Para Districts Cricket Association 2010-11

[Lightning McQueen]

What is the min bet LM?

That's right, you've been away, you can start off with 100 cyber bucks as per everyone else mate. We'll see who the last one standing is or who made the most.

[Browny25]

25 on this then

Ozolins into Stama into Smithfield highest score first innings

[Lightning McQueen]

25 on this then

Ozolins into Stama into Smithfield highest score first innings

222 return.

[Phantom Gossiper]

$20 on Smithfield (win)- Stama (runs) - SW (highest score)

[Lightning McQueen]

$20 on Smithfield (win)- Stama (runs) - SW (highest score)

91.52

[Wizard of Oz]

I think Sibbs has come runner up a few times...

NO ONE in the past has taken votes off him, although Matt Hargreaves finished top 10 last year.

Browny is correct - heard rumours have come second but who knows as the votes are hidden. Would love for the count to be done on powerpoint pressentation so the umpires could be held accountable. Have never taken much notice since knowing Oz didnt get any votes for his 100.

205 not out and a 3 fa thanks.

Ha! That old chestnut

[Lightning McQueen]

205 not out and a 3 fa thanks.

Ha! That old chestnut

Had to check my facts first though.

[RedMagpie]

Can I jump on the Cyber bet late please?

[Groover]

$21 on Lodge, smiffies and groover thanks

currently $101
bet $21
total remaining $80


Also if catchit is willing to have a side bet with me for most 1st inns runs, loser buys first drink after the game.

[catchit]

$21 on Lodge, smiffies and groover thanks

currently $101
bet $21
total remaining $80


Also if catchit is willing to have a side bet with me for most 1st inns runs, loser buys first drink after the game.

Confidence groover? Love that sh!t....
Of course i will take you up on that jack daniels

[catchit]

50 on westies to win smith to win into ozlins most runs... cheers..

[catchit]

Stuff all i'd imagine

Come on browny you are in some good form and the umpires love you

Not as good as some

You seen me play enough to know I must have got lucky to get some wickets!

Some times it takes a lucky year to win one browny..

[Groover]

$21 on Lodge, smiffies and groover thanks

currently $101
bet $21
total remaining $80


Also if catchit is willing to have a side bet with me for most 1st inns runs, loser buys first drink after the game.

Confidence groover? Love that sh!t....
Of course i will take you up on that jack daniels

Nah not confident at all, just need an excuse to stay back for a drink Ill take a cider if you guys have any!

[Gunnerson]

I think Sibbs has come runner up a few times...

NO ONE in the past has taken votes off him, although Matt Hargreaves finished top 10 last year.

So he should of he is a class act, perhaps the only thing to be critical about is where he has batted? i would think that if Jamie batted at 3(where he should bat) he would more than likely have a Mckenzie medal? If a batsmen bats through the innings he is noticed alot more than someone who comes in later on maybe?

[custardarm]

100 on carman

[Gunnerson]

I think Sibbs has come runner up a few times...

NO ONE in the past has taken votes off him, although Matt Hargreaves finished top 10 last year.

Browny is correct - heard rumours have come second but who knows as the votes are hidden. Would love for the count to be done on powerpoint pressentation so the umpires could be held accountable. Have never taken much notice since knowing Oz didnt get any votes for his 100.

Oh there you are maybe you can tell me why Jamie doesnt bat at 3?

[whufc]

$50 on Lodge into Stamatavich.

[Honda07]

I think Sibbs has come runner up a few times...

NO ONE in the past has taken votes off him, although Matt Hargreaves finished top 10 last year.

Browny is correct - heard rumours have come second but who knows as the votes are hidden. Would love for the count to be done on powerpoint pressentation so the umpires could be held accountable. Have never taken much notice since knowing Oz didnt get any votes for his 100.

Oh there you are maybe you can tell me why Jamie doesnt bat at 3?

Maybe u are right. 10 run better batsman at 3 over career BUT i would love to see team results for each of these games. Have always felt teams were able to get on top of us once I was out and tried to spread myself across the innings. Not my call anymore which is nice. Just bat where I am told
Runs at batting position
BAT NUM INNINGS NOs 100s 50s DUCKS HS AGGREGATE AVERAGE
1 18 1 2 4 1 110 734 43.18
2 22 2 1 4 1 142 735 36.75
3 23 3 1 8 2 151 1051 52.55
4 65 8 3 12 5 129 2023 35.49
5 24 6 0 6 2 94 705 39.17
6 12 4 0 4 1 98 447 55.88
7 6 2 0 1 1 98 161 40.25
8 1 1 0 0 0 6* 6 NA
9 0 0 0 0 0 NA

[Honda07]

I think Sibbs has come runner up a few times...

NO ONE in the past has taken votes off him, although Matt Hargreaves finished top 10 last year.

Browny is correct - heard rumours have come second but who knows as the votes are hidden. Would love for the count to be done on powerpoint pressentation so the umpires could be held accountable. Have never taken much notice since knowing Oz didnt get any votes for his 100.

205 not out and a 3 fa thanks.

Well it wasnt that memorable to the umpire straight after the game when he was giving votes so how was I supposed to remember . Does anyone think it would actually make the end of year presso a bit more interesting if we knew there was going to be a count in gr 1 and 2 done on power point. Would only take 20 minutes if set up correctly and might actually get a few more people there.

[fineleg2fineleg]

You dont see Ozlins having a career in A Grade District either, its not what he wants to do. I Guarentee you that if he did want to further himself in cricket, he wouldn't be playing Para Districts. No one from OTH wants him to fail.

speak for yourself there OKC. i aint sayin i want him to fail but there could be players at the club who feel let down by matt rogers decision to leave the club n wudnt mind seein a couple of 0s next to his name.

the thing with matt rogers is simple. he isnt a club man, he plays for cricket himself. which is fine if thats how ya wanna play. some people make their careers on helping their club others make their careers on chasin personal goals. matt obviously thought he would be better off at OTH, then once he got there decided against it. perhaps a classic case of the grass is greener on the other side. but i reckon had he been sat on 200 runs and 10 wickets under his belt the situation could have been different. but like i said...matt rogers plays for matt rogers. he obviously has goals for the season and didnt think he was going to achieve them at OTH.

I personally am a little disappointed by it all. but like you said OKC at the start of the season he wasnt playin for us, it was a last minute job, and we all felt at the club that we could seriously push towards a flag... gaining matt was a bonus... so i guess now we go back to the same position we were at the start of the season. we will be there come finals time