by hearts on fire » Mon Sep 20, 2010 6:53 pm
by mal » Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:45 pm
by the big bang » Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:28 am
mal wrote:Anyone backing SK at the points be wary
2009 GRAND FINAL
SK were +7 at the points
GE kick a goal after the siren with no SK player manning the goalsquare
Defenders had walked off the ground
That goal made the + points punters lose
2010 PRELIM FINAL
the points betting was at about -28 for SK over WB
SK had 5 players on the Interchange late in the game
HAHN took a mark on the final siren
HAHN kicked a goal that no one saw
Once again the SK defenders left the field
That goal made the points punters lose as the final margin was 24 points
QUESTION
Could a SK defender have stopped that kick if on the goaline ???????????????????
As 4 Lyon having 5 guys on the Interchange what a goose
By playing one short you are by odds definition denying the ball to the SK players
Made more sense to play 18 on the ground gain possesion and kick it sideways and backwards
A gamestyle tactic perfected under Lyon
To beat CO , SK will need to deny CO the ball and possess it
That will be side kicks, back kicks, short forward kicks
Mess up the spectacle and win
If they take on CO and attack they might get flogged
The side that gets an early lead of 2-3 goals will win this
by The Lethal 1 » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:34 am
the big bang wrote:mal wrote:Anyone backing SK at the points be wary
2009 GRAND FINAL
SK were +7 at the points
GE kick a goal after the siren with no SK player manning the goalsquare
Defenders had walked off the ground
That goal made the + points punters lose
2010 PRELIM FINAL
the points betting was at about -28 for SK over WB
SK had 5 players on the Interchange late in the game
HAHN took a mark on the final siren
HAHN kicked a goal that no one saw
Once again the SK defenders left the field
That goal made the points punters lose as the final margin was 24 points
QUESTION
Could a SK defender have stopped that kick if on the goaline ???????????????????
As 4 Lyon having 5 guys on the Interchange what a goose
By playing one short you are by odds definition denying the ball to the SK players
Made more sense to play 18 on the ground gain possesion and kick it sideways and backwards
A gamestyle tactic perfected under Lyon
To beat CO , SK will need to deny CO the ball and possess it
That will be side kicks, back kicks, short forward kicks
Mess up the spectacle and win
If they take on CO and attack they might get flogged
The side that gets an early lead of 2-3 goals will win this
i see where you're coming from mate, but i rekon at that point he was more thinking about preservation of players legs and less chance of injury.
by Mr Beefy » Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:16 am
Adelaide Hawk wrote:hawks21 wrote:According to what Nettlefold was told, had the Saints finished above the Magpies it would have been St Kilda's right to play in their traditional jumper.
But Collingwood do not have a marked alternative to their black and white stripes and, according to president Eddie McGuire, will not entertain the thought of one.
This has led to considerable angst in the past and a degree of bemusement at other clubs where changes have been demanded.
Yep. Another glaring example of how some clubs have far more pull than others, and the incredible double standards of the AFL.
by the big bang » Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:41 am
Mr Beefy wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:hawks21 wrote:According to what Nettlefold was told, had the Saints finished above the Magpies it would have been St Kilda's right to play in their traditional jumper.
But Collingwood do not have a marked alternative to their black and white stripes and, according to president Eddie McGuire, will not entertain the thought of one.
This has led to considerable angst in the past and a degree of bemusement at other clubs where changes have been demanded.
Yep. Another glaring example of how some clubs have far more pull than others, and the incredible double standards of the AFL.
It is one of the few times I agree with anything Collingwood does, I think kudos to the pies for standing up to the AFL and not changing their jumper. If you can't see a big red panel on the saints jumper then bad luck.
by Mr Beefy » Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:17 am
the big bang wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:hawks21 wrote:According to what Nettlefold was told, had the Saints finished above the Magpies it would have been St Kilda's right to play in their traditional jumper.
But Collingwood do not have a marked alternative to their black and white stripes and, according to president Eddie McGuire, will not entertain the thought of one.
This has led to considerable angst in the past and a degree of bemusement at other clubs where changes have been demanded.
Yep. Another glaring example of how some clubs have far more pull than others, and the incredible double standards of the AFL.
It is one of the few times I agree with anything Collingwood does, I think kudos to the pies for standing up to the AFL and not changing their jumper. If you can't see a big red panel on the saints jumper then bad luck.
as Sir Eddie once said....
"If all 15 other clubs have alternate guernseys, then we don't need one"
by Interceptor » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:01 pm
by best on hill » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:05 pm
Interceptor wrote:Had to post this:
"109 Magnificant years of near glory"
http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/go-pies-the-punch-tribute-to-109-years-of-almost-winning?from=newscomau
by Media Park » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:13 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Gingernuts » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:21 pm
by Q. » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:35 pm
by White Line Fever » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:40 pm
Quichey wrote:And on the other side of the coin you have the Saints, who've struggled to even get to the big dance.
by valleys07 » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:54 pm
White Line Fever wrote:Quichey wrote:And on the other side of the coin you have the Saints, who've struggled to even get to the big dance.
Either way it's gonna be good.
by White Line Fever » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:59 pm
valleys07 wrote:White Line Fever wrote:Quichey wrote:And on the other side of the coin you have the Saints, who've struggled to even get to the big dance.
Either way it's gonna be good.
Agreed, the scenes of jubilation at 5pm saturday are going to be massive regardless of the victor......cant wait!
by Voice » Wed Sep 22, 2010 5:32 pm
Gingernuts wrote:Gees. Never knew they'd lost so many!
by Q. » Wed Sep 22, 2010 5:51 pm
by Hondo » Wed Sep 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Quichey wrote:I wonder how many times they were the underdogs, like in 2002/3
by Gingernuts » Wed Sep 22, 2010 6:25 pm
Voice wrote:Gingernuts wrote:Gees. Never knew they'd lost so many!
Played 41 I think and won 14 with one draw. Out of their last 20 GF's they've only won 3!
by The Jack » Wed Sep 22, 2010 6:35 pm
Quichey wrote:I wonder how many times they were the underdogs, like in 2002/3
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |