by hearts on fire » Sun Feb 14, 2010 8:07 pm
by Turbo » Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:41 pm
Mr66 wrote:Might be the surprise packet, fourth to eighth
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:15 am
by wycbloods » Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:42 pm
Pidge wrote:Sydney WILL make the 8
by Turbo » Tue Feb 16, 2010 6:57 pm
wycbloods wrote:Pidge wrote:Sydney WILL make the 8
Dreaming
by stan » Sat Feb 20, 2010 2:45 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:28 pm
by stan » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:32 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Sydney has increased their ruck depth over the pre season with Seaby and Mumford. It won't be hard for Bradshaw to be more consistent than Hall.
by hearts on fire » Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:48 pm
by stan » Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:01 pm
hearts on fire wrote:The Swans look to have a lot of small bodies, looked very small compared to the Saints.
and how bald is Kennelly!!
by bazza1 » Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:08 pm
stan wrote:hearts on fire wrote:The Swans look to have a lot of small bodies, looked very small compared to the Saints.
and how bald is Kennelly!!
Must have the baldness runing through the family.
I saw Goodes playing up forward alot, if he stays there which im not sure about, and with Bradshaw, they will have a nice combo down there. There backline isnt all bad either, Roberts-thompson, Bolton and Grundy back there look likely types.
Mumford is still young and Seaby goes alright but is coming to the end of his career. Also looking at there midfield they have some good players through there.
They will surpise a few, still I have picked them 9 - 12 and Im sticking with that.
by stan » Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:10 am
bazza1 wrote:stan wrote:hearts on fire wrote:The Swans look to have a lot of small bodies, looked very small compared to the Saints.
and how bald is Kennelly!!
Must have the baldness runing through the family.
I saw Goodes playing up forward alot, if he stays there which im not sure about, and with Bradshaw, they will have a nice combo down there. There backline isnt all bad either, Roberts-thompson, Bolton and Grundy back there look likely types.
Mumford is still young and Seaby goes alright but is coming to the end of his career. Also looking at there midfield they have some good players through there.
They will surpise a few, still I have picked them 9 - 12 and Im sticking with that.
Seaby turns 26 this year Stan, still got a few years left him I think!
by Rik E Boy » Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:50 am
bazza1 wrote:
Seaby turns 26 this year Stan, still got a few years left him I think!
by stan » Fri Mar 05, 2010 1:33 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:bazza1 wrote:
Seaby turns 26 this year Stan, still got a few years left him I think!
Doesn't matter how much you wash them a spud is still a spud.
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Fri Mar 05, 2010 3:01 pm
stan wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:bazza1 wrote:
Seaby turns 26 this year Stan, still got a few years left him I think!
Doesn't matter how much you wash them a spud is still a spud.
regards,
REB
As for Ruckmen you might want to put your hand up because with Mumford at Sydney you have Ottens as number 1 and blake as his back up. Normally a fearsome duo, but Ottens has struggled with injuries as we all know.
by blink » Fri Mar 05, 2010 3:59 pm
stan wrote:As for Ruckmen you might want to put your hand up because with Mumford at Sydney you have Ottens as number 1 and blake as his back up. Normally a fearsome duo, but Ottens has struggled with injuries as we all know.
by hearts on fire » Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:52 pm
by Rik E Boy » Thu Mar 11, 2010 7:30 pm
blink wrote:stan wrote:As for Ruckmen you might want to put your hand up because with Mumford at Sydney you have Ottens as number 1 and blake as his back up. Normally a fearsome duo, but Ottens has struggled with injuries as we all know.
Geelong have proved your point stan - that you don't need a gun ruck division to be a successful team!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |