Merki the God wrote:helicopterking wrote:Bulls forever wrote:Merki the God wrote:Also why has Chad Sayers never really been given a chance at first class level? His record over the last few years would suggest that he should have at least been close.
Merki, I am with IO, what is going on, won't anyone answer your posts. But seeing you are talking some sense. Sayers had rookie contract with SACA and in the old 2nd 11 games, he took 7 wickets in the last one he played. Then lost his contract and hasn't been thought of since. Was very strange move, given he bowls genuine outswing at around 120-125. I think the selectors see this as the problem, no quite quick enough. Unfortunately with the new U23 format and only allowed 3 overage players, the chances of getting a game are nil for un contracted over 23 players, which is now is. I think from memory his birthday is a few days too early, anything after Sept 1 this year is the line for age. So irrespective of what we think, he will be confined to being an outstanding Grade cricketer.
From what ive been told, Sayers was told he was not tall enough to be a danger in state cricket. Gone are the days of a smart bowler!
But surely with the deadbacks results over the last few seasons being average at best, he would have had a crack. If he plays a couple of first class games and gets belted all over the place so be it, at least he's had a crack.
Merki, please......... stop making sense. How can you question the state selectors. They have a got a string of interstate rejects to consider before they start rewarding local boys for their performances in the Grade comp. Surely he is worth a try.