Round 23 - Central Dist v Glenelg @ Eliz 2:10pm Sat 4th Sept

[sjt]

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/tigers-appeal-sellar-lose-button/story-e6freckc-1225912497834

How many games has Nash played this year?

[bulldogproud2]

Enough to qualify comfortably.
Cheers

[sjt]

Enough to qualify comfortably.
Cheers

Sorry, I meant as many as Sellar? Not that, that's the rule i.e 9 games.

[bulldogproud2]

Not sure of his exact number but it would be somewhere around the 9 mark, I would think.

[HeartBeatsTrue]

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/tigers-appeal-sellar-lose-button/story-e6freckc-1225912497834

PO rules are rules.

[sjt]

It will be interesting to see what "case" they have put forward. Seems pretty clean-cut rule.

[whufc]

must be getting close to the finals the bays are starting to get desperate.

the rule is very and black and white and consistent through 9 SANFL clubs but im sure if sellar is made available then so will )ay Nash who would probably be more valuable on the big beff oval in the predicted weather conditions.

is the bay belly starting to kick in.

[Royal City]

must be getting close to the finals the bays are starting to get desperate.

the rule is very and black and white and consistent through 9 SANFL clubs but im sure if sellar is made available then so will )ay Nash who would probably be more valuable on the big beff oval in the predicted weather conditions.

is the bay belly starting to kick in.

hahahahaha!!!! seems to be common this time of year.

Maybe if the bays kept PUMPA they wouldnt have to resort to such tactics.

[FOURTH ESTATE]

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/tigers-appeal-sellar-lose-button/story-e6freckc-1225912497834

The SAAFL did a way with this stupid rule this year.
Are we not supposed to be promoting the game???????????????
If they qualify let them play. That's what we did in the SAAFL. We gained a player for the finals and was high in our best for the match.

[whufc]

i have no problem with the sanfl doing away with this rule completely but thats not the issue here. we are talking about one club who want one player excused from the rule because they got an injury to a similar player.

the rule is either enforced and is very black or white or they do away with the rule completely at the beginning of next season.

funny part is i think if the rule is bended for glenelg this acutally suits central who could do with a replacement for ohara being nash who would be much better suited to the predicted weather conditions. there would be no possible way the sanfl could deny nash playing if they allow sellar to play

[bulldogproud2]

Unfortunately if Sellar is allowed to play, Nash will still not be. Appeals had to be lodged on Monday. However, I can't see how the league can allow the rule to be changed for just one player. The rule has been in place for a while and all clubs were aware of it.
Cheers

[Dirko]

Unfortunately if Sellar is allowed to play, Nash will still not be. Appeals had to be lodged on Monday. However, I can't see how the league can allow the rule to be changed for just one player. The rule has been in place for a while and all clubs were aware of it.
Cheers

You can all relax. It has been denied.

[blackcat]

As far as I'm concerned the finals start this week. the dogs have been insipid the last month or so, I know they've had a "HEAVY TRAINING REGIME" but now is the time to stand up and start playing "finals" footy. If it dosent happen this week I think we will be in for a short finals campaign. The side has been too unsettled for far too long now with 3,4 or more changes every week and I think this is having a negative effect on the team. God I hope I'm proven wrong and look like a dickhead which i will gratefully accept if the Dogs that we know produce the goods

[CENTURION]

Insipid? We smashed an improving Port, beat Norwood & smashed West, plus gave South a 5 goal head start on their oval. We lost to Sturt at Unley by only 2 goals & to the Eagles on their oval, where We hardly win, by about 4 goals. Going on this form, We have been insipid all season!!

[Big Phil]

BROADCAST ALLOCATION:

1197am 5RPH from 1.30pm Saturday

or - http://www.rphadelaide.org.au/sanflcoverage.htm

[LBT]

must be getting close to the finals the bays are starting to get desperate.

the rule is very and black and white and consistent through 9 SANFL clubs but im sure if sellar is made available then so will )ay Nash who would probably be more valuable on the big beff oval in the predicted weather conditions.

is the bay belly starting to kick in.

hahahahaha!!!! seems to be common this time of year.

Maybe if the bays kept PUMPA they wouldnt have to resort to such tactics.

Actually Sutherland walked out on Glenelg to chase coin in Canberra and then the riverland but whatever you reckon.

[bulldogproud2]

Unfortunately if Sellar is allowed to play, Nash will still not be. Appeals had to be lodged on Monday. However, I can't see how the league can allow the rule to be changed for just one player. The rule has been in place for a while and all clubs were aware of it.
Cheers

You can all relax. It has been denied.

Probably not a bad result for Glenelg in the end. With the conditions that are forecast, it will not be a big man's game on Saturday.
Cheers

[Booney]

Unfortunately if Sellar is allowed to play, Nash will still not be. Appeals had to be lodged on Monday. However, I can't see how the league can allow the rule to be changed for just one player. The rule has been in place for a while and all clubs were aware of it.
Cheers

You can all relax. It has been denied.

And so it should have been.

[beef]

one BIG dogs suPporter Has been very quIet on this topic. I belive he was heard on monday night jumping off the bandwagon and basically giving glenelg the premireship already. Has been known to get very nervous this time of year but its a different feeling this year

[whufc]

forget the dogs last two performances saturday will be the best guide of where centrals are at

people were sayung central were gone and its a different feel in 2006 and we only just scraped into the three that year.