by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:22 pm
by catchit » Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:33 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:catchit wrote:
I judge cricketers on there next game, not a big fan of stats and wouldnt have a clue of my stats... your only as good as your next game, last weeks months years games mean nothing if you cant perform in the next game...
That's just a cliche mate, so Steve Waugh is crap because if he plays tomorrow he'll probably score sweet f.a? there comes a time where you think you can play on and be a number because you used to be good or you can bow out on a graceful note and allow a younger player the opportunity to take your spot.
by catchit » Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:39 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Personally i dont think you can always judge a person on stats, ive seen blokes who knock the ball around for 20 or 30 and share in big partnerships, and help set the team up. id rather take a bloke whose consistantly going to stick around and build a partnership than a bloke who might make a 100 or make nothing.
At the end of the day, stats don't lie mate, I've had a few good knocks in my time, a 209 run opening partnership in a 1 dayer, 3000+ runs for my club but at the end of the day I've only scored one century. I've had people praise my batting over the years but my one century sums it up perfectly, that's all I deserved, I wasn't and aren't a very good batsman.
Oz made 3 on the weekend, he'll probably fail again more than once this, it doesn't take away the fact that he's probably the most valuable wicket for a bowler in the PDCA still, he has an ultra-impressive record and the stats don't lie, same as Stama and Sibbs.
by catchit » Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:44 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:[quote="Phantom Gossiper"]Personally i dont think you can always judge a person on stats, ive seen blokes who knock the ball around for 20 or 30 and share in big partnerships, and help set the team up. id rather take a bloke whose consistantly going to stick around and build a partnership than a bloke who might make a 100 or make nothing.
by catchit » Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:30 pm
by Dogmatic » Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:32 pm
by Browny25 » Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:39 pm
catchit wrote:Here is a stat i like... Its very hard to chase down 290.... stats would prob prove that
by whufc » Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:45 pm
Browny25 wrote:catchit wrote:Here is a stat i like... Its very hard to chase down 290.... stats would prob prove that
Impossible to chase anything in 40+ degrees aswell!
by catchit » Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:51 pm
Browny25 wrote:catchit wrote:Here is a stat i like... Its very hard to chase down 290.... stats would prob prove that
Impossible to chase anything in 40+ degrees aswell!
by Masha » Wed Nov 24, 2010 9:03 pm
catchit wrote:Here is a stat i like... Its very hard to chase down 290.... stats would prob prove that
by Browny25 » Wed Nov 24, 2010 9:14 pm
Masha wrote:catchit wrote:Here is a stat i like... Its very hard to chase down 290.... stats would prob prove that
That's not a stat![]()
Here's a stat...in the last 4 victories that the Lodge have had over R & C, Sibbick has scored 296 runs at an average of 148 with 4 50's (98, 88 n.o, 52 and 58 n.o). In the 2 losses last year, he got 0 and 26.
I think the boys will go ok on Sat, if they get through the first 15-20 in good shape they'll bring home the choccies.
by Merki the God » Thu Nov 25, 2010 6:34 am
Masha wrote:catchit wrote:Here is a stat i like... Its very hard to chase down 290.... stats would prob prove that
That's not a stat![]()
Here's a stat...in the last 4 victories that the Lodge have had over R & C, Sibbick has scored 296 runs at an average of 148 with 4 50's (98, 88 n.o, 52 and 58 n.o). In the 2 losses last year, he got 0 and 26.
I think the boys will go ok on Sat, if they get through the first 15-20 in good shape they'll bring home the choccies.
by catchit » Thu Nov 25, 2010 6:52 am
Masha wrote:catchit wrote:Here is a stat i like... Its very hard to chase down 290.... stats would prob prove that
That's not a stat![]()
Here's a stat...in the last 4 victories that the Lodge have had over R & C, Sibbick has scored 296 runs at an average of 148 with 4 50's (98, 88 n.o, 52 and 58 n.o). In the 2 losses last year, he got 0 and 26.
I think the boys will go ok on Sat, if they get through the first 15-20 in good shape they'll bring home the choccies.
by catchit » Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:07 am
Masha wrote:catchit wrote:Here is a stat i like... Its very hard to chase down 290.... stats would prob prove that
That's not a stat![]()
Here's a stat...in the last 4 victories that the Lodge have had over R & C, Sibbick has scored 296 runs at an average of 148 with 4 50's (98, 88 n.o, 52 and 58 n.o). In the 2 losses last year, he got 0 and 26.
I think the boys will go ok on Sat, if they get through the first 15-20 in good shape they'll bring home the choccies.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:18 am
catchit wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:catchit wrote:
I judge cricketers on there next game, not a big fan of stats and wouldnt have a clue of my stats... your only as good as your next game, last weeks months years games mean nothing if you cant perform in the next game...
That's just a cliche mate, so Steve Waugh is crap because if he plays tomorrow he'll probably score sweet f.a? there comes a time where you think you can play on and be a number because you used to be good or you can bow out on a graceful note and allow a younger player the opportunity to take your spot.
I also should of added that stats prob should be looked at after retirement, thats when they count.. I am talking for myself here as i dont care what i made last week or last year, what is important is the next week to me. Sure its good to take confidence out of your last game into the next but as far as adding up the years stats before the year is out is a waste of time IMO..
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:34 am
by Honda07 » Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:57 am
by Executive Member » Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:13 am
Honda07 wrote:Hey LM, what odds for modes of dismissal and by what bowler for Sibbs??
by Executive Member » Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:14 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Just noticed our C's are playing at Salisbury North #2 next week, might have to get the whites out of the boot, it's been a life long dream to play on that ground
by Gunnerson » Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:20 am
Executive Member wrote:Honda07 wrote:Hey LM, what odds for modes of dismissal and by what bowler for Sibbs??
get on hit wicket as i think he has some contacts in Pakastain
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |