Kent Kingsley delisted

Talk on the national game

Kent Kingsley delisted

Postby MW » Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:51 am

A bit harsh? Will he get picked up again?
MW
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13996
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:55 pm
Has liked: 2789 times
Been liked: 2057 times

Postby MightyEagles » Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:56 am

No and will come back to the Eagles. :D
WOOOOO, Premiers 1993, 2006 and 2011!
Eagles - P 528 W 320 L 205 D 3 W% 60.89
WFC - P 575 W 160 L 411 D 4 W% 28.17
WTFC - P 1568 W 702 L 841 D 25 W% 45.56
Total - P 2671 W 1183 L 1457 D 32 W% 44.88
3 Flags - 1 Club
MightyEagles
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11771
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:38 pm
Location: The MightyEagles Memorial Timekeepers Box
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 12 times
Grassroots Team: United Eagles

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:19 am

i think you will find that around the time of the 2nd semi final for the reserves in which KENT KINGSLEY was participating in he told the club that he wanted to leave, so he jumped before he was cut, but he was always going.

heard him on the radio last week with dumb and dumber and he didnt think his form was all that bad and dumb and dumber felt sorry for him about the way he was treated by the club.

he had his chances to make a mark on the competition but didnt do it all that consistently
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60931
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13430 times
Been liked: 4640 times

Postby am Bays » Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:29 am

Will he really come back to Adelaide when his off-field business interests are all in Melbourne......
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19726
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2122 times

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:33 am

he is back in adelaide at the moment visiting his parents.

he would come back to play AFL, but i think his days are gone at AFL level
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60931
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13430 times
Been liked: 4640 times

Postby Brad » Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:40 pm

Well theres talk he will end up at Richmond :x :x

Along with other rumoured player - Cupido, Adkins and the Cloke brothers :roll:

Please don't do this to me Richmond!
Brad
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1795
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:33 pm
Location: Ceduna
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: Crystal Brook

Postby stan » Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:57 pm

Cloke brothers, christ, if you got travis it would be ok, but if you got cameron and jason, well then you might as well pick up kingsley as well.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15514
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1318 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:04 pm

go RICHMOND pick up those 3 idiots and you will get the SPOON!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60931
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13430 times
Been liked: 4640 times

Postby Blue Boy » Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:04 pm

Are any of the three mentioned in front of Gaspar ???
It is what it is !!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Location: Any where between here and there
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Postby Punk Rooster » Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:26 pm

Brad wrote:Well theres talk he will end up at Richmond :x :x

Along with other rumoured player - Cupido, Adkins and the Cloke brothers :roll:

Please don't do this to me Richmond!

Cupido's shadow would be too heavy for the AFL...
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Postby PhilG » Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:58 am

..
Last edited by PhilG on Mon May 14, 2007 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
PhilG
 

Postby mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Nov 04, 2006 9:19 am

well when you add 3 useless lads, one of which is obese, they would be unlikely to get a game anyway, but if they did they would be down with the BLUES battling for the spoon.
User avatar
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
 
Posts: 60931
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: at the TAB
Has liked: 13430 times
Been liked: 4640 times

Kant Kicksley

Postby Rik E Boy » Sun Nov 05, 2006 12:34 pm

The question has to be asked. Is Kent Kingsley useless or was he forced to play in a position and a role that didn't suit him? Does he make too much cash to really GAF?

Firstly, Kent's role at Geelong. Since Gary Ablett Snr retired, the Geelong forward line has become an absolute basketcase with many footballers dying and withering on the line as ball after ball gets kicked over their heads by a midfield that is still quite inexperienced and lacking a bit of pace. Lace out passes to a Geelong forward are a rare commodity now that Hocking, Toby, Couch and now Riccardi have pulled up stumps. Some of the blokes who have been burnt include David Mensch, Jason Mooney, Mitchell White, David Haines, Ronnie Burns, Derek Hall, Matthew McCarthy and now you can add Kingsley's name to that bloody lengthy list. Kingsley was the best of those forwards with perhaps the exception of Burns and Mensch (White of course was better but not at Geelong). Kingsley kicked over 50 goals in a season on three occasions in a period when Geelong were not reaching the standards of the previous decade. Repeatedly I stood up for Kingsley because in my view, he was being forced to play a Barry Hall type role when clearly he is not that type of player. Anyone who can average close to three goals a game in a dysfunctional forward line does have talent.

Which brings me to the second part of the equation, the desire. Kingsley is a successfull businessman who doesn't really need to play football. The only thing that would keep him in the league is a burning desire to play in a premiership side. Is Kent just a talented club man at the next level down or can he be that professional athlete that he was, up until this season from hell? I believe that Kent always had the desire but that desire leaked away rapidly when the goals dried up and he found himself in the Magoos.

Plenty of people are laughing at the thought of Richmond picking up Kingsley just because Kingsley has had a bad season at Geelong. In case you haven't noticed, he had a few mates and Kingsley is one of the scapegoats..the supporters would tear down Cat Park if Kingsley was retained LOL. But at Richmond they have a Matthew Richardson and he must command the best defender. At Richmond they also have Nathan Brown so there goes number two. Your big defender on Richo and your quickest on Brown so that leaves your second best tall or a younger defender perhaps on Kingsley the number three forward. I also thought that Essendon might be interested in Kent for similar reasons. Kingsley as a number three forward would be a dangerous proposition indeed, Kingsley as the number one forward just doesn't work as it has been proven at Catland. I believe Kent still has something to offer at the right club.

IF he can be ar5ed!

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28572
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1885 times

It's the eye of the Tiger it's the thrill of the fight...

Postby Rik E Boy » Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:31 pm

It seems Plough might agree with me...

Image

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28572
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1885 times

Re: Kant Kicksley

Postby blink » Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:48 pm

Rik E Boy wrote: Kingsley is a successfull businessman



Forgive my ignorance REB - This is changing the topic slightly, but I have noticed often that you and others have mentioned Kingsley in various threads as being a successful business man and having several off-field business interests and income. I am just curious as to what these are???
User avatar
blink
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1709
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:13 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Kant Kicksley

Postby Punk Rooster » Thu Nov 09, 2006 7:02 pm

blink wrote:Forgive my ignorance REB - This is changing the topic slightly, but I have noticed often that you and others have mentioned Kingsley in various threads as being a successful business man and having several off-field business interests and income. I am just curious as to what these are???

Selling dreams of a Geelong Premiership to Cats fans?
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: Kant Kicksley

Postby am Bays » Thu Nov 09, 2006 7:35 pm

blink wrote:
Rik E Boy wrote: Kingsley is a successfull businessman



Forgive my ignorance REB - This is changing the topic slightly, but I have noticed often that you and others have mentioned Kingsley in various threads as being a successful business man and having several off-field business interests and income. I am just curious as to what these are???


IIRC two of his "external" income streams are real estate and the rag trade....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19726
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2122 times

Re: Kant Kicksley

Postby Aerie » Thu Nov 09, 2006 9:15 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:
blink wrote:
Rik E Boy wrote: Kingsley is a successfull businessman



Forgive my ignorance REB - This is changing the topic slightly, but I have noticed often that you and others have mentioned Kingsley in various threads as being a successful business man and having several off-field business interests and income. I am just curious as to what these are???


IIRC two of his "external" income streams are real estate and the rag trade....


He's a successful business man - intersting article here from earlier in the year: http://www.realfooty.theage.com.au/articles/2006/04/14/1144521507478.html
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5748
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 186 times
Been liked: 590 times

Re: Kant Kicksley

Postby Rik E Boy » Fri Nov 10, 2006 12:52 pm

Punk Rooster wrote:
blink wrote:Forgive my ignorance REB - This is changing the topic slightly, but I have noticed often that you and others have mentioned Kingsley in various threads as being a successful business man and having several off-field business interests and income. I am just curious as to what these are???

Selling dreams of a Geelong Premiership to Cats fans?


He has a partnership with Anthony Rocca......

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28572
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1885 times


Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |