
by overloaded » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:27 am
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by Justquietly » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:55 am
tiger08 wrote:Ken Whelan Fan wrote:Were there two reports?
Lets face it we are all P!$$ weak what we continue to tolerate
wont result in change ! These guys continually bend/break the rules
they threaten and intimidate players from 10 years old upward,
They keep fronting the tribunal and get off with a kiss and a cuddle.
what the hell are we doing
KWF....were doing nothing wrong, unfortunately in the bigger picyture society and politics have allowed reverse racism to spawn which at this stage is out of control. You just have to look at The Gang of 49 and how powerless the Police are in being able to bring the situation under control with their hands tied behind their back under current Policing regulations. What is needed is some old school justice and get back the respect everyday people deserve.
When you have any town divided in to two with white against black at anything this scenario will always be the outcome, the only way to resolve this is by abolishing Mallee Park full stop. Who gives a **** if we have a bye, it will be better for football and our town.
by tiger08 » Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:31 pm
Justquietly wrote:tiger08 wrote:Ken Whelan Fan wrote:Were there two reports?
Lets face it we are all P!$$ weak what we continue to tolerate
wont result in change ! These guys continually bend/break the rules
they threaten and intimidate players from 10 years old upward,
They keep fronting the tribunal and get off with a kiss and a cuddle.
what the hell are we doing
KWF....were doing nothing wrong, unfortunately in the bigger picyture society and politics have allowed reverse racism to spawn which at this stage is out of control. You just have to look at The Gang of 49 and how powerless the Police are in being able to bring the situation under control with their hands tied behind their back under current Policing regulations. What is needed is some old school justice and get back the respect everyday people deserve.
When you have any town divided in to two with white against black at anything this scenario will always be the outcome, the only way to resolve this is by abolishing Mallee Park full stop. Who gives a **** if we have a bye, it will be better for football and our town.
If it's a spineless panel that are scared to hand out penalties due to (this is speculative) fear of retribution, is a tele/videoconference tribunal possible? The league could use a panel from another league that would not at all be influenced by societal issues or fears of retribution. This is just an idea that would have each case heard on its merits and the tribunal would be dealing with what's in front of them ie rap sheets and what the umpire saw.
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
by Justquietly » Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:35 pm
by One Eyed » Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:37 pm
by tiger08 » Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:52 pm
One Eyed wrote:Point of order here. What is reverse racism ?
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
by One Eyed » Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:54 pm
by bluestheboy » Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:59 pm
by tiger08 » Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:01 pm
One Eyed wrote:Thats just called racism. Period.
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
by Media Park » Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:20 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by overloaded » Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:26 pm
Media Park wrote:Orion would have been rough conduct or something similar, since he allegedly slammed someone's head into the ground.
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by bluestheboy » Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:42 pm
by Media Park » Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:51 pm
bluestheboy wrote:Is my mail right that it was a young boundary umpire?
Not that it should make any difference, but the intimidation factor can be an issue.
Who was on the tribunal?
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by westcoastpanther » Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:56 pm
bluestheboy wrote:Is my mail right that it was a young boundary umpire?
Not that it should make any difference, but the intimidation factor can be an issue.
Who was on the tribunal?
by bluestheboy » Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:05 pm
westcoastpanther wrote:bluestheboy wrote:Is my mail right that it was a young boundary umpire?
Not that it should make any difference, but the intimidation factor can be an issue.
Who was on the tribunal?
J O'B was reported by a young boundary umpire on the vaguest of evidence a few years ago (probably the only time he actually was not guilty) but the tribunal gave him two weeks.
Mal's was thrown out because the report stated striking an 'unknown player', again vague evidence.
What is the difference here, well we all know that answer......and don't say prior records because they are both poor for these two players.
by Media Park » Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:15 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by westcoastpanther » Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:46 pm
bluestheboy wrote:I hear that dees had 3 big names missing from saturday. Don't reckon they would be too upset about the result...
Sounds like the match of the finals will be in the first week
by sherrin22 » Tue Aug 10, 2010 3:05 pm
westcoastpanther wrote:bluestheboy wrote:Is my mail right that it was a young boundary umpire?
Not that it should make any difference, but the intimidation factor can be an issue.
Who was on the tribunal?
J O'B was reported by a young boundary umpire on the vaguest of evidence a few years ago (probably the only time he actually was not guilty) but the tribunal gave him two weeks.
Mal's was thrown out because the report stated striking an 'unknown player', again vague evidence.
What is the difference here, well we all know that answer......and don't say prior records because they are both poor for these two players.
by sherrin22 » Tue Aug 10, 2010 3:07 pm
overloaded wrote:Media Park wrote:Orion would have been rough conduct or something similar, since he allegedly slammed someone's head into the ground.
Good to see this 16yo lad following the example set by the senior players
by tiger08 » Tue Aug 10, 2010 3:40 pm
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |