by Blue Boy » Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:02 am
by blink » Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:10 am
by stan » Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:47 am
by Rik E Boy » Mon Oct 09, 2006 12:09 pm
by Leaping Lindner » Mon Oct 09, 2006 12:25 pm
by Roylion » Mon Oct 09, 2006 12:45 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:More like 'the guy is a knob when we are losing but a champion when were kicking a55'. The Lions have dropped the ball big time.
by Rik E Boy » Mon Oct 09, 2006 1:42 pm
by Maddogmike » Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:13 pm
by sydney-dog » Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:41 pm
by sydney-dog » Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:25 pm
by TroyGFC » Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:36 pm
by JK » Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:57 pm
sydney-dog wrote:I think the club was more tolerant in the past as it had a more mature list that could manage Aka's personality, now the list is very young I sense the club is worried about his impact on the younger group, but my opinion is, they should of muzzled AKA long time ago.......
In regards to the trade, it's refreshing to see the Aka trade done so early, my opinion, 5 days is too long, it allows clubs to play silly delay tactics for way too long, this is why so many trades are not finalised until the dying hours and in the past it has prevented some smaller trades from being finalised by the 2pm deadline
For Example, Hawks want a first round pick for Spida, so in the Hawks footy dept eyes they value him highly, well if they valued him this highly why didn't they offer him the two years he was seeking
by Blue Boy » Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:38 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:sydney-dog wrote:I think the club was more tolerant in the past as it had a more mature list that could manage Aka's personality, now the list is very young I sense the club is worried about his impact on the younger group, but my opinion is, they should of muzzled AKA long time ago.......
In regards to the trade, it's refreshing to see the Aka trade done so early, my opinion, 5 days is too long, it allows clubs to play silly delay tactics for way too long, this is why so many trades are not finalised until the dying hours and in the past it has prevented some smaller trades from being finalised by the 2pm deadline
For Example, Hawks want a first round pick for Spida, so in the Hawks footy dept eyes they value him highly, well if they valued him this highly why didn't they offer him the two years he was seeking
Im not sure about this (and to be honest haven't had too deep a look into it), but why do we have a one week trade period, when some of the biggest comps/sports in the world (NBL, Soccer) have trade deadlines that cut off during the season proper?
by JK » Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:50 pm
by GWW » Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:05 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:I know, but thanks anyway mate.
In the NBL they are also able to trade immediately AFTER the draft has taken place ...
by Blue Boy » Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:13 pm
GWW wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:I know, but thanks anyway mate.
In the NBL they are also able to trade immediately AFTER the draft has taken place ...
NBL (Thats Aussie competition isnt it) has a draft?
by Rik E Boy » Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:24 am
by Punk Rooster » Fri Oct 13, 2006 2:11 pm
MW wrote:Word is all Brisbane got for Aker was pick 34.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by TroyGFC » Sat Oct 14, 2006 10:50 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |