RedMagpie wrote:Groover wrote:20/20 round 1 results:
OTH 129 def rosies 127
Sals west 8/107 def BL 7/106
Who made runs?
Nice hitting today big Red, shame we couldn't say the same about your catching

by Masha » Sun Nov 07, 2010 4:15 pm
RedMagpie wrote:Groover wrote:20/20 round 1 results:
OTH 129 def rosies 127
Sals west 8/107 def BL 7/106
Who made runs?
by catchit » Sun Nov 07, 2010 4:46 pm
ibowlpies wrote:catchit wrote:Should wearing a helmot in grade 1 be compulsory?
turn it up mate, helmets are for sissy'snever worn 1 even against bowlers far quicker than jim. still probably says something about my questionable mental state
and why my head has more stitches than a pair of levi's.
by catchit » Sun Nov 07, 2010 4:56 pm
by catchit » Sun Nov 07, 2010 4:58 pm
catchit wrote:was that guy serious at appealing for ball handling today in the brahma west game??? surely thats not cricket???
yest i was running to non striker end and the throw came in wide of the stumps i stuck my hand out to stop it as there was no chance of a over throw or running me out, but i missed it... was then told by the umpire lucky i didnt cause if i did and they appealled ( which i am sure they wouldnt of) he would have to give me out.. i am sure west would of fired up at that bloke if he got the wicket that way..
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Nov 07, 2010 5:27 pm
RedMagpie wrote:Groover wrote:20/20 round 1 results:
OTH 129 def rosies 127
Sals west 8/107 def BL 7/106
Who made runs?
by catchit » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:07 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:RedMagpie wrote:Groover wrote:20/20 round 1 results:
OTH 129 def rosies 127
Sals west 8/107 def BL 7/106
Who made runs?
More important than the win hey?
by Browny25 » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:12 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:20 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:22 pm
ibowlpies wrote:catchit wrote:Should wearing a helmot in grade 1 be compulsory?
turn it up mate, helmets are for sissy'snever worn 1 even against bowlers far quicker than jim. still probably says something about my questionable mental state
and why my head has more stitches than a pair of levi's.
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:24 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:25 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:SmithyOTH wrote:my money was on creedy with the cyber bets. i bowled him long enough and he bowled a cracking spell. Took 2 wickets with a great catch from mcnair in 2nd slip.
scott and myself took 3 each and hannisch took 2.
![]()
LOL USELESS!!! There goes my 10 cyber dollars
by RedMagpie » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:31 pm
Masha wrote:RedMagpie wrote:Groover wrote:20/20 round 1 results:
OTH 129 def rosies 127
Sals west 8/107 def BL 7/106
Who made runs?
Nice hitting today big Red, shame we couldn't say the same about your catching
by SmithyOTH » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:33 pm
sports follower wrote:SmithyOTH wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:SmithyOTH wrote:hahaha, what a crazy little critter
Who got wickets for ya? please say creedy took a bag
my money was on creedy with the cyber bets. i bowled him long enough and he bowled a cracking spell. Took 2 wickets with a great catch from mcnair in 2nd slip.
scott and myself took 3 each and hannisch took 2.
How did A Brook go today Smithy?
by catchit » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:35 pm
by catchit » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:37 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:A nice day out at Salisbury West yesterday, Smithfield were struggling at 6/55 before they put together a couple of handy partnerships to get to 135, McInnes 7/22 off over 20 overs, must've bowled 40 yorkers.
Too many of Smithfield's batsmen tried big shots too early in their innings and paid the ultimate penalty, it took a 16 y.o debutant to knuckle down with Morris to get to a respectable total.
Westies are 1/16.........15 extras........woeful.
by SmithyOTH » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:38 pm
broca011 wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:I believe OTH were rolled for around 120 or so and rolled PG for half that
went down and watch this game for a few hours. tbh some of the most average batting from 2 sides (except for 1 bloke for the billies who hit 50 odd)... bowling looked to be nothing more than padestrian other than Cree who seemed to bowl with good wheels and very accurate. Neither side seemed to have any batsman willing to spend time at the crease and wait for the bad ball.
if this is the quality of these two sides then both will stuggle to stay up... Cree will do damage with the ball but needs more help from the other end with the new ball but both sides certainly need to find something with the bat.
by RedMagpie » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:42 pm
catchit wrote:Why should sibb appealled?
by SmithyOTH » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:44 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:A few bets are looking redundant, Smithy, could've told me Rogers is only a week two player.
by Lightning McQueen » Sun Nov 07, 2010 6:59 pm
catchit wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:A nice day out at Salisbury West yesterday, Smithfield were struggling at 6/55 before they put together a couple of handy partnerships to get to 135, McInnes 7/22 off over 20 overs, must've bowled 40 yorkers.
Too many of Smithfield's batsmen tried big shots too early in their innings and paid the ultimate penalty, it took a 16 y.o debutant to knuckle down with Morris to get to a respectable total.
Westies are 1/16.........15 extras........woeful.
15 extras wtf?
by catchit » Sun Nov 07, 2010 7:03 pm
RedMagpie wrote:catchit wrote:Why should sibb appealled?
He was the only other fielder to make something of it. It wasn't really up to just him, anyone could have gone up, Just stirring him up that is all.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |