by tiger07andbeyond » Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 am
Media Park wrote:You'd sort of hope to finish third in such a tightly contested year- get the cheap win over the fourth placed side for a bit of momentum.
by daicos » Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:15 pm
by Boston Prodigy » Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:56 pm
MarblePark wrote:Kaden will miss a few with a hammy in the second quarter.
by daicos » Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:40 pm
by acockfromwayback » Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:42 pm
Boston Prodigy wrote:MarblePark wrote:Kaden will miss a few with a hammy in the second quarter.
Na was just a very severe cocked thigh and damaged his groin again, will be a incredible effort if he plays this week.![]()
My tips in both PLFL and AFL are looking extreamly ordinary this week !![]()
![]()
by overloaded » Sun Apr 25, 2010 1:46 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by fev_99 » Sun Apr 25, 2010 2:36 pm
by daicos » Sun Apr 25, 2010 6:54 pm
by Cove07 » Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:41 pm
by daicos » Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:26 pm
Cove07 wrote:There was no mallice intended in the collision involving young Treager considering a) the wayback player didn't even see Treager coming in from the side and b) the wayback player took possession of the ball on impact. It was just one of those unfortunate collisions that can happen in a game of football, I wish him all the best with his recovery.
by Dermie » Mon Apr 26, 2010 11:22 am
daicos wrote:Cove07 wrote:There was no mallice intended in the collision involving young Treager considering a) the wayback player didn't even see Treager coming in from the side and b) the wayback player took possession of the ball on impact. It was just one of those unfortunate collisions that can happen in a game of football, I wish him all the best with his recovery.
Thats not how I saw it. a) Kayser left his man of half back to hit the contest (kid and ball) b) the kid was well and truly at the ball when hit and was on his knees or vey close to it. c) no one 'came in from the side' .
I know you are only going into bat for your team mate but tell the truth son.
So Tasmans looked the best team in round 1 by far. They are certain of finals, can they make the double chance? I think so
by daicos » Mon Apr 26, 2010 11:55 am
by overloaded » Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:18 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by sherrin22 » Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:10 pm
by daicos » Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:31 pm
sherrin22 wrote:regarding the hit, kayser had the ball so how was it that treager was coming up with the ball Daicos??
was no malice in it at all. i'm sure he would have a great record as one of the cleanest players..
by Media Park » Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:43 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by One Eyed » Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:47 pm
by daicos » Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:55 pm
by Boston Prodigy » Mon Apr 26, 2010 3:47 pm
by OldCooper » Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:34 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |