Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

All discussions to do with the SANFL
User avatar
White Line Fever
League - Top 5
Posts: 2896
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:22 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 26 times
Been thanked: 16 times
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by White Line Fever »

hot dogs wrote:James Sellar continues to be a major disappointment. He appears to be slow, awkward and cumbersome, both in his movement and his decision making. I know the old chesnut of ' Big men take longer to develop' is constantly applied to him, but with his supposed potential, he continues to be a fringe dweller, waiting for someone else to grab the game and take it on.


He was terrible and deserves the gary Coleman for his dummy spits at the umps.
spell_check
Coach
Posts: 18872
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:26 pm
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 258 times
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by spell_check »

I also heard something on ABCTV today. Ok, correct me if I'm going down the wrong path with this, but I heard in the effects mike "that's bulls**t Josh". I'm sure it was one of the umpires - in particular Corey Bowen - saying that to Carr. If that's what it was, you could either class it as a relic of the past - a bit of banter between umpire and player. Or a remark which confirms that nowadays the umpires are trying to be bigger than the match. I'd like to think it was the former.
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
Posts: 11376
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:41 am
Team: Central District
Team: Western Bulldogs
Team: Salisbury
Location: Burnside, 5066
Has thanked: 341 times
Been thanked: 172 times
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by CENTURION »

purch wrote:
Pseudo wrote:
purch wrote:Plus, going on the way the Eags played today, the annual finals choker chain has been well and truly fitted to the necks of the Tigers...and ever so slightly tightened...

Going on the way the Eagles played last week, I think Sturt has a better claim to the chokers tag that the Bays. Argue the point all you wish, but it remains that you and your tribe are the ones who will be watching next week's finals from your lounge rooms.


And argue that I will...completely different story today pseudo. Welsh, Hentshel and Grocke in. Giles (the best SANFL ruckman in 2010 IMO) out early for the Blues...a flat track instead of the bogs we've played so well on in the past month. As I have said, Sturt's season went pear shaped months ago...Plus - the Eagles were just bloody good today. Hard at the man and the ball. Our blokes dropped their heads a bit after missing relatively easy shots on goal early in the game...let's hope that's not the fate of the Bays next week. Will Grima have his kicking boots on? I guess it won't matter if he hardly gets a kick :lol: In contrast, the Bays were sitting top 2 weeks ago, with a huge winning streak and have now lost 2 on the trot.

How's the neck chaffing? ;) Black and yellow scarves tend to do that this time of year...
Simple, STURT are FINISHED, Glenelg live to play another day.
And yes I already have plenty to look forward to in the off season. Mark Webber for the 2010 F1 WC!
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
bayman
Coach
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:42 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Plympton
Location: home
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by bayman »

mal wrote:1/4 time
GL 0-0
NW 2-4
NW finally got some reward
Matthew Fuller got on the end of some fine play and kicks a goal
Whatta time for Matt to kick his first goal in SANFL footy in only his 9th game

GL had about 2 entries inside 50 for the qtr
PANNOZZO and MILLS were outstanding in keeping NW at ''bay''
Great to see Bryce CAMPBELL throwing his body into the clinches
GAGS and LOWER were dynamite around the packs

GL defended well, but were fortunate not be be much further behind



stop watching the replay & giving us a summary ;)
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
HeartBeatsTrue
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1194
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:54 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Pooraka
Been thanked: 5 times
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by HeartBeatsTrue »

Disappointed we didn't win by 96 points today.
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:46 pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 218 times

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by topsywaldron »

Dogwatcher wrote:And, tbh, playing it all year is one thing, not going into your shell and losing that rythm in the heat of finals is another.


And also tbh our ability to do that today surprised me.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
csbowes
League - Best 21
Posts: 1632
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Alma
Been thanked: 77 times
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by csbowes »

Poor effort from Glenelg today... watching the match I thought Glenelg simply pulled a "Sturt", mucking about, kicking sideways and every way but towards a player who would do something with it. The Bays threw the game away in the first half, much like Sturt, but at least made a last ditch effort in the last, but just couldn't really get in reach to really worry the Legs.

For me, I'm not confident Glenelg will bounce back. The Eagles have been played into form by my rabble and it's going to take some real guts and determination from Glenelg to get over them. At the same time, I'm loathe to follow Norwood, but lets face it, apart from Doggies supporters, no one really wants to go through the boredom of ANOTHER Central premiership, but it is shaping up that way.

Anyway, stunning effort Norwood, just superb today.

Glenelg, piss weak. Considering where you were on the table, its even more woeful than my lot I'm afraid.
User avatar
Columbo
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1045
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 7:37 pm
Team: Eagles
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Adelaide
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 29 times
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by Columbo »

spell_check wrote:I also heard something on ABCTV today. Ok, correct me if I'm going down the wrong path with this, but I heard in the effects mike "that's bulls**t Josh". I'm sure it was one of the umpires - in particular Corey Bowen - saying that to Carr. If that's what it was, you could either class it as a relic of the past - a bit of banter between umpire and player. Or a remark which confirms that nowadays the umpires are trying to be bigger than the match. I'd like to think it was the former.

Personally I would much rather the umps give the player a gob full back after a comment from a player than have them pay a 25M penalty for backchat...they are all big boys...suck it up and play on...just my opinion though!
Trust the process.
Dogwatcher
Coach
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:59 am
Team: Central District
Team: Collingwood
Team: Elizabeth
Location: The Bronx
Has thanked: 1425 times
Been thanked: 1153 times
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by Dogwatcher »

Agreed.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
User avatar
purch
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1351
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:09 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Hawthorn
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by purch »

CENTURION wrote:
purch wrote:
Pseudo wrote:
purch wrote:Plus, going on the way the Eags played today, the annual finals choker chain has been well and truly fitted to the necks of the Tigers...and ever so slightly tightened...

Going on the way the Eagles played last week, I think Sturt has a better claim to the chokers tag that the Bays. Argue the point all you wish, but it remains that you and your tribe are the ones who will be watching next week's finals from your lounge rooms.


And argue that I will...completely different story today pseudo. Welsh, Hentshel and Grocke in. Giles (the best SANFL ruckman in 2010 IMO) out early for the Blues...a flat track instead of the bogs we've played so well on in the past month. As I have said, Sturt's season went pear shaped months ago...Plus - the Eagles were just bloody good today. Hard at the man and the ball. Our blokes dropped their heads a bit after missing relatively easy shots on goal early in the game...let's hope that's not the fate of the Bays next week. Will Grima have his kicking boots on? I guess it won't matter if he hardly gets a kick :lol: In contrast, the Bays were sitting top 2 weeks ago, with a huge winning streak and have now lost 2 on the trot.

How's the neck chaffing? ;) Black and yellow scarves tend to do that this time of year...
Simple, STURT are FINISHED, Glenelg live to play another day.
And yes I already have plenty to look forward to in the off season. Mark Webber for the 2010 F1 WC!


You are making a habit of misquoting people. Poor form on your part...bottom drawer Centurion...
"And look at John Halbert"
" His whiskers have curled."
spell_check
Coach
Posts: 18872
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:26 pm
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 258 times
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by spell_check »

Columbo wrote:
spell_check wrote:I also heard something on ABCTV today. Ok, correct me if I'm going down the wrong path with this, but I heard in the effects mike "that's bulls**t Josh". I'm sure it was one of the umpires - in particular Corey Bowen - saying that to Carr. If that's what it was, you could either class it as a relic of the past - a bit of banter between umpire and player. Or a remark which confirms that nowadays the umpires are trying to be bigger than the match. I'd like to think it was the former.

Personally I would much rather the umps give the player a gob full back after a comment from a player than have them pay a 25M penalty for backchat...they are all big boys...suck it up and play on...just my opinion though!


So do I actually. Nothing out of hand mind you about it, just a bit of banter. I was only saying I think that some may use that term "they are bigger than the game" from this.

That didn't help Ken Aplin all those years ago, though!
csbowes
League - Best 21
Posts: 1632
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Alma
Been thanked: 77 times
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by csbowes »

How many Qualifying Final losers have gone on to (a) make the grannie and (b) win it?
User avatar
fish
Coach
Posts: 6908
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:58 pm
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 48 times
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by fish »

JAS wrote:
baggy8 wrote:
topcat10 wrote:And the lowest qualifying final score EVER :shock:

But let's be fair to them - they did kick 5.9.39 not 5.8.38 as they got a point right on the siren


thanks for pointing that out...apologies...must have missed it in the final siren chaos of 2 forums and texts. Opening post duly amended.

Regards
JAS

JAS - Norwood now have two chances to make the Grand Final. If they make it will you be making the trip over to watch them?
User avatar
JAS
Coach
Posts: 12431
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 7:52 pm
Team: Norwood
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by JAS »

fish wrote:JAS - Norwood now have two chances to make the Grand Final. If they make it will you be making the trip over to watch them?


Nah...the plan has always been to celebrate my 50th next year by watching my first live Legs game so sticking with that.

Regards
JAS
You can't be a pirate if you don't have a beard. I said so. MY boat, MY rules.

We haven't got a plank. Just ******* jump


Trust no one The truth is everyone is going to let you down you eventually
mal
Coach
Posts: 32312
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:15 pm
Has thanked: 2710 times
Been thanked: 2994 times
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by mal »

Congratulations are in order for James Gallagher
Daddy during the week
By now the kid would be as tall
User avatar
fish
Coach
Posts: 6908
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:58 pm
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 48 times
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by fish »

JAS wrote:
fish wrote:JAS - Norwood now have two chances to make the Grand Final. If they make it will you be making the trip over to watch them?


Nah...the plan has always been to celebrate my 50th next year by watching my first live Legs game so sticking with that.

Regards
JAS

Did you say first live Legs game?
User avatar
JAS
Coach
Posts: 12431
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 7:52 pm
Team: Norwood
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by JAS »

fish wrote:
JAS wrote:
fish wrote:JAS - Norwood now have two chances to make the Grand Final. If they make it will you be making the trip over to watch them?


Nah...the plan has always been to celebrate my 50th next year by watching my first live Legs game so sticking with that.

Regards
JAS

Did you say first live Legs game?


Well yeh...never been to Oz so never been to a Legs game. Seen them on dvd etc though.

So things here don't go off topic there is a thread for my trip to Adelaide in the Travel Forum...look for Op Wombat.

regards
JAS
You can't be a pirate if you don't have a beard. I said so. MY boat, MY rules.

We haven't got a plank. Just ******* jump


Trust no one The truth is everyone is going to let you down you eventually
HeartBeatsTrue
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1194
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:54 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Pooraka
Been thanked: 5 times
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by HeartBeatsTrue »

csbowes wrote:How many Qualifying Final losers have gone on to (a) make the grannie and (b) win it?

Yeah good one you know the answer it was once by sturt in 76. Just stick to reflecting on your clubs pi$$ poor season rather than reflect on past glories hours after the season is finished.
purch wrote:That said, play them in the mud and they are vulnerable..
Good thing finals aren't played in the mud hey?


If we play the bays again this year I will expect a much tougher game from them.
sapaul
League - Best 21
Posts: 2118
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 4:31 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: South Whyalla
Location: Whyalla
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by sapaul »

Pseudo wrote:I think Sturt has a better claim to the chokers tag that the Bays.


Not even close.

viewtopic.php?f=30&t=30117
Last edited by sapaul on Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
spell_check
Coach
Posts: 18872
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:26 pm
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 258 times
Contact:

Re: Qual Final Norwood v Glenelg Reviews

Post by spell_check »

csbowes wrote:How many Qualifying Final losers have gone on to (a) make the grannie and (b) win it?


a) 6 b) 1

Make it: North in 1973, South in 1979, Sturt in 1983, Eagles in 2005, Sturt in 2009

Win it: Sturt in 1976
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 245 guests