SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Adelaide Footy League Talk
Locked

Who will win the 2010 Flag

CBCOC
14
6%
Kilburn
12
5%
Mitcham
12
5%
Old Ignatians
20
9%
PAOC
32
15%
Para Hills
37
17%
Portland
21
10%
Scotch OC
6
3%
Seaton Ramblers
47
21%
SMOSH
19
9%
 
Total votes: 220

User avatar
Iron Fist
Veteran
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:06 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Portland
Location: thunder train
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 13 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by Iron Fist »

Choccies wrote:
Iron Fist wrote:
Choccies wrote:How's the turn out been at Kilburn pre-season so far this year ?? Heard on the grapevine that numbers equalled 8 the other night.... That's not a good sign surely ??


The rumour I heard was 12 and that the coach has a $60,000 budget to play with!

More then likely all rumour though


12 still aint much better than 8 though !!!
You reckon if he spends $0 of that budget that he gets to keep it ?? ;)


its not at all
maybe thats his plan, his bonus is what he doesnt spend?? :lol:
get on board the thunder train!!!
User avatar
Choccies
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4083
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:36 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Golden Grove
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by Choccies »

Iron Fist wrote:
Choccies wrote:
Iron Fist wrote:
Choccies wrote:How's the turn out been at Kilburn pre-season so far this year ?? Heard on the grapevine that numbers equalled 8 the other night.... That's not a good sign surely ??


The rumour I heard was 12 and that the coach has a $60,000 budget to play with!

More then likely all rumour though


12 still aint much better than 8 though !!!
You reckon if he spends $0 of that budget that he gets to keep it ?? ;)


its not at all
maybe thats his plan, his bonus is what he doesnt spend?? :lol:


Wonder if there's any Kilburn folk on here and if they're concerned ?? What happens if they cant field a B grade side ??
I love grapes. With grapes, you always get another chance. You know, if you have a crappy apple or a peach, you’re stuck with that crappy piece of fruit. If you have a crappy grape, no problem-just move on to the next. ‘Grapes: The Fruit of Hope.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15661
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 897 times
Been thanked: 1407 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by Jimmy_041 »

My view is that its Para Hills and the rest and have no idea who else will be up there until the first few games. Everyone thought Lutherans would be strong after they flogged Greenacres in the first D4 game last year but it didn't happen.
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
catchisthecry
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1397
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 1:07 pm
Team: Glenelg
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by catchisthecry »

Jimmy_041 wrote:My view is that its Para Hills and the rest and have no idea who else will be up there until the first few games. Everyone thought Lutherans would be strong after they flogged Greenacres in the first D4 game last year but it didn't happen.


5 points!! Flogged em ;)
Point taken tho... Generally round 5 or 6, ladder starts to take shape.
catchisthecry
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1397
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 1:07 pm
Team: Glenelg
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by catchisthecry »

I think PAC and CBC will go well in Div 3.
In my opinion stronger sides than the Mitcham and Portland who went up the year before.
Good luck to all!
User avatar
Iron Fist
Veteran
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:06 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Portland
Location: thunder train
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 13 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by Iron Fist »

catchisthecry wrote:I think PAC and CBC will go well in Div 3.
In my opinion stronger sides than the Mitcham and Portland who went up the year before.
Good luck to all!


I think they will do alright aswell
may still struggle against the more physical sides like Para Hills though
get on board the thunder train!!!
blackcat
Under 16s
Posts: 453
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:24 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Para Hills
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by blackcat »

Iron Fist wrote:
catchisthecry wrote:I think PAC and CBC will go well in Div 3.
In my opinion stronger sides than the Mitcham and Portland who went up the year before.
Good luck to all!


I think they will do alright aswell
may still struggle against the more physical sides like Para Hills though

Para Hills A physical side???????
baseballbat
Mini-League
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:58 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Essendon

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by baseballbat »

blackcat wrote:
Iron Fist wrote:
catchisthecry wrote:I think PAC and CBC will go well in Div 3.
In my opinion stronger sides than the Mitcham and Portland who went up the year before.
Good luck to all!


I think they will do alright aswell
may still struggle against the more physical sides like Para Hills though

Para Hills A physical side???????


para hills, cbc, pac, portland, mitcham, scotch will all be g8 sides this yr and gf between phills and portland
threestars
Rookie
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:52 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by threestars »

I think a lot of members are overlooking Iggies this year. They have only lost Tyson but have gained Joe Pedler and Stephen White - two key position players combined with a good midfield of Frinsdorf, Tomich and Whiteman (provided he plays) should be a force to be reckon with.

However, PAC will be strong and I expect Mitcham to push for Top 3 as well.
baseballbat
Mini-League
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:58 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Essendon

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by baseballbat »

threestars wrote:I think a lot of members are overlooking Iggies this year. They have only lost Tyson but have gained Joe Pedler and Stephen White - two key position players combined with a good midfield of Frinsdorf, Tomich and Whiteman (provided he plays) should be a force to be reckon with.

However, PAC will be strong and I expect Mitcham to push for Top 3 as well.



good point 3stars - they will be good. will match those other top sides. still cant see anyone challenging phills or portland tho. scotch always one to watch. cant see anyone out of top 6 challenging tho
User avatar
Iron Fist
Veteran
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:06 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Portland
Location: thunder train
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 13 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by Iron Fist »

blackcat wrote:
Iron Fist wrote:
catchisthecry wrote:I think PAC and CBC will go well in Div 3.
In my opinion stronger sides than the Mitcham and Portland who went up the year before.
Good luck to all!


I think they will do alright aswell
may still struggle against the more physical sides like Para Hills though

Para Hills A physical side???????


compared to some of the other sides I would say they are!
get on board the thunder train!!!
User avatar
Felch
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4123
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:47 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Portland
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by Felch »

threestars wrote:I think a lot of members are overlooking Iggies this year. They have only lost Tyson but have gained Joe Pedler and Stephen White - two key position players combined with a good midfield of Frinsdorf, Tomich and Whiteman (provided he plays) should be a force to be reckon with.

However, PAC will be strong and I expect Mitcham to push for Top 3 as well.


Agree with Iggies. Tyson is a huge loss though, but if they get their best side on the park most weeks they will go ok. Muck like us last year, depth was a problem for Iggies too.

Not sure on Mitcham. Heard they may have lost a ruckman to Blackwood.

I think Seaton are in a similar position to SMOSH last year - they are expected to do well, and the pressure is on. Para Hills will be right in it again, as most years. SMOSH will be hard to beat too.

Now, im not sure who Baseballbat is, but im almost certain he is trying to deflect some heat off Seaton. Very clever tactic boys ;)
Seaton are the favourites for D3, no amount of 'pumping up' other teams will change that. They are the side that everyone else will be measuring themselves against, in the early rounds at least.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15661
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 897 times
Been thanked: 1407 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by Jimmy_041 »

Felch wrote:
threestars wrote:I think a lot of members are overlooking Iggies this year. They have only lost Tyson but have gained Joe Pedler and Stephen White - two key position players combined with a good midfield of Frinsdorf, Tomich and Whiteman (provided he plays) should be a force to be reckon with.

However, PAC will be strong and I expect Mitcham to push for Top 3 as well.


Agree with Iggies. Tyson is a huge loss though, but if they get their best side on the park most weeks they will go ok. Muck like us last year, depth was a problem for Iggies too.

Not sure on Mitcham. Heard they may have lost a ruckman to Blackwood.

I think Seaton are in a similar position to SMOSH last year - they are expected to do well, and the pressure is on. Para Hills will be right in it again, as most years. SMOSH will be hard to beat too.

Now, im not sure who Baseballbat is, but im almost certain he is trying to deflect some heat off Seaton. Very clever tactic boys ;)
Seaton are the favourites for D3, no amount of 'pumping up' other teams will change that. They are the side that everyone else will be measuring themselves against, in the early rounds at least.


Almost like he trying to assist them Felch ;)
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15661
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 897 times
Been thanked: 1407 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by Jimmy_041 »

Footy aces target of blackmail bid

Adelaide Now
4th February 2010
A NINE News sports reader and a former AFL grand final player, have allegedly been the victims of a blackmail attempt by a Seaton man, a court has heard.


Ramblers have some unusual recruiting tactics.......
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
Felch
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4123
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:47 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Portland
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by Felch »

Jimmy_041 wrote:
Footy aces target of blackmail bid

Adelaide Now
4th February 2010
A NINE News sports reader and a former AFL grand final player, have allegedly been the victims of a blackmail attempt by a Seaton man, a court has heard.


Ramblers have some unusual recruiting tactics.......


:lol:
baseballbat
Mini-League
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:58 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Essendon

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by baseballbat »

Felch wrote:
threestars wrote:I think a lot of members are overlooking Iggies this year. They have only lost Tyson but have gained Joe Pedler and Stephen White - two key position players combined with a good midfield of Frinsdorf, Tomich and Whiteman (provided he plays) should be a force to be reckon with.

However, PAC will be strong and I expect Mitcham to push for Top 3 as well.


Agree with Iggies. Tyson is a huge loss though, but if they get their best side on the park most weeks they will go ok. Muck like us last year, depth was a problem for Iggies too.

Not sure on Mitcham. Heard they may have lost a ruckman to Blackwood.

I think Seaton are in a similar position to SMOSH last year - they are expected to do well, and the pressure is on. Para Hills will be right in it again, as most years. SMOSH will be hard to beat too.

Now, im not sure who Baseballbat is, but im almost certain he is trying to deflect some heat off Seaton. Very clever tactic boys ;)
Seaton are the favourites for D3, no amount of 'pumping up' other teams will change that. They are the side that everyone else will be measuring themselves against, in the early rounds at least.



idiiot, nothing to do with seaton is baseball bat. bit closer to jimmys side of town though. picked top 6 on who i thought thats it
User avatar
Felch
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4123
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:47 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Portland
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by Felch »

baseballbat wrote:
Felch wrote:
threestars wrote:I think a lot of members are overlooking Iggies this year. They have only lost Tyson but have gained Joe Pedler and Stephen White - two key position players combined with a good midfield of Frinsdorf, Tomich and Whiteman (provided he plays) should be a force to be reckon with.

However, PAC will be strong and I expect Mitcham to push for Top 3 as well.


Agree with Iggies. Tyson is a huge loss though, but if they get their best side on the park most weeks they will go ok. Muck like us last year, depth was a problem for Iggies too.

Not sure on Mitcham. Heard they may have lost a ruckman to Blackwood.

I think Seaton are in a similar position to SMOSH last year - they are expected to do well, and the pressure is on. Para Hills will be right in it again, as most years. SMOSH will be hard to beat too.

Now, im not sure who Baseballbat is, but im almost certain he is trying to deflect some heat off Seaton. Very clever tactic boys ;)
Seaton are the favourites for D3, no amount of 'pumping up' other teams will change that. They are the side that everyone else will be measuring themselves against, in the early rounds at least.



idiiot, nothing to do with seaton is baseball bat. bit closer to jimmys side of town though


Yeah, ok... :roll:
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15661
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 897 times
Been thanked: 1407 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by Jimmy_041 »

How do you know where I live bb?

I move around so Michael Atkinson cant know me
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
User avatar
aceman
Coach
Posts: 5481
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:38 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Location: At home by the fire with Rupert at my feet.

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by aceman »

Jimmy_041 wrote:
Footy [b]ace's target of blackmail bid[/b]

Adelaide Now
4th February 2010
A NINE News sports reader and a former AFL grand final player, have allegedly been the victims of a blackmail attempt by a Seaton man, a court has heard.


Ramblers have some unusual recruiting tactics.......



Heh, leave me outta this one!
Always behind the 8 ball
User avatar
stretch
Member
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 8:12 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Mitcham
Has thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Re: SAAFL Div 3 & 3R (2010)

Post by stretch »

Felch wrote:
threestars wrote:I think a lot of members are overlooking Iggies this year. They have only lost Tyson but have gained Joe Pedler and Stephen White - two key position players combined with a good midfield of Frinsdorf, Tomich and Whiteman (provided he plays) should be a force to be reckon with.

However, PAC will be strong and I expect Mitcham to push for Top 3 as well.


Agree with Iggies. Tyson is a huge loss though, but if they get their best side on the park most weeks they will go ok. Muck like us last year, depth was a problem for Iggies too.

Not sure on Mitcham. Heard they may have lost a ruckman to Blackwood.

I think Seaton are in a similar position to SMOSH last year - they are expected to do well, and the pressure is on. Para Hills will be right in it again, as most years. SMOSH will be hard to beat too.

Now, im not sure who Baseballbat is, but im almost certain he is trying to deflect some heat off Seaton. Very clever tactic boys ;)
Seaton are the favourites for D3, no amount of 'pumping up' other teams will change that. They are the side that everyone else will be measuring themselves against, in the early rounds at least.


Not sure where you'd have heard that. Have had good numbers out to trainings and keep seeing all the familiar faces. Not aware of any losses.
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 81 guests