by dedja » Thu Jan 06, 2011 2:20 pm
by bayman » Thu Jan 06, 2011 2:22 pm
Dutchy wrote:That was clearly Watson's fault, for a start they didnt run the first hard so it ruled out the 2nd, secondly it was Hughes's call but Watson made it and kept running.Why even look for the second if your not running the first one hard?
Thats the main reason Watson will never be a great player, no feel or nous for the game (at least at Test Match level)
by mal » Thu Jan 06, 2011 2:22 pm
Dutchy wrote:That was clearly Watson's fault, for a start they didnt run the first hard so it ruled out the 2nd, secondly it was Hughes's call but Watson made it and kept running.Why even look for the second if your not running the first one hard?
Thats the main reason Watson will never be a great player, no feel or nous for the game (at least at Test Match level)
by Ronnie » Thu Jan 06, 2011 2:27 pm
by Dutchy » Thu Jan 06, 2011 2:31 pm
mal wrote:Dutchy wrote:That was clearly Watson's fault, for a start they didnt run the first hard so it ruled out the 2nd, secondly it was Hughes's call but Watson made it and kept running.Why even look for the second if your not running the first one hard?
Thats the main reason Watson will never be a great player, no feel or nous for the game (at least at Test Match level)
Can you edit the last sentence
You have posted WATSON , should read HUGHES
NSW 2/60
by bayman » Thu Jan 06, 2011 2:32 pm
Ronnie wrote:I realise there are many areas of concern but why is Tim Nielson almost invisible in all this?
Not his fault that his contract gets extended so far into the future though.
by Jim05 » Thu Jan 06, 2011 2:57 pm
bayman wrote:Ronnie wrote:I realise there are many areas of concern but why is Tim Nielson almost invisible in all this?
Not his fault that his contract gets extended so far into the future though.
can't blame the coach if you haven't got the cattle.....would john buchanan do any better with this present group ?
by CoverKing » Thu Jan 06, 2011 2:59 pm
Jim05 wrote:bayman wrote:Ronnie wrote:I realise there are many areas of concern but why is Tim Nielson almost invisible in all this?
Not his fault that his contract gets extended so far into the future though.
can't blame the coach if you haven't got the cattle.....would john buchanan do any better with this present group ?
He can start by picking the right cattle
by stampy » Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:01 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:03 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:07 pm
stampy wrote:nielsen and digger have to go, as for the playing side of things, hughes is there by default - the sooner we can find a young opener who is making runs at shield level the better, clark on his last chance for me, if he doesnt make a century in this dig well ta ta, bring in white and make him skipper batting at 6, the new boy to stay at 3 drop punter to 4, huss 5 smith onya bike and make some big runs at domestic level, hadds 7, mummys boy 8, ,now we need to invewst some time in a spinner and in this day and age he needs to be able to handle a bat, am open to suggestions on who it is, 10 siddle, 11 - dunno if hilfy is the answer, i feel he isnt - if p george was a blue he would be a shoe in
by mal » Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:09 pm
by Jim05 » Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:15 pm
CoverKing wrote:Jim05 wrote:bayman wrote:Ronnie wrote:I realise there are many areas of concern but why is Tim Nielson almost invisible in all this?
Not his fault that his contract gets extended so far into the future though.
can't blame the coach if you haven't got the cattle.....would john buchanan do any better with this present group ?
He can start by picking the right cattle
No idea. How can he pick the right cattle??
by dedja » Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:19 pm
by stampy » Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:22 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:stampy wrote:nielsen and digger have to go, as for the playing side of things, hughes is there by default - the sooner we can find a young opener who is making runs at shield level the better, clark on his last chance for me, if he doesnt make a century in this dig well ta ta, bring in white and make him skipper batting at 6, the new boy to stay at 3 drop punter to 4, huss 5 smith onya bike and make some big runs at domestic level, hadds 7, mummys boy 8, ,now we need to invewst some time in a spinner and in this day and age he needs to be able to handle a bat, am open to suggestions on who it is, 10 siddle, 11 - dunno if hilfy is the answer, i feel he isnt - if p george was a blue he would be a shoe in
As bias as I am towards picking SA boys, I don't think he's up to it yet, probably 3rd or 4th in line. Hilfy is no good if he doesn't strike early.
England are just a far better team than us, they bowl in partnerships and to plans, they bat with patience. It pains me to say it because I've always seen us belt the poms.
by CoverKing » Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:30 pm
by dedja » Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:34 pm
by CoverKing » Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:36 pm
dedja wrote:Then there's something wrong with the farms that breed the cattle ...
by locky801 » Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:38 pm
CoverKing wrote:dedja wrote:Then there's something wrong with the farms that breed the cattle ...
Too much international cricket, t20 taking over and international players not playing more SS cricket
by JK » Thu Jan 06, 2011 3:38 pm
CoverKing wrote:Too much international cricket, t20 taking over
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |