Should Essendon be allowed to put him on a 'mature-age' rook

Talk on the national game

Post a reply

Should Essendon be allowed to put him on a 'mature-age' rook

Postby sydney-dog » Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:43 pm

I have a lot of respect for Rama but I don't think you can change rules mid-stream

why can the Bombers list him as a long term injury, promote a player from the rookie list, wouldn't this be a cleaner option and stil a win for both the club and player
sydney-dog
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:53 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Top

Postby Mr66 » Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:09 pm

'Tis truly the silly season.
If one person does it, it's insanity. If millions do it, it's religion.

http://www.beyondblue.org.au
User avatar
Mr66
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4392
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:08 pm
Location: Where the Streets Have No Name
Has liked: 12 times
Been liked: 12 times
Top

Re: Should Essendon be allowed to put him on a 'mature-age'

Postby Blue Boy » Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:25 am

sydney-dog wrote:I have a lot of respect for Rama but I don't think you can change rules mid-stream

why can the Bombers list him as a long term injury, promote a player from the rookie list, wouldn't this be a cleaner option and stil a win for both the club and player


I would actually like to see 1 older player being able to be put on a supp/rookie list per club !!!
It is what it is !!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Location: Any where between here and there
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill
Top
Post a reply
Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: beef and 14 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Advertisements by Advertisement Management