).
by Gravel » Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:50 pm
by CENTURION » Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:36 pm
by Royal City » Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:44 pm
Hondo wrote:Royal City wrote:If the PAFC so important to the crows future. Can I ask why are the crows crowds dropping off now with PAFC's presence in the AFL currently ?????
I don't think there'd be an automatic uplift in Crows crowds if there was no Port Adelaide. The main problem for Crows crowds is existing ticket holders not turning up. Why would they turn up if Port didn't exist?
by Royal City » Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:47 pm
Gravel wrote:I believe there are a number of reasons why AFL fans are not going to AAMI stadium.
- Live TV against the gate unless a sellout, or a 20 minute delay - this did not occur when the last Stadium deal was inked -
The AFL time slots - the 12.40 and 16.40 sunday games have never been popular and SA cops more than its share
- AAMI is on the nose - surveys show that gen Y are not going due to its location and the majority of existing AAMI members / attendees now want a city based stadium
- The AFL clubs not winning - bandwagoners probably inflated the early Crows and Port attendances and these are the first to fall away
- Game plans - Many Crows and Port fans refuse to go to watch chipping, flooding and kicking backwards etc.
by Hondo » Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:26 pm
Royal City wrote:If you love watching AFL and one club has a monoploy on the market ???? Guess who you need to go and watch to see the AFl brand.
If Crows season ticket holders keep refusing to rock up and you have other fans willing to not only purchase a season ticket, but they will also guartantee 100% attendance. The Crows just need to place a minimum amount of games per year you are required to attend to be automaticllay assured your season ticket gets renewed.
Not hard when you take the blinkers off mate.
by CENTURION » Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:29 pm
by Hondo » Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:37 pm
by CENTURION » Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:42 pm
Hondo wrote:We have an asset we own freehold (AAMI Stadium) and you guys want to rip half it's AFL games away from it every season. WTF else do we do with the Stadium to generate the same revenue? Run a craft fair maybe? Sexpo?
by Hondo » Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:46 pm
CENTURION wrote:Hondo wrote:We have an asset we own freehold (AAMI Stadium) and you guys want to rip half it's AFL games away from it every season. WTF else do we do with the Stadium to generate the same revenue? Run a craft fair maybe? Sexpo?
now you're thinking laterally! but you didn't answer my question.
by CENTURION » Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:49 pm
Hondo wrote:CENTURION wrote:Hondo wrote:We have an asset we own freehold (AAMI Stadium) and you guys want to rip half it's AFL games away from it every season. WTF else do we do with the Stadium to generate the same revenue? Run a craft fair maybe? Sexpo?
now you're thinking laterally! but you didn't answer my question.
If the SANFL can't get 2 AFL teams working successfully in a traditional footy state then there is something wrong and the AFL will step in and do it for us. It's the number one sport in Australia with a $1b TV rights deal coming up.
You're question is speculation and speculation is feeding the beast here. It's like saying what would the SANFL do if West Lakes and the Adelaide CBD sunk in an earthquake.
by Royal City » Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:06 pm
CENTURION wrote:Hondo wrote:CENTURION wrote:Hondo wrote:We have an asset we own freehold (AAMI Stadium) and you guys want to rip half it's AFL games away from it every season. WTF else do we do with the Stadium to generate the same revenue? Run a craft fair maybe? Sexpo?
now you're thinking laterally! but you didn't answer my question.
If the SANFL can't get 2 AFL teams working successfully in a traditional footy state then there is something wrong and the AFL will step in and do it for us. It's the number one sport in Australia with a $1b TV rights deal coming up.
You're question is speculation and speculation is feeding the beast here. It's like saying what would the SANFL do if West Lakes and the Adelaide CBD sunk in an earthquake.
no it's not, what we're talking about is on the brink of happening. we dont have the population to sustain 2 teams.
by Royal City » Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:15 pm
Hondo wrote:Royal City wrote:If you love watching AFL and one club has a monoploy on the market ???? Guess who you need to go and watch to see the AFl brand.
If Crows season ticket holders keep refusing to rock up and you have other fans willing to not only purchase a season ticket, but they will also guartantee 100% attendance. The Crows just need to place a minimum amount of games per year you are required to attend to be automaticllay assured your season ticket gets renewed.
Not hard when you take the blinkers off mate.
The Crows games are mostly sold out already. There's no more tickets left. All you achieve by dropping PAFC is you take 25000 x 11 games out of the SANFL's catering revenue.
Great![]()
Your solution is to twist the arm of the 10000 Crows and SANFL members fans with tickets who don't go every week and hope they go. 25000 > 10000. 2.5 times as much. If Port's crowds ever drop to below 15000 regularly and you can guarantee you'll get 50000 to every Crows game then you're on to somehting .... maybe
by Darth Vader » Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:18 pm
by beenreal » Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:42 pm
Darth Vader wrote:I think if Victoria's population can support 10 teams we should surely be able to support two. The problem you guys are missing or avoiding is the whole Port Adelaide thing. Unless you grew up to barrack for them you were taught to hate them. They forced there way onto the national stage and now they can suffer. The only time I barrack for Collingwood is when they play Ports and I know plenty of blokes in my little footy club who do the same.
The second team should have been headquartered at say Norwood Oval and called Eastern Suburbs or East Adelaide or something. Then people who were neutral to the Crows - could have jumped onboard Easts. Crows had a healthy support base among Alberton people who probably would have stayed true. It would have worked because it was emotion-neutral
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |