Wizard of Oz wrote:He'll make 1000 this season.
How did your A grade go today?
by Phantom Gossiper » Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:38 pm
Wizard of Oz wrote:He'll make 1000 this season.
by Iwasthere84 » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:18 pm
by OKC! » Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:26 pm
duck-mann wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Heard Angle Vale all out for 98, OTH all out 99?
Smithfield all out 101, Rose & Crown 2/31 at stumps.
i havent heard anything from them yet but I hope thats not the case!!! not a grade 1 score!!!
by sports follower » Sun Oct 24, 2010 7:51 am
duck-mann wrote:Just returned from the S.North vs Craigmore game. Managed to get there at the right time this afternoon.. The old war-horse Rob Howe batting with, undoubtably Craigmores future star, Shaun Baker... both on 70odd and making batting look VERY easy. Absolute pleasure to be there when Dobbo made yet another ton, and young Shaun making his first ever 100. Great moment for all members of CCC and a privilege for those who were there to see it.
All I can say is good luck to S.North, you gonna need it chasing down what would have to be a target of 350+ (Papas to clarify that score)
by duck-mann » Sun Oct 24, 2010 9:01 am
sports follower wrote:
I can confirm Craigmore 7/351 yesterday.
Howe with century number 17 for Craigmore didnt give a chance all day until he passed his ton. Shaun Baker backed up his 75 last game for 1st ton and ended up on 120 and got dropped early in slip and he made Salisbury North pay. Was a great batting performance by the boys today and like Duck-Mann said it was a pleasure to watch.
Salisbury North had a few missing like Joss but you still need to make the runs.
by Papas » Sun Oct 24, 2010 9:40 am
by whufc » Sun Oct 24, 2010 10:30 am
by SmithyOTH » Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:02 pm
OKC! wrote:duck-mann wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Heard Angle Vale all out for 98, OTH all out 99?
Smithfield all out 101, Rose & Crown 2/31 at stumps.
i havent heard anything from them yet but I hope thats not the case!!! not a grade 1 score!!!
Can confirm that was the score.... 5/74 to 9/77, 22 run stand by no 10 & 11 to win the game in the last over.
Terrible batting by both sides.
by catchit » Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:08 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Sun Oct 24, 2010 2:32 pm
catchit wrote:All I can say is jim has "demanded "the new ball in the second dig, love him being at square leg when oppisition sides are teeing off.. Fired up? New ball? Ouch!!
by Phantom Gossiper » Sun Oct 24, 2010 2:38 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Sun Oct 24, 2010 2:41 pm
RedMagpie wrote:Kidding yourself mate, Wills and Hanson will post 100's and we will be chasing something in the vacinity of 300, young McConnel to post up some runs also.
by Wizard of Oz » Sun Oct 24, 2010 3:21 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Wizard of Oz wrote:He'll make 1000 this season.
How did your A grade go today?
by Wizard of Oz » Sun Oct 24, 2010 3:22 pm
catchit wrote:All I can say is jim has "demanded "the new ball in the second dig, love him being at square leg when oppisition sides are teeing off.. Fired up? New ball? Ouch!!
by catchit » Sun Oct 24, 2010 3:52 pm
Wizard of Oz wrote:catchit wrote:All I can say is jim has "demanded "the new ball in the second dig, love him being at square leg when oppisition sides are teeing off.. Fired up? New ball? Ouch!!
So Smithfield were on the chirp after being knocked over for a hundred ?
by catchit » Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:21 pm
by Groover » Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:23 pm
catchit wrote:here is one i havnt seen... jimmy bowling to number 10 batsmen for smithfield, ball beats the bat, there is a deflection and the keeper has to quickly go to his right to stop the ball, next thing we look and the bail is on the ground,so we appeal and umpire walks down and says he has to give the benefit of the doubt, being brand new stumps there was also a little cherry on the outside of the off stump, not out was the decision... didnt make anf diff to the game as jim knocked the same stump 12 mtrs back 2 balls later, was just curious on the decision??
by manbitesdog » Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:30 pm
catchit wrote:here is one i havnt seen... jimmy bowling to number 10 batsmen for smithfield, ball beats the bat, there is a deflection and the keeper has to quickly go to his right to stop the ball, next thing we look and the bail is on the ground,so we appeal and umpire walks down and says he has to give the benefit of the doubt, being brand new stumps there was also a little cherry on the outside of the off stump, not out was the decision... didnt make anf diff to the game as jim knocked the same stump 12 mtrs back 2 balls later, was just curious on the decision??
by whufc » Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:51 pm
by sports follower » Sun Oct 24, 2010 7:22 pm
whufc wrote:Only lowlight from our game on the weekend was the performance of an experienced Atco player.
While he batted very very very well and played some really good shots, running down the pitch after hitting them yelling things like, "Oh what a shot", "Oh my god thats another six", "Here we go again thats gonna go as well" is extremly toolish and made him look like a joke, especially considering most of them were played of kids that were 16-17 years old.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |