Choccies wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:iscore and its on the SAAFL site
Right now I wish there was a spellcheck
Is that spelling or Grammar though?
by Iron Fist » Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:08 pm
Choccies wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:iscore and its on the SAAFL site
Right now I wish there was a spellcheck
by Footy Chick » Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:12 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Trader » Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:01 pm
Footy Chick wrote:You lot are more off track than an indian train![]()
Thank you to Trader for attempting to bring back some normality to the thread
by Jimmy_041 » Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:07 pm
Choccies wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:iscore and its on the SAAFL site
Right now, I wish there was a spellcheck
by finn » Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:23 pm
Iron Fist wrote:Choccies wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:iscore and its on the SAAFL site
Right now I wish there was a spellcheck
Is that spelling or Grammar though?
by Jimmy_041 » Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:25 pm
by Footy_Rulz » Fri Sep 03, 2010 6:43 pm
by teaoby » Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:01 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Fri Sep 03, 2010 7:36 pm
by on_the_pine » Fri Sep 03, 2010 8:58 pm
TEX07 wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Probably to make you look stupid - mission accomplished
That is not that hard to do jimmy! But seriously, why did PAOC apply for thier permit this week if they are not playing? What you put on iscore can change anyway cant it? If they have decided that playing them is not in good spirit then good on them, it was my point all along that just because you can do it does not mean you should. Now assuming they wont be playing both GGFC and PAOC can have a good even game of footy. Except FR is not playing! So I am not sure who benfeits from this more
by Trader » Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:47 pm
by Old Dog 13 » Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:58 pm
Trader wrote:Thebby was in great nick given the weather, good game too, always love a 1pt finish.
by Footy_Rulz » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:05 pm
by Trader » Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:13 pm
by Morrie » Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:05 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:27 pm
by on_the_pine » Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:29 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:Good onya FR - good luck next year and well done to your C4 side for their win
by Jimmy_041 » Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:57 pm
by TEX07 » Sun Sep 05, 2010 6:20 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:You're right - we could have agreed to use your umpire
We could have dropped the entire A Grade and still would have lost by 20 goals
by Who's Ball? » Sun Sep 05, 2010 6:54 pm
TEX07 wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:You're right - we could have agreed to use your umpire
We could have dropped the entire A Grade and still would have lost by 20 goals
After seeing these blokes playing D grade yesterday I now hope that SMOSH go out next week and abolutely smack PAOC off the park. They will not win without those guys who I see played well enough to get in the best, will we see them in your C grade next week Jimmy? Nah, think not. Straight back up to the top again i rekon dont you. You can say it is in the rules, blah blah blah, but you still didnt need to do it. I only hope the SAAFL looks at this rule next season and makes a change because I am sure this is not what they intended it to be used for. Well done to our boys for their efforts, you hate to sya that two players make a difference but I saw it and they did. If they were not there they would have lost.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |