Mal Michael to Essendon!

[THE BOSS]

We haven't finished yet, rumour has it that Mathew Clarke & Stuart Dew might get a phone call yet.
With a few player's back this year from injury & of course BIG MAL the Bomber's will be a much improved out fit this year.

GO THE BOMBERS !!!!

[sydney-dog]

Mal

Not you,

Memo to Mal Michael

[PhilG]

..

[Roylion]

I'm probably going to regret this - but I have to address this just once more.

As I have said previously, I haven't spouted provactive statements to engender a response.

Yes you did - multiple times [/quote]

Errr...no I didn't.

I challenged your provactive statements that you made against Fitzroy, Leon Weigard and Dyson Hore-Lacy....statements/opinions I felt were unjust and showed a remarkable amount of ignorance. I repeatedly asked for specific hard evidence to back up your statements, which you were unable to provide. I also stated my case clearly, backed it up with evidence to support my argument (which you were unable to refute). At no point did I call you insulting names nor "did I tell you to shut up and accept I'm right", unlike the reverse. My responses to you were neither inflammatory, off-topic, insulting, or otherwise inappropriate messages for the topic (Fitzroy) that was being discussed. Therefore under the generally accepted definition of an Internet "troll", I fail to see how I could be one. If you think I am then I suggest you find out what the term "troll" as regards to the Internet actually means. Engaging in debate about football on a football forum is not necessarily "trolling".

Nor have I posted inflammatory, messages designed intentionally to annoy or antagonize.

Yes you did - multiple times.

No doubt my challenging your arguments did annoy you. However as I said, I attempted to back up all my statements with reasoning and evidence to explain why I disagreed with you. You, on the other hand did not, even though I asked you repeatedly to do so. Despite your statements that the evidence would be forthcoming sooner rather than later, it has still not appeared.

You are a troll (against me). Case closed.

It appears that your definition of a "troll" is anyone that disagrees with your statements or engages in any sort of debate with you. That is not my definition. See above.

[GWW]

Deja vu

[sydney-dog]

THE BOSS

Brisbane, WB, Port Adel all ahd a bigger inkury year then the bombers but finished higher

all that this year will prove is that sheed's once again bluffed the footy world, the bombers will miss the 8, as their game plan is too reliant on Matty Llyod

the bombers still had a core of enough good players going around last year, they are soft

[Blue Boy]

THE BOSS

Brisbane, WB, Port Adel all ahd a bigger inkury year then the bombers but finished higher

all that this year will prove is that sheed's once again bluffed the footy world, the bombers will miss the 8, as their game plan is too reliant on Matty Llyod

the bombers still had a core of enough good players going around last year, they are soft

No they dont have a good core of players at all - Hird, Lucas, Fletcher, Llyod - then the rest !!!

With Lloyd out all year and not much of Hird they were always going to struggle !!!

[PhilG]

..

[Dutchy]

Deja vu

No, GWW - it goes no further. He just doesn't get it. Every time he posts he antagonises me. That's his intention. He just won't admit it - that's all. He's seeking my attention and he's not going to get it. I had a feeling I was wasting my time. But then that's a troll all over. Not worth the effort. Especially when they deliberately get definitions wrong to avoid the obvious.

Anyway - we move on.....

(PS - and if Roylion responds to this with more of the same he'll prove my point)

[PhilG]

..

[stan]

Ok people move along nothing to see here.