cennals05 wrote:Dutchy wrote:Interesting that Pumpa is sledging on the Snouts forum...classy
and I'm sure it's really him.
He has admitted it
by Dutchy » Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:43 pm
cennals05 wrote:Dutchy wrote:Interesting that Pumpa is sledging on the Snouts forum...classy
and I'm sure it's really him.
by Dirko » Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:48 pm
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:57 pm
SJABC wrote:Definitely Pumpa. You can tell by his lack of pronunciation and spelling errors.
by jim5112 » Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:41 am
stampy wrote:Big Phil wrote:Central turned the ball over at half back with NO PLAYERS AT ALL behind the ball (in the Tigers forward line) where Glenelg pushed the ball inside their 50 with a 2 on 1, Sibenaler being the 1.
Glenelg looked as though they were in a very strong position to score and after sprinting about 200m at full pace against 2 Glenelg opponents, Sibenaler put on a desperate smother on an Alex Grima kick inside the Bays 50.
As Roy Laird said back at presentations, it is things like that as to why the club is happy to fly Evil down to be back in the league side.
crikey! didnt know elizabeth oval was that long, what is it phil, 500 or so metres long according to your story
by jim5112 » Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:50 am
smac wrote:therisingblues wrote:The Dogs are very hard to beat at Elizabeth late in the season.
When's the last time the Dogs were beaten at their home ground after about round 13 (or the last third of the season)?
North beat us by about 2 points a in '07 (?) late in the season.
by jim5112 » Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:55 am
am Bays wrote:whufc wrote:Really great game of local football yesterday.
Both side were ultra competitive, theres no way you could say one team was more committed than another.
I thought Havelberg was the difference between the sides his ability to take a few grabs when no one else could even pick the ball up. On Thursday i wouldnt have been to disappointed had he been dropped, once again i was wrong and Lairdys faith in him paid off big time.
Sutherland was great as well, and loved his 'pumpa' of the fists to the bays supporters after the game. He was probably the best big man on the ground and showed why Central rushed him back into the side.
For the Bays, Allan was great, my favourite opposition player to watch, his toughness and ability to win the hard ball is currently the best in the SANFL.
Loved the end tiff with Gowans vs Carr, there will be a sequel no doubt.
Yep whilst the results havn't thrilled me since June 2008 I always enjoy Dogs v Bays clashes - two decent sides ahving a crack with no quarter asked or given. Respect the way the Dogs play their footy.
by therisingblues » Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:02 am
jim5112 wrote:smac wrote:therisingblues wrote:The Dogs are very hard to beat at Elizabeth late in the season.
When's the last time the Dogs were beaten at their home ground after about round 13 (or the last third of the season)?
North beat us by about 2 points a in '07 (?) late in the season.
We've lost quite a few actually.
North in 2006 round 22;
Port in 2003 round 21;
Norwood in 2002 eound 17;
Eagles in 2001 round 13;
Sturt in 2000 round 17
by cennals05 » Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:47 am
85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:SJABC wrote:Definitely Pumpa. You can tell by his lack of pronunciation and spelling errors.
plus the post said he thought Pumpa had played a fantastic game and beaten Trev hands down at his own game![]()
Only Pumpa or his Mum would have written that![]()
Maybe as a mark of respect for his ties at GFC we should suspend his Snouts account til after finals to stop him getting into any more trouble with Laird due to his over-inflated ego
by mal » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:08 am
by Dutchy » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:41 am
by Dirko » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:42 am
Dutchy wrote:Warren Dogland cant write any crap about how we are deadset favourites for the flag
by Big Phil » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:56 am
Dutchy wrote:Disappointing result, but not unexpected, no one wins at Elizabeth and esp in those conditions that suit the Dogs style.
The positive is we are not the hunted this year, we can sneak up on the Dogs not vice versa, and also Warren Dogland cant write any crap about how we are deadset favourites for the flag
by Royal City » Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:09 pm
dedja wrote:Royal City wrote:fish wrote:baysman wrote:Big big concerns for the Bays with Bode, Mules, Tenace and Rudolph looking to have serious injuries.
Any updates on these injuries?
All reports of leather poisioning have come back negative.
Well deserved win to Central but most people would be able to appreciate that having only 1 on the bench to play with for over a half doesn't help much in those conditions, and then 2 others on the ground in the last quarter who shouldn't have been out there.
by Dogwatcher » Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:12 pm
by tigersupporter » Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:17 pm
85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:SJABC wrote:Definitely Pumpa. You can tell by his lack of pronunciation and spelling errors.
plus the post said he thought Pumpa had played a fantastic game and beaten Trev hands down at his own game![]()
Only Pumpa or his Mum would have written that![]()
Maybe as a mark of respect for his ties at GFC we should suspend his Snouts account til after finals to stop him getting into any more trouble with Laird due to his over-inflated ego
by tigersupporter » Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:19 pm
maxyoz wrote:dedja wrote:Big Phil wrote:Any update on the Bays fan who had a heart attack in the car park post-game?
Not sure of the result but from what I saw it didn't look good at all.
We can only hope the best for the gentleman in question.
We left the ground at about 5.20pm - also parked in the school - they were just placing the gentleman into the Ambulance at that stage. From what I could gather, he had stabilised somewhat and was being taken to hospital. But I know nothing else - I did not know the person either, not that I know all Glenelg supporters.
It was good to see the turn out yesterday and as one Doggie supprter said to me at half time, anybody who was there yesterday were true supporters of their club. And great to see a Westies supporter there as well.
Didn't get to meet Centurion, but he did stand behind me for awhile, seemed like a good bloke, until Central started winning.
by tigersupporter » Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:20 pm
dedja wrote:maxyoz wrote:Didn't get to meet Centurion, but he did stand behind me for awhile, seemed like a good bloke, until Central started winning.
You mean after he ditched the pair with DD-cups?
by whufc » Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:21 pm
by Dogwatcher » Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:27 pm
tigersupporter wrote:dedja wrote:maxyoz wrote:Didn't get to meet Centurion, but he did stand behind me for awhile, seemed like a good bloke, until Central started winning.
You mean after he ditched the pair with DD-cups?
i believe your talking about my wife... and her best friend.....
by CENTURION » Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:39 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:tigersupporter wrote:dedja wrote:maxyoz wrote:Didn't get to meet Centurion, but he did stand behind me for awhile, seemed like a good bloke, until Central started winning.
You mean after he ditched the pair with DD-cups?
i believe your talking about my wife... and her best friend.....
Could be an interesting reply coming along here....
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |