Is it over for Rann?
- Psyber
- Coach
- Posts: 12247
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Hahndorf
- Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 405 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
Agreed Gozu and SS, a balanced and sound summation.
The basic issue is whether or not we, the voters, like the way he is running the state.
I haven't been back here long enough to have a strong opinion on that...
The team from the desalination plant answered my questions about brine dispersal satisfactorily, assuming what they said was true.
I'm unsure which is the best choice for the RAH, and haven't worked out whether the inconvenience of trams in North Terrace has enough balancing benefit..
The basic issue is whether or not we, the voters, like the way he is running the state.
I haven't been back here long enough to have a strong opinion on that...
The team from the desalination plant answered my questions about brine dispersal satisfactorily, assuming what they said was true.
I'm unsure which is the best choice for the RAH, and haven't worked out whether the inconvenience of trams in North Terrace has enough balancing benefit..
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
-
overloaded
- 2009 Punting Comp Winner
- Posts: 6909
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 9:48 am
- Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
- Location: far queue
Re: Is it over for Rann?
I was amused during Rann's press conference yesterday when Mike Smithson (I think) asked him if he had been trufthfull at all times regarding the matter (or something to that effect) to which he replied with an answer to a completely different question. Not one of the journo's pointed out that he didnt answer the question, he has their bluff and they are scared of him.
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
- mick
- League - Best 21
- Posts: 1639
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:34 am
- Team: North Adelaide
- Location: On the banks of the Murray
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
Gozu wrote:If only The Advertiser had more journalists like Tory Shepherd:
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/stor ... 01,00.html
Agree very good piece
- aceman
- Coach
- Posts: 5481
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:38 pm
- Team: North Adelaide
- Location: At home by the fire with Rupert at my feet.
Re: Is it over for Rann?
overloaded wrote:I was amused during Rann's press conference yesterday when Mike Smithson (I think) [b]asked him if he had been trufthfull at all times regarding the matter (or[/b] something to that effect) to which he replied with an answer to a completely different question. Not one of the journo's pointed out that he didnt answer the question, he has their bluff and they are scared of him.
Now he's enough to make you feel sick with his insipid smerk, young Mike.
Always behind the 8 ball
-
Dogwatcher
- Coach
- Posts: 29318
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Elizabeth
- Location: The Bronx
- Has thanked: 1425 times
- Been thanked: 1153 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
overloaded wrote: Not one of the journo's pointed out that he didnt answer the question, he has their bluff and they are scared of him.
Actually, if you listened to the whole thing, you'd have heard a few voices pipe up and try and get him back on to their message. Mr Rann, like all modern day pollies, is very clever at answering the question they want to and talking long enough that another question will pop up if one they don't want to answer pops up.
There's not too much team-work in a media scrum and all journos have their own agendas (notwithstanding the fact they may actually be interested in hearing a question like that being answered) dependin upon what their bosses want.
Questions can easily get brushed aside by pollies for that matter.
You'll also notice that Mike finished the presser and was definite about that. He'd put out his message, added some phrases that will have others thinking about whether Chantelois is genuine, or even right in the head, and was not going to answer any more questions.
The journos are not as bluffed as you might think.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
- Gozu
- Coach
- Posts: 14138
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:35 am
- Team: Norwood
- Been thanked: 686 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
Psyber wrote:Agreed Gozu and SS, a balanced and sound summation.
The basic issue is whether or not we, the voters, like the way he is running the state.
I haven't been back here long enough to have a strong opinion on that...
The team from the desalination plant answered my questions about brine dispersal satisfactorily, assuming what they said was true.
I'm unsure which is the best choice for the RAH, and haven't worked out whether the inconvenience of trams in North Terrace has enough balancing benefit..
This is off topic and although I admit I haven't given the whole trams thing the greatest attention but can anyone explain the point of having a tram line running down Port Rd almost alongside the train line? If the trains already cover the route and the train line is currently being upgraded what is the point of the trams?
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
-
Dogwatcher
- Coach
- Posts: 29318
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Elizabeth
- Location: The Bronx
- Has thanked: 1425 times
- Been thanked: 1153 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
Yeah, umm, right off track Gozu.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
-
interested observer
- League Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1143
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:05 am
- Team: Hawthorn
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
Gozu wrote:Psyber wrote:Agreed Gozu and SS, a balanced and sound summation.
The basic issue is whether or not we, the voters, like the way he is running the state.
I haven't been back here long enough to have a strong opinion on that...
The team from the desalination plant answered my questions about brine dispersal satisfactorily, assuming what they said was true.
I'm unsure which is the best choice for the RAH, and haven't worked out whether the inconvenience of trams in North Terrace has enough balancing benefit..
This is off topic and although I admit I haven't given the whole trams thing the greatest attention but can anyone explain the point of having a tram line running down Port Rd almost alongside the train line? If the trains already cover the route and the train line is currently being upgraded what is the point of the trams?
Not quite the route we are covering here...
- Jimmy_041
- Coach
- Posts: 15661
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Port District
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 1407 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
Dogwatcher wrote:I enjoyed that editorial.
Hit the nail on the head. Finally, someone has the guts to write what is going on here.
I couldnt give 2 hoots whether he did it or not. I just enjoy the fact that there are 400 media minders working 24/7 and Media Mike is squirming
I said to a mate today - a couple of months ago, who would have thought they would be in a tizz
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
- Gozu
- Coach
- Posts: 14138
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:35 am
- Team: Norwood
- Been thanked: 686 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
Jimmy_041 wrote:I said to a mate today - a couple of months ago, who would have thought they would be in a tizz
Exactly which is why I think this whole thing is politically motivated.
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
- southee
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4961
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 1:00 am
- Team: South Adelaide
- Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
- Has thanked: 870 times
- Been thanked: 124 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
interested observer wrote:Gozu wrote:Psyber wrote:Agreed Gozu and SS, a balanced and sound summation.
The basic issue is whether or not we, the voters, like the way he is running the state.
I haven't been back here long enough to have a strong opinion on that...
The team from the desalination plant answered my questions about brine dispersal satisfactorily, assuming what they said was true.
I'm unsure which is the best choice for the RAH, and haven't worked out whether the inconvenience of trams in North Terrace has enough balancing benefit..
This is off topic and although I admit I haven't given the whole trams thing the greatest attention but can anyone explain the point of having a tram line running down Port Rd almost alongside the train line? If the trains already cover the route and the train line is currently being upgraded what is the point of the trams?
Not quite the route we are covering here...
Dont think the tram line is the only thing getting laid in Adelaide by the government....
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
-
Dogwatcher
- Coach
- Posts: 29318
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Elizabeth
- Location: The Bronx
- Has thanked: 1425 times
- Been thanked: 1153 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
Didn't need a poll to tell you that either.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
- southee
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4961
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 1:00 am
- Team: South Adelaide
- Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
- Has thanked: 870 times
- Been thanked: 124 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
Gozu wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:I said to a mate today - a couple of months ago, who would have thought they would be in a tizz
Exactly which is why I think this whole thing is politically motivated.
You would Gozu!!!! Dont think the majority of the public do though!!!
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
- Dog_ger
- Coach
- Posts: 6536
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:25 pm
- Team: Central District
- Location: Salisbury Downs
- Been thanked: 19 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
Vote 1. Mrs Tazzer. - Shoot me with your tazzer.
Vote 2. Nick Xenophon. No Pokies - No Fun.
Vote 3. Mike Rann. Poke anything beautiful. Lay on my desk babe. - Normal.
Vote 2. Nick Xenophon. No Pokies - No Fun.
Vote 3. Mike Rann. Poke anything beautiful. Lay on my desk babe. - Normal.
Smile :)
It's only Money $$$ :)
What is happening to our SANFL guys...
It's only Money $$$ :)
What is happening to our SANFL guys...
- Gozu
- Coach
- Posts: 14138
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:35 am
- Team: Norwood
- Been thanked: 686 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
southee wrote:Gozu wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:I said to a mate today - a couple of months ago, who would have thought they would be in a tizz
Exactly which is why I think this whole thing is politically motivated.
You would Gozu!!!! Dont think the majority of the public do though!!!
Interesting to note that she now wants to be released from her 14 day contract with Channel 7, the plot thickens.
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
- Dog_ger
- Coach
- Posts: 6536
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:25 pm
- Team: Central District
- Location: Salisbury Downs
- Been thanked: 19 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
The bikies made a pact to bring Rann down.
The plot thickens.
The plot thickens.
Smile :)
It's only Money $$$ :)
What is happening to our SANFL guys...
It's only Money $$$ :)
What is happening to our SANFL guys...
-
Dogwatcher
- Coach
- Posts: 29318
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
- Team: Central District
- Team: Collingwood
- Team: Elizabeth
- Location: The Bronx
- Has thanked: 1425 times
- Been thanked: 1153 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
Can't see them doing that. Surely...
Will she give the money back, or some of it???
$200,000 for 14 days exclusivity = 14,285.71 per day.
So, if she breaks exclusivity tomorrow (as an example), they've only got $57,142.84 worth....
Will she give the money back, or some of it???
$200,000 for 14 days exclusivity = 14,285.71 per day.
So, if she breaks exclusivity tomorrow (as an example), they've only got $57,142.84 worth....
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
- Dog_ger
- Coach
- Posts: 6536
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:25 pm
- Team: Central District
- Location: Salisbury Downs
- Been thanked: 19 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
Dog_ger wrote:The bikies made a pact to bring Rann down.
The plot thickens.
Still lay on my desk babe, who cares.....
Have you ever been in "who cares territory"?
The man is only human.
Smile :)
It's only Money $$$ :)
What is happening to our SANFL guys...
It's only Money $$$ :)
What is happening to our SANFL guys...
- Psyber
- Coach
- Posts: 12247
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
- Team: Norwood
- Team: Adelaide Crows
- Team: Hahndorf
- Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 405 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
Time to apply Occam's Razor - what is the simplest hypothesis?
1. Her version is entirely true.
2. She is exaggerating for revenge or money.
Anything more complex, involving politics, bikies, or aliens, while it may be possible, is probably less likely...
1. Her version is entirely true.
2. She is exaggerating for revenge or money.
Anything more complex, involving politics, bikies, or aliens, while it may be possible, is probably less likely...
Last edited by Psyber on Tue Nov 24, 2009 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
- Dog_ger
- Coach
- Posts: 6536
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:25 pm
- Team: Central District
- Location: Salisbury Downs
- Been thanked: 19 times
- Contact:
Re: Is it over for Rann?
You missed something Doctor.
This didn't happen yesterday...?
This didn't happen yesterday...?
Smile :)
It's only Money $$$ :)
What is happening to our SANFL guys...
It's only Money $$$ :)
What is happening to our SANFL guys...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests
