2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Adelaide Footy League Talk
Post Reply
User avatar
Footy Chick
Moderator
Posts: 27021
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:14 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: anywhere I want to be...
Has thanked: 1794 times
Been thanked: 2249 times
Contact:

2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by Footy Chick »

So you stop clogging the new D7 thread with C grade crap!
My new Mantra - I am no longer available to things and people that make me feel like shit
Bombers4EVA
League - Best 21
Posts: 1769
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:35 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Has thanked: 326 times
Been thanked: 89 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by Bombers4EVA »

When will C1,C2,C3,etc... draw be finalised?
jo172
Veteran
Posts: 3602
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:30 pm
Has thanked: 1248 times
Been thanked: 750 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by jo172 »

Footy Chick wrote:So you stop clogging the new D7 thread with C grade crap!


D7 is essentially a C Grade Comp now!
Executive Member
Veteran
Posts: 3516
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:13 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 140 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by Executive Member »

Bombers4EVA wrote:When will C1,C2,C3,etc... draw be finalised?


its up and available
User avatar
old farmer
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1247
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:47 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Hawthorn
Team: Ingle Farm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 112 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by old farmer »

good job considering the end of div 8 and juggling those teams into the 6 C Grade comps.
I would have thought Pultney would be higher than 6, Smashed everyone bar Modbury last year and Smithfield (C4) would be the obvious swap with them as there is no way they are gunna have a team of sandbaggers like Pultney. And the D Grade comp gets called C5 whilst a C Grade comp gets C6, minor I know but makes sense.
But well done and happy with our draw and plenty of triple headers..... =D>
Success is not final; failure is not fatal: It is the courage to continue that counts....
Executive Member
Veteran
Posts: 3516
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:13 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 140 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by Executive Member »

old farmer wrote:good job considering the end of div 8 and juggling those teams into the 6 C Grade comps.
I would have thought Pultney would be higher than 6, Smashed everyone bar Modbury last year and Smithfield (C4) would be the obvious swap with them as there is no way they are gunna have a team of sandbaggers like Pultney. And the D Grade comp gets called C5 whilst a C Grade comp gets C6, minor I know but makes sense.
But well done and happy with our draw and plenty of triple headers..... =D>


Looks like you got half your suggestion up, Pulteney and Seaton have swapped in C6/C4
User avatar
old farmer
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1247
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:47 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Hawthorn
Team: Ingle Farm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 112 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by old farmer »

Executive Member wrote:
old farmer wrote:good job considering the end of div 8 and juggling those teams into the 6 C Grade comps.
I would have thought Pultney would be higher than 6, Smashed everyone bar Modbury last year and Smithfield (C4) would be the obvious swap with them as there is no way they are gunna have a team of sandbaggers like Pultney. And the D Grade comp gets called C5 whilst a C Grade comp gets C6, minor I know but makes sense.
But well done and happy with our draw and plenty of triple headers..... =D>


Looks like you got half your suggestion up, Pulteney and Seaton have swapped in C6/C4


Happy about that, as would your boys be EM. :supz:
Last edited by old farmer on Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Success is not final; failure is not fatal: It is the courage to continue that counts....
Executive Member
Veteran
Posts: 3516
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:13 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 140 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by Executive Member »

old farmer wrote:
Executive Member wrote:
old farmer wrote:good job considering the end of div 8 and juggling those teams into the 6 C Grade comps.
I would have thought Pultney would be higher than 6, Smashed everyone bar Modbury last year and Smithfield (C4) would be the obvious swap with them as there is no way they are gunna have a team of sandbaggers like Pultney. And the D Grade comp gets called C5 whilst a C Grade comp gets C6, minor I know but makes sense.
But well done and happy with our draw and plenty of triple headers..... =D>


Looks like you got half your suggestion up, Pulteney and Seaton have swapped in C6/C4


Happy about that, as would your boys EM. :supz:


not sure it will make any difference :lol:
Sass!
Under 16s
Posts: 345
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:06 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Modbury
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 47 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by Sass! »

Once I finally got my head around the fact our D Grade will start a week earlier than our C grade and a vast majority of our games will be played together I was pretty impressed by the comps. As mentioned it would of been a nightmare to sort these competitions out but they seem to have done pretty well. . Being in a comp with local rivals such as TTG, Hope Valley and Golden Grove is always a benefit and can also be an incentive to entice some older players out.
zedman
Coach
Posts: 6466
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:18 pm
Has thanked: 1091 times
Been thanked: 387 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by zedman »

looks like lockleys and smithies got the short straw..pulteney killed us last year and every other club has an A grade in div 4 or higher..quite a challenge for our lads..
Last edited by zedman on Tue Mar 01, 2016 2:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TEX07
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:10 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Golden Grove
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 49 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by TEX07 »

That first week had me for a second there I thought that we were playing same time as the C grade. Its not too bad but i think we would have prefered to be in Div 7 - pretty big drop off now from D3R to C3 as opposed to D7. but it is what it is - we probably need to play in the 25 player a side comps based on good numbers anyway.
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español
Inallseriousness
Under 16s
Posts: 356
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 6:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Hawthorn
Team: Ingle Farm
Has thanked: 119 times
Been thanked: 106 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by Inallseriousness »

According to Headquarters over the last 3 years there have been more reports in U18's and C grade comp combined versus Div 1 - 7 combined....look out for a massive crackdown in this area
User avatar
Pag
Coach
Posts: 5465
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 5:27 pm
Team: Richmond
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 534 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by Pag »

Inallseriousness wrote:According to Headquarters over the last 3 years there have been more reports in U18's and C grade comp combined versus Div 1 - 7 combined....look out for a massive crackdown in this area

This doesn't surprise me one bit.
jo172
Veteran
Posts: 3602
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 5:30 pm
Has thanked: 1248 times
Been thanked: 750 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by jo172 »

Pag wrote:
Inallseriousness wrote:According to Headquarters over the last 3 years there have been more reports in U18's and C grade comp combined versus Div 1 - 7 combined....look out for a massive crackdown in this area

This doesn't surprise me one bit.


Putting to one side the Under 18s (largely fuelled by testosterone and coaches who can't see the wood from the trees) I'd be a bit surprised if there were more reports in C Grades than in A/B Grades purely because of a reluctance for club umpires to go through the process. What I would expect is due to the relative wild west of C Grades that when these reports lead to findings of guilt there are more extreme penalties.

I suspect the accurate statement is that there are far more weeks of suspension in the C Grade comps relative to the A/B Grade comps
Inallseriousness
Under 16s
Posts: 356
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 6:47 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Hawthorn
Team: Ingle Farm
Has thanked: 119 times
Been thanked: 106 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by Inallseriousness »

jo172 wrote:
Pag wrote:
Inallseriousness wrote:According to Headquarters over the last 3 years there have been more reports in U18's and C grade comp combined versus Div 1 - 7 combined....look out for a massive crackdown in this area

This doesn't surprise me one bit.


Putting to one side the Under 18s (largely fuelled by testosterone and coaches who can't see the wood from the trees) I'd be a bit surprised if there were more reports in C Grades than in A/B Grades purely because of a reluctance for club umpires to go through the process. What I would expect is due to the relative wild west of C Grades that when these reports lead to findings of guilt there are more extreme penalties.

I suspect the accurate statement is that there are far more weeks of suspension in the C Grade comps relative to the A/B Grade comps


Definitely more games, I thought the stat put up at the coaches forum last night said both but I may be wrong...it was a long night :D
zedman
Coach
Posts: 6466
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:18 pm
Has thanked: 1091 times
Been thanked: 387 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by zedman »

Inallseriousness wrote:
jo172 wrote:
Pag wrote:
Inallseriousness wrote:According to Headquarters over the last 3 years there have been more reports in U18's and C grade comp combined versus Div 1 - 7 combined....look out for a massive crackdown in this area

This doesn't surprise me one bit.


Putting to one side the Under 18s (largely fuelled by testosterone and coaches who can't see the wood from the trees) I'd be a bit surprised if there were more reports in C Grades than in A/B Grades purely because of a reluctance for club umpires to go through the process. What I would expect is due to the relative wild west of C Grades that when these reports lead to findings of guilt there are more extreme penalties.

I suspect the accurate statement is that there are far more weeks of suspension in the C Grade comps relative to the A/B Grade comps


Definitely more games, I thought the stat put up at the coaches forum last night said both but I may be wrong...it was a long night :D


i think what they are saying is that clubs doing triple headers are having a much better record at the tribunal because club officials are more prevalent at the games and can hose down spot fires quickly and more successfully than a c grade playing away solo with hardly any volunteers off the ground..hence the lowering of tribunal cases for clubs doing the triples..
User avatar
Trader
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4666
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 12:49 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 981 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by Trader »

Inallseriousness wrote:According to Headquarters over the last 3 years there have been more reports in U18's and C grade comp combined versus Div 1 - 7 combined....look out for a massive crackdown in this area


Well 2015 certainly went against that trend...

D1 -D7 - 35 Reports, 31 Guilty, 114 Weeks suspended, average of 3.68 games per guilty.
D1R - D7R - 18 Reports, 15 Guilty, 40 Weeks suspended, average of 2.67
D8, 8R, C1-C4 - 8 Reports, 8 Guilty, 30 Weeks, ave 3.75
U18 - 14 Reports, 14 Guilty, 39 Weeks, ave 2.79 (excludes the 3 years given to the coach).
Danny Southern telling Plugga he's fat, I'd like to see that!
The Bedge
Coach
Posts: 17877
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 11:58 am
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Location: BarbeeCueAria
Has thanked: 3336 times
Been thanked: 4469 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by The Bedge »

Trader wrote:Well 2015 certainly went against that trend...
D8, 8R, C1-C4 - 8 Reports, 8 Guilty, 30 Weeks, ave 3.75.

and 12 of those weeks were one player..
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
User avatar
Trader
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4666
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 12:49 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 981 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by Trader »

Seems my post may have upset the establishment!

What they meant was D1-D7, 35 reports from 65 teams = 0.54 reports per team.
U18, 14 reports from 18 teams = 0.78 reports per team.

I agree with them that that is a concerning number in the U18s, and the more the league pushes harder penalties for both players and clubs who pick these players, the better the league as a whole will be.
Danny Southern telling Plugga he's fat, I'd like to see that!
User avatar
Fricky
League - Best 21
Posts: 1557
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:46 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Walkerville
Location: The Cattery
Has thanked: 106 times
Been thanked: 127 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 C Grades thread - general discussion

Post by Fricky »

Cheers to the Portland C grade lads who had a beer in the club after the game yesterday. Tough season for Portland but they had enough for a side and put a few bucks over our bar which is very much appreciated.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 76 guests