SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Adelaide Footy League Talk
Locked

Who will win the 2010 Flag

Adelaide Lutheran
16
7%
Blackfriars OS
10
4%
Brahma Lodge
46
20%
Elizabeth
30
13%
Hectorville
18
8%
Hope Valley
16
7%
North Haven
10
4%
Plympton
48
21%
Rosewater
18
8%
Smithfield
13
6%
 
Total votes: 225

User avatar
The Dark Knight
Coach
Posts: 36133
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:02 pm
Team: North Haven
Location: Gotham City
Has thanked: 12447 times
Been thanked: 1744 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by The Dark Knight »

Plympton vs Blackfriars (Plympton)
Hectorville vs Smithfield (Daly Oval)
Elizabeth vs Rosewater (Argana Park)
Hope Valley vs Adelaide Lutheran (Hope Valley)
Brahma Lodge vs North Haven (Brahma Lodge)
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17951
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:18 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3235 times
Been thanked: 2576 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by woodublieve12 »

Jabber wrote:
zedman wrote:
number2 wrote:Who cares if you guys out at elizabeth are so good then don't worry about it and get on with playing footy.

I believe Plympton have a lot of improvment in them with some very good players to come back in over the next 2 weeks and they will knock elizabeth off next time fair and square!


fido bedow's brother?



Sssssomeones gone mmmmmmental!


gone berresk!!!
"Be curious, not judgmental""
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17951
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:18 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3235 times
Been thanked: 2576 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by woodublieve12 »

Your a tool mate. Typical Plympton attitude :?

And as far as makin errors. Who was the person at SAAFL HQ that entered a newborn as a senior player? Maybe a bit of brainpower combined with commonsense, he/she may have picked up the phone to us and asked the question why? Problem sorted!

Plympton dont deserve the points from that day, we were far too good and should get our points back. End of Story![/quote]

firstly we all know how tough the league are on getting things rite, especially paper work, as said in a earlier post you guys made the mistake!!!! Not us, not the league! Elizabeth did!!!!! This all couldv'e been avoided if you guys did you job properly!!!. maybe some one should be held accountable and stop blaiming everyone else....we did not deserve the points, we didnt earn them, but we'll take them (as would every other club would).... Now its end of story!!!
"Be curious, not judgmental""
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17951
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:18 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3235 times
Been thanked: 2576 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by woodublieve12 »

Jabber wrote:
barbs wrote:
boozehound wrote:We would have absolutely no reason to do this....Everyone knew Ben Halliday was playing at Elizabeth after having a year off. There was never a danger of Salisbury North not clearing him....

In all honesty it would be a joke if the decision stands but hopefully if it does (which will not surprise me with the morons running the league) it will not effect our position on the ladder come round 18.


By the same token wouldn't everyone have known he was a registered Salisbury North player? Also whoever does the clearances would know it's a straight registration after 2 years off not just 1. Surely it would raise alarm bells?


I cant believe the SAAFL's "incompetence" is under scrutiny when clearly there was only one party out of Plympton, Elizabeth, and SAAFL, that made an error.

We're talking about the same club that wasnt aware how many were allowed on the bench of a C5 game in round 1, and the team manager came into the centre to speak with the umps to ask why plympton had so many on the bench.

It seems as if admin is afterthough for the eags.


that was funny....
"Be curious, not judgmental""
User avatar
BenchedEagle
League - Top 5
Posts: 2818
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:35 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 51 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by BenchedEagle »

woodublieve12 wrote:
Jabber wrote:
barbs wrote:
boozehound wrote:We would have absolutely no reason to do this....Everyone knew Ben Halliday was playing at Elizabeth after having a year off. There was never a danger of Salisbury North not clearing him....

In all honesty it would be a joke if the decision stands but hopefully if it does (which will not surprise me with the morons running the league) it will not effect our position on the ladder come round 18.


By the same token wouldn't everyone have known he was a registered Salisbury North player? Also whoever does the clearances would know it's a straight registration after 2 years off not just 1. Surely it would raise alarm bells?


I cant believe the SAAFL's "incompetence" is under scrutiny when clearly there was only one party out of Plympton, Elizabeth, and SAAFL, that made an error.

We're talking about the same club that wasnt aware how many were allowed on the bench of a C5 game in round 1, and the team manager came into the centre to speak with the umps to ask why plympton had so many on the bench.

It seems as if admin is afterthough for the eags.


that was funny....

So was the story of Plymptons coach having a hissy fit and taking his bat and ball and walkin out! :lol:
NO-MERCY
Coach
Posts: 5336
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:51 pm
Team: Collingwood
Been thanked: 15 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by NO-MERCY »

(S)aintbackline wrote:I know for a fact that these players approached Rosewater (Very Reliable Source as well!), not Rosewater approaching them, so going by that maybe there is trouble at Seaton if players are looking to jump ship this early in the year........................



You know jack sh!t pal, we are talking about 1 player here no more, their is no trouble ( as much as you would love their to be ) at Seaton whatsoever, no-one's looking to jump.
One lad i know was approached by Rosewater & was offered $$ which he declined after a meeting with them last Tuesday.
He's obviously changed his mind since, probably after a bigger offer.
The club won't stand is his way providing his subs are payed, he's a player that doesn't like paying subs obviously.
The club has stated if theirs no sign of subs being payed you will not be playing until sign's are shown of payment, its simple pay the required $$ & you have the clearance signed, the lads attitude stinks anyway & i'd be more than happy to see the back of him & his dad.
User avatar
The Dark Knight
Coach
Posts: 36133
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:02 pm
Team: North Haven
Location: Gotham City
Has thanked: 12447 times
Been thanked: 1744 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by The Dark Knight »

NO-MERCY wrote:
(S)aintbackline wrote:I know for a fact that these players approached Rosewater (Very Reliable Source as well!), not Rosewater approaching them, so going by that maybe there is trouble at Seaton if players are looking to jump ship this early in the year........................



You know jack sh!t pal, we are talking about 1 player here no more, their is no trouble ( as much as you would love their to be ) at Seaton whatsoever, no-one's looking to jump.
One lad i know was approached by Rosewater & was offered $$ which he declined after a meeting with them last Tuesday.
He's obviously changed his mind since, probably after a bigger offer.
The club won't stand is his way providing his subs are payed, he's a player that doesn't like paying subs obviously.
The club has stated if theirs no sign of subs being payed you will not be playing until sign's are shown of payment, its simple pay the required $$ & you have the clearance signed, the lads attitude stinks anyway & i'd be more than happy to see the back of him & his dad.


I reckon you should make the trip down to Rosewater NM and give them a piece of your mind!! That will sort things out
User avatar
The BulldogLover
Rookie
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 10:18 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Rosewater
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by The BulldogLover »

NO-MERCY wrote:
(S)aintbackline wrote:I know for a fact that these players approached Rosewater (Very Reliable Source as well!), not Rosewater approaching them, so going by that maybe there is trouble at Seaton if players are looking to jump ship this early in the year........................



You know jack sh!t pal, we are talking about 1 player here no more, their is no trouble ( as much as you would love their to be ) at Seaton whatsoever, no-one's looking to jump.
One lad i know was approached by Rosewater & was offered $$ which he declined after a meeting with them last Tuesday.
He's obviously changed his mind since, probably after a bigger offer.
The club won't stand is his way providing his subs are payed, he's a player that doesn't like paying subs obviously.
The club has stated if theirs no sign of subs being payed you will not be playing until sign's are shown of payment, its simple pay the required $$ & you have the clearance signed, the lads attitude stinks anyway & i'd be more than happy to see the back of him & his dad.


Who would this player be NO-Mercy?? can i ask?? MATE...
User avatar
The BulldogLover
Rookie
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 10:18 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Rosewater
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by The BulldogLover »

The Dark Knight wrote:
NO-MERCY wrote:
(S)aintbackline wrote:I know for a fact that these players approached Rosewater (Very Reliable Source as well!), not Rosewater approaching them, so going by that maybe there is trouble at Seaton if players are looking to jump ship this early in the year........................



You know jack sh!t pal, we are talking about 1 player here no more, their is no trouble ( as much as you would love their to be ) at Seaton whatsoever, no-one's looking to jump.
One lad i know was approached by Rosewater & was offered $$ which he declined after a meeting with them last Tuesday.
He's obviously changed his mind since, probably after a bigger offer.
The club won't stand is his way providing his subs are payed, he's a player that doesn't like paying subs obviously.
The club has stated if theirs no sign of subs being payed you will not be playing until sign's are shown of payment, its simple pay the required $$ & you have the clearance signed, the lads attitude stinks anyway & i'd be more than happy to see the back of him & his dad.


I reckon you should make the trip down to Rosewater NM and give them a piece of your mind!! That will sort things out


No Mercy go down and see Chappy he will sought it out... im sure its not happening that way mate afta talkin to the coach out there bro..DARK kNIGHT WHY DONT YOU COME DOWN WITH HIM AND SOUGHT IT OUT????
woodublieve12
Coach
Posts: 17951
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:18 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Sydney Swans
Has thanked: 3235 times
Been thanked: 2576 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by woodublieve12 »

So was the story of Plymptons coach having a hissy fit and taking his bat and ball and walkin out! :lol:[/quote]

how the tide has turned now???
"Be curious, not judgmental""
User avatar
(S)aintbackline
Reserves
Posts: 750
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:32 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Tea Tree Gully
Location: MIA
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by (S)aintbackline »

NO-MERCY wrote:
(S)aintbackline wrote:I know for a fact that these players approached Rosewater (Very Reliable Source as well!), not Rosewater approaching them, so going by that maybe there is trouble at Seaton if players are looking to jump ship this early in the year........................



You know jack sh!t pal, we are talking about 1 player here no more, their is no trouble ( as much as you would love their to be ) at Seaton whatsoever, no-one's looking to jump.
One lad i know was approached by Rosewater & was offered $$ which he declined after a meeting with them last Tuesday.
He's obviously changed his mind since, probably after a bigger offer.
The club won't stand is his way providing his subs are payed, he's a player that doesn't like paying subs obviously.
The club has stated if theirs no sign of subs being payed you will not be playing until sign's are shown of payment, its simple pay the required $$ & you have the clearance signed, the lads attitude stinks anyway & i'd be more than happy to see the back of him & his dad.


Before jumping the Gun here no mercy, i know a little more than 'Jack Sh!t' and i wouldn't love there to be any trouble at Seaton mainly because i couldn't give a sh!t about them, My reply was just in response to your comment which was basically not factual.
User avatar
Footy Chick
Moderator
Posts: 27021
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:14 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: anywhere I want to be...
Has thanked: 1794 times
Been thanked: 2249 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by Footy Chick »

Is all this arguing over one little unknown player? Anyone would think you were fighting over Gary Ablett :roll:

Let's tone it down to a dull roar, eh?
Howgdizhe
Rookie
Posts: 150
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 4:58 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by Howgdizhe »

Footy Chick wrote:Is all this arguing over one little unknown player? Anyone would think you were fighting over Gary Ablett :roll:

Let's tone it down to a dull roar, eh?
Let em go FC, I think its hilarious! The player approached us! we approached the player! who f----n cares! Its like DAYSOFOURLIVES on here!
User avatar
boozehound
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1097
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 10:15 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Elizabeth
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by boozehound »

P.S........I hate Plympton and cant wait to kick a bag next time i play them. Hopefully we play them in a prelim...... ;)

Futhermore if you think every other side has the same lack of credibility to accept points you CLEARLY dont deserve you are mistaken. Aussie Rules Footy (particularly at amateur level) is about team spirit, courage, and mateship. Not about sharking points on a clerical error and then defending the SAAFL for handing them to you. As you would know most roles around a footy club are filled with volunteers and if they should be responsible for losing points for a simple clerical error then why would you do it..... We'll see how it pans out anyway I suppose but looking forward to the return bout sooooooo much more.
Harsh but fair.....
User avatar
Jabber
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1480
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:01 am
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Hawthorn
Team: Plympton
Been thanked: 15 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by Jabber »

boozehound wrote:P.S........I hate Plympton and cant wait to kick a bag next time i play them. Hopefully we play them in a prelim...... ;)

Futhermore if you think every other side has the same lack of credibility to accept points you CLEARLY dont deserve you are mistaken. Aussie Rules Footy (particularly at amateur level) is about team spirit, courage, and mateship. Not about sharking points on a clerical error and then defending the SAAFL for handing them to you. As you would know most roles around a footy club are filled with volunteers and if they should be responsible for losing points for a simple clerical error then why would you do it..... We'll see how it pans out anyway I suppose but looking forward to the return bout sooooooo much more.


Thats rubbish, no club would call the league and say 'oh no, take these points back, we don't want them'

Your a clown.
mypaddock
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1111
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:21 pm
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by mypaddock »

boozehound wrote:P.S........I hate Plympton and cant wait to kick a bag next time i play them. Hopefully we play them in a prelim...... ;)

Futhermore if you think every other side has the same lack of credibility to accept points you CLEARLY dont deserve you are mistaken. Aussie Rules Footy (particularly at amateur level) is about team spirit, courage, and mateship. Not about sharking points on a clerical error and then defending the SAAFL for handing them to you. As you would know most roles around a footy club are filled with volunteers and if they should be responsible for losing points for a simple clerical error then why would you do it..... We'll see how it pans out anyway I suppose but looking forward to the return bout sooooooo much more.


So where was your spirit and mateship, when you jumped ship and went to Elizabeth?? :lol:
User avatar
cossi11
League - Top 5
Posts: 3139
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:17 am
Team: Central District
Team: Richmond
Location: Everton FC
Has thanked: 58 times
Been thanked: 91 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by cossi11 »

NO-MERCY wrote:
(S)aintbackline wrote:I know for a fact that these players approached Rosewater (Very Reliable Source as well!), not Rosewater approaching them, so going by that maybe there is trouble at Seaton if players are looking to jump ship this early in the year........................



You know jack sh!t pal, we are talking about 1 player here no more, their is no trouble ( as much as you would love their to be ) at Seaton whatsoever, no-one's looking to jump.
One lad i know was approached by Rosewater & was offered $$ which he declined after a meeting with them last Tuesday.
He's obviously changed his mind since, probably after a bigger offer.
The club won't stand is his way providing his subs are payed, he's a player that doesn't like paying subs obviously.
The club has stated if theirs no sign of subs being payed you will not be playing until sign's are shown of payment, its simple pay the required $$ & you have the clearance signed, the lads attitude stinks anyway & i'd be more than happy to see the back of him & his dad.

*paid*
2020 AFL Premiers: Richmond 12.9.81 def Geelong 7.8.50
2019 AFL Premiers: Richmond 17.12.114 def Greater Western Sydney 3.7.25
2017 AFL Premiers: Adelaide 8.12.60 def by Richmond 16.12.108
2012 D5 Premiers: Brahma Lodge 24.15.159 def Hope Valley 7.13.55
Executive Member
Veteran
Posts: 3516
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:13 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 140 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by Executive Member »

cossi11 wrote:
NO-MERCY wrote:
(S)aintbackline wrote:I know for a fact that these players approached Rosewater (Very Reliable Source as well!), not Rosewater approaching them, so going by that maybe there is trouble at Seaton if players are looking to jump ship this early in the year........................



You know jack sh!t pal, we are talking about 1 player here no more, their is no trouble ( as much as you would love their to be ) at Seaton whatsoever, no-one's looking to jump.
One lad i know was approached by Rosewater & was offered $$ which he declined after a meeting with them last Tuesday.
He's obviously changed his mind since, probably after a bigger offer.
The club won't stand is his way providing his subs are payed, he's a player that doesn't like paying subs obviously.
The club has stated if theirs no sign of subs being payed you will not be playing until sign's are shown of payment, its simple pay the required $$ & you have the clearance signed, the lads attitude stinks anyway & i'd be more than happy to see the back of him & his dad.

*paid*[/quote]

ah
just like you after a game
8)
User avatar
cossi11
League - Top 5
Posts: 3139
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:17 am
Team: Central District
Team: Richmond
Location: Everton FC
Has thanked: 58 times
Been thanked: 91 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by cossi11 »

Executive Member wrote:
cossi11 wrote:
NO-MERCY wrote:
(S)aintbackline wrote:I know for a fact that these players approached Rosewater (Very Reliable Source as well!), not Rosewater approaching them, so going by that maybe there is trouble at Seaton if players are looking to jump ship this early in the year........................



You know jack sh!t pal, we are talking about 1 player here no more, their is no trouble ( as much as you would love their to be ) at Seaton whatsoever, no-one's looking to jump.
One lad i know was approached by Rosewater & was offered $$ which he declined after a meeting with them last Tuesday.
He's obviously changed his mind since, probably after a bigger offer.
The club won't stand is his way providing his subs are payed, he's a player that doesn't like paying subs obviously.
The club has stated if theirs no sign of subs being payed you will not be playing until sign's are shown of payment, its simple pay the required $$ & you have the clearance signed, the lads attitude stinks anyway & i'd be more than happy to see the back of him & his dad.

*paid*[/quote]

ah
just like you after a game
8)

do we have to go over this again... :roll:

stop causing trouble EM :D
2020 AFL Premiers: Richmond 12.9.81 def Geelong 7.8.50
2019 AFL Premiers: Richmond 17.12.114 def Greater Western Sydney 3.7.25
2017 AFL Premiers: Adelaide 8.12.60 def by Richmond 16.12.108
2012 D5 Premiers: Brahma Lodge 24.15.159 def Hope Valley 7.13.55
valleys07
Coach
Posts: 9304
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:08 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Hope Valley
Location: From a place much more pure than yours
Has thanked: 784 times
Been thanked: 1198 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 5 & 5R (2010)

Post by valleys07 »

Farbs wrote:
The Bartman wrote:
The Ash Man wrote:Plympton vs Blackfriars (Plympton)
Hectorville vs Smithfield (Daly Oval)
Elizabeth vs Rosewater (Argana Park)
Hope Valley vs Adelaide Lutheran (Hope Valley)
Brahma Lodge vs North Haven (Brahma Lodge)

I'm back from O/S now LM so I wont miss any more tips


I'll have the same as this chap thanks LM.


I'll have the same too thanks LM


Me too LM
“Think of me like Yoda, but instead of being little and green I wear suits and I'm awesome. I'm your bro—I'm Broda!”

HOGG Shield 2015 Division I Premiers.
HOGG Shield 2017 Premier League Premiers.
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests