$3.6M Prospect Oval Development

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby Booney » Tue May 25, 2010 5:22 pm

Wedgie wrote:The improvements continued, a new wind sock has just been announced by the club. North are certainly going places! :lol:


I trust it is being supplied by the official SANFL wind sock provider? :lol:
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61802
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8229 times
Been liked: 11959 times

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby Wedgie » Tue May 25, 2010 5:56 pm

tipper wrote:
Wedgie wrote:The improvements continued, a new wind sock has just been announced by the club. North are certainly going places! :lol:


Thats a terrible idea. they should stick to the heritage of the old windsock, its only been there since our last flag......

It looked like it had been there since our first flag! :lol:
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby topsywaldron » Tue May 25, 2010 7:16 pm

Booney wrote:I trust it is being supplied by the official SANFL wind sock provider? :lol:


The windsock actually comes from an interstate supplier and costs $140,000 but North have got it for $10,000 as the windsock just loves the club and James Moore wouldn't stop hassling its family.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby on the rails » Thu May 27, 2010 8:07 am

topsywaldron wrote: I'll be curious to see how they spin nearly a gift of $2M of taxpayer funds into yet more moaning about the injustice of it all. Maybe another march because the project didn't get entirely funded by the Federal Government? :D


As per page 26 of today's 'Tiser, the overall project cost is $3.63 million and will be funded as follows:
$1.75 million from Federal Grant
$1.63 million from the NAFC
$250,000 from the Prospect Council.
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
on the rails
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby Booney » Thu May 27, 2010 8:50 am

topsywaldron wrote:
Booney wrote:I trust it is being supplied by the official SANFL wind sock provider? :lol:


The windsock actually comes from an interstate supplier and costs $140,000 but North have got it for $10,000 as the windsock just loves the club and James Moore wouldn't stop hassling its family.


A portion of the wind socks total cost will not be considered under the total capital expenditure as the wind sock is under going training which will enable it to train and upskill younger wind socks. :lol:
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61802
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8229 times
Been liked: 11959 times

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby on the rails » Thu May 27, 2010 8:59 am

Booney wrote:
topsywaldron wrote:
Booney wrote:I trust it is being supplied by the official SANFL wind sock provider? :lol:


The windsock actually comes from an interstate supplier and costs $140,000 but North have got it for $10,000 as the windsock just loves the club and James Moore wouldn't stop hassling its family.


A portion of the wind socks total cost will not be considered under the total capital expenditure as the wind sock is under going training which will enable it to train and upskill younger wind socks. :lol:


LOL - will it fit under our Salary Cap though?
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
on the rails
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby Booney » Thu May 27, 2010 9:06 am

You North blokes are weird, who wears a sock under a cap? ;)
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61802
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8229 times
Been liked: 11959 times

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby Wedgie » Thu May 27, 2010 9:22 am

Booney wrote:You North blokes are weird, who wears a sock under a cap? ;)

Unless you walk on your head your feet are under your head!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby doggies4eva » Thu May 27, 2010 1:18 pm

I hope that the bar is big enough to cater for the "free beer for Centrals supporters" functions.
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby mikeyb » Thu May 27, 2010 2:22 pm

Good place to start is somewhere decent and close to park, poor form especially if you are trying entice people to come to the footy
mikeyb
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 5:53 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby HeartBeatsTrue » Thu May 27, 2010 2:33 pm

mikeyb wrote:Good place to start is somewhere decent and close to park, poor form especially if you are trying entice people to come to the footy
Dont think they'll build a car park for 3000 patrons but you raise a good point.
Norwood needed more off street parking and had to use the area where the RSL hall is for a carpark otherwise the facility planned for Coopers stadium would not be approved. Car park between Southern Stand and Parade not big enough.
HeartBeatsTrue
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1194
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:24 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 5 times
Grassroots Team: Pooraka

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby Wedgie » Thu May 27, 2010 3:06 pm

Must admit Ive never had a problem at either Prospect or Norwood even when rocking up late.
I usually have to walk further at Unley, Woodville and Richmond now.
Probably a local knowledge issue and years of trying to find parks at suburban grounds when 5000 more people attended though.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby robranisgod » Thu May 27, 2010 3:17 pm

Wedgie wrote:Must admit Ive never had a problem at either Prospect or Norwood even when rocking up late.
I usually have to walk further at Unley, Woodville and Richmond now.
Probably a local knowledge issue and years of trying to find parks at suburban grounds when 5000 more people attended though.

I have to agree with Wedgie, Prospect is easy to find a close park, even when there is a fair size crowd, to me Unley is the worst.
robranisgod
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2065
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:36 pm
Has liked: 94 times
Been liked: 275 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders University

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby JK » Thu May 27, 2010 3:24 pm

robranisgod wrote:
Wedgie wrote:Must admit Ive never had a problem at either Prospect or Norwood even when rocking up late.
I usually have to walk further at Unley, Woodville and Richmond now.
Probably a local knowledge issue and years of trying to find parks at suburban grounds when 5000 more people attended though.

I have to agree with Wedgie, Prospect is easy to find a close park, even when there is a fair size crowd, to me Unley is the worst.


Surprisingly I rocked up just before the start this year, took a different street to normal, and got a pretty decent park for Prospect which usually provides my longest walk.

However I kind of consider the walk to the footy as part of the whole days "package" ... They certainly don't take as long at anywhere as they did back in the early 80's when there was around triple the crowd attending at suburban grounds.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby on the rails » Thu May 27, 2010 3:25 pm

mikeyb wrote:Good place to start is somewhere decent and close to park, poor form especially if you are trying entice people to come to the footy


Well the only reason you can get a decent park on most occasions at Glenelg is because the School is next to it! Try not having that to park in then Glenelg would have exactly the same issues!
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
on the rails
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 83 times

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby spell_check » Sat May 29, 2010 8:52 pm

The SAAFL should have applied for the same type of grant that North did and it might have got Thebarton decent lights.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby FOURTH ESTATE » Sun May 30, 2010 1:19 am

What Colonel Klink and the rest of Goons at Stalag Thebarton including the Coffee Makers getting it right? Me thinks not
2017, 2019 & 2020 PREMIERS
RICHMOND, RICHMOND, RICHMOND.


Let that be a lesson to you Sturt. You don't beat Glenelg 3 times in a row in Grand Finals and get away with it.
User avatar
FOURTH ESTATE
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3677
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:08 pm
Location: Front Row in the "Black Hole" of Allegiant Stadium
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 133 times
Grassroots Team: Broadview

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby CENTURION » Sun May 30, 2010 10:42 am

prospect is easy to get to, there's a bus stop right out the front on main north road!
Member No. 988 & PROUD to sponsor The CDFC!!
User avatar
CENTURION
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11101
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:11 am
Location: Campbelltown, 5074
Has liked: 204 times
Been liked: 112 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby Trent Plucktrum » Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:52 pm

CENTURION wrote:prospect is easy to get to, there's a bus stop right out the front on main north road!

Don't you normally roll up in a limo you upmarket Twat !! ;)
My Team


The Cocks
User avatar
Trent Plucktrum
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:05 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: $3.6M Prospect Oval Development

Postby prowling panther » Sun Jun 06, 2010 12:57 am

there were plenty of parking close by today......
I wish my remembering was as good as my forgetting
User avatar
prowling panther
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1353
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:04 am
Has liked: 90 times
Been liked: 28 times
Grassroots Team: Hectorville

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |