by SATCHEL » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:40 am
by piccachu » Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:16 am
by turbo182 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 12:00 pm
was surprised to see the portland boys heavily out weighed smosh players back in the club rooms, after the round 3 encounter the smosh boys hung around for a couple of beers but wernt there at there own oval, may have had a show on elsewere just was a touch surprised.
by piccachu » Mon Jul 05, 2010 12:12 pm
Not too sure mate, as had something on myself and had to bail straight after the game. Good to hear the Portland lads hung round for a beer though, good form I say.
Good game in front of a big crowd I thought. Moody was a clear BOG. Heard a rumour he may have broken ribs - any truth to it? I got roped into time-keeping and was interesting to note Portland made only 4 interchanges in the first half - 3 of them being for the ruckman - no. 16. with the long hair. When he came off for a rest each time, SMOSH clearly got on top. The umprie blew time off for the first time (excluding the obvious Goals/behinds/out of bounds) at about twenty five minutes into the last quarter. Do they deliberately not do it, or is this just not attention to detail? Some questionable umpiring decisions, but not really favouring either side. Portland just finished the game better in the end, but a good desperate game, which is nothing less then you'd expect in a local derby.
Different aspect of the game, but I'd rather be bloody playing then time-keeping thats for sure!
by bubba love » Mon Jul 05, 2010 2:30 pm
by piccachu » Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:53 pm
portland playing some really good footy at the moment with an even spread of the work load across the ground, thornton back this week, coppins back in a couple and a few more the week after that, everything looking really positive at thunder land
by scrappy1 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:05 pm
sheeds wrote:I went to Para Hills yesterday on my way back from Wallaroo hoping to see Roo play but in the end wasn't disappointed he didn't play because I saw a pretty good game of footy. IMO however, having multiple goalkickers is a far better option than relying on a few and PAC just had too many blokes who could lead up or take pack marks. The ruckman that went forward looked like he was playing on the wing at the time because they had another big left footer playing ruck so I'm not sure he "slutted" (whatever that means!) forward - more like he got away from his opponent to me. The #8, for whatever you think of him would be a nightmare to stand - and would require the best backman from the opposition (and he would still take marks) so that leaves all the other options to worry about. Para Hills ff & chf were good especially 1 on 1 and I was suprised to see their position on the ladder this morning - they looked better than that. I have no idea who is the best team in the div because I don't follow it closely but those 2 teams played a good style of footy yesterday. Just my opinion!
by lutz » Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:08 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:11 pm
by bubba love » Mon Jul 05, 2010 7:22 pm
by teaoby » Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:50 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Our ruckman sluts everywhere 24/7 trying to pick up anything easy
by Sturtman » Tue Jul 06, 2010 12:53 pm
by piccachu » Tue Jul 06, 2010 12:57 pm
Did anyone at the Smosh V Portland game see that idiot wearing a Tee-ball uniform in the crowd??
by Sturtman » Tue Jul 06, 2010 12:58 pm
piccachu wrote:Did anyone at the Smosh V Portland game see that idiot wearing a Tee-ball uniform in the crowd??
is that the same bloke that was attempting to drink heavies and kept spilling them all over the place?
by FOURTH ESTATE » Tue Jul 06, 2010 1:21 pm
by Iron Fist » Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:33 pm
FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Question needs to be asked. The focus has been on Kilburn for the last couple of years with their slide down the grades but the blow torch has never be applied to Scotch. Only a couple of years ago they were knocking on the door of D1 but now are close to sliding to D4. With all their connections and cashed VP's surely they would be able to get a decent side together to challange for a higher grade. PAOC & SPOC are on the right track. Can anyone answer what is the problem down there.
They have flown under the Radar for the last few years with all the heat on other clubs maybe questions should be asked about them especially after last weekend losing on their own dunghill!!!!
Wonder if the Kilburn boys knew the song!!!!!
by zedman » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:15 pm
FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Question needs to be asked. The focus has been on Kilburn for the last couple of years with their slide down the grades but the blow torch has never be applied to Scotch. Only a couple of years ago they were knocking on the door of D1 but now are close to sliding to D4. With all their connections and cashed VP's surely they would be able to get a decent side together to challange for a higher grade. PAOC & SPOC are on the right track. Can anyone answer what is the problem down there.
They have flown under the Radar for the last few years with all the heat on other clubs maybe questions should be asked about them especially after last weekend losing on their own dunghill!!!!
Wonder if the Kilburn boys knew the song!!!!!
by One Eyed » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:19 pm
by Top End » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:52 pm
One Eyed wrote:They were handy in 06&07. Who are the new faces zed.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |