Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Talk on the national game

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby Mr Beefy » Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:00 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:The Cats do have something to play for as it is Dasher's 150th game for the club. He doesn't say much ol Dash but the boys love him. As for Bartel, he probably hadn't fully overcome that injury from slamming into the goalpost at the Gabba.

As for Tex Walker. Quite clearly the Cows should never play him again and he should remain with the Redlegs.

regards,

REB

I believe it's Dasher's 250th game and I think it may also be Jimmy's 150th
User avatar
Mr Beefy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5158
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:18 pm
Has liked: 412 times
Been liked: 681 times
Grassroots Team: Rosewater

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby Thiele » Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:50 pm

Otten is ok Petrenko is travelling emergancy
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28406
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 183 times
Been liked: 118 times

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby FD88 » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:28 pm

Thiele wrote:Otten is ok Petrenko is travelling emergancy


Ah, the Ablett tackling specialist. ;)
FD88
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:38 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby Rik E Boy » Sat Aug 01, 2009 11:52 am

Mr Beefy wrote:
Rik E Boy wrote:The Cats do have something to play for as it is Dasher's 150th game for the club. He doesn't say much ol Dash but the boys love him. As for Bartel, he probably hadn't fully overcome that injury from slamming into the goalpost at the Gabba.

As for Tex Walker. Quite clearly the Cows should never play him again and he should remain with the Redlegs.

regards,

REB

I believe it's Dasher's 250th game and I think it may also be Jimmy's 150th


Oops. Course it is. Typo. :oops:

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28588
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby FD88 » Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:54 pm

Really don't see how you could think the Crows should win this REB, given we haven't won at Skilled since 2003. This is a developing Adelaide side, not a built one.
FD88
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:38 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby Interceptor » Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:58 pm

Competitive so far, but making too many mistakes.
There's a lack of awareness from a few players as well.

Poor delivery into the forward line rounds it off.
User avatar
Interceptor
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2989
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:51 pm
Location: London, UK
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 25 times

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby magpie in the 80's » Sat Aug 01, 2009 5:23 pm

cats 14.9.93
crows 13.13.91

Goals
Geelong: Paul Chapman 6, Cameron Mooney 2, Gary Ablett 2, Jimmy Bartel 1, Joel Selwood 1, Steve Johnson 1, Mathew Stokes 1
Adelaide: Kurt Tippett 4, Brett Burton 4, Brent Reilly 1, Michael Doughty 1, Graham Johncock 1, Chris Knights 1, Scott Stevens 1

Geelong....3.3 (21)....7.7 (49)....11.7 (73).....14.9 (93)
Adelaide....3.2 (20)....4.7 (31).....9.11 (65)....13.13 (91)
I went to a fight the other night, and a hockey game broke out. - Rodney Dangerfield (1921 - 2004)
User avatar
magpie in the 80's
Coach
 
 
Posts: 35437
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 7:56 pm
Location: in the quiz books
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby SCD » Sat Aug 01, 2009 5:48 pm

on the way home from skilled. Absolutely shattered, thought the crows were the better team and deserved the win... But crucial skill errors from a few players and umpires at critical times put a stop to that. Beaten, but not disgraced.
Port Power has 16 years history at Football Park...

The Port Magpies have 40 years history and the two shall never be confused or combined
User avatar
SCD
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1743
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: At the Track
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby Rik E Boy » Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:20 pm

FD88 wrote:Really don't see how you could think the Crows should win this REB, given we haven't won at Skilled since 2003. This is a developing Adelaide side, not a built one.


A two point margin says I wasn't too far away and neither were you blokes.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28588
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby Rik E Boy » Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:21 pm

SCD wrote:on the way home from skilled. Absolutely shattered, thought the crows were the better team and deserved the win... But crucial skill errors from a few players and umpires at critical times put a stop to that. Beaten, but not disgraced.


You can't blame the umps. They were crap both ways, I thought the game was overumpired from the start. I thought the Crows were the better side in the second half but the Cats were the better side in the first.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28588
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby Hondo » Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:02 pm

REB was on the money

Close!!! You can never be happy with a loss but to get to within 2 points at Skilled Stadium is a good effort
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby SCD » Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:03 pm

REB - the 25 Geelong - 15 Adel free kick count was just garbage..
I agree and understand there should not be parity in it - but seriously, the amount of frees given to Geelong that resulted in goals yesterday was just infuriating...

The amount of home town decisions that were on show yesterday was a disgrace and I got sick of listening to the commentry from K-ROCK (which included Josh Hunt) saying.. that umpire was the only one who saw that free kick.. It happened all day and even a few geelong supporters around us were saying... gee we were lucky then.... that's a pretty good sign we were bent over by the boys in green...

That being said - the umpires didn't make Porpy drop a chest mark late in the last or have Doughty make 3 or 4 bad skill errors in the last 10 mins.. Nor did they effect our kicking at goal in the 2nd qtr..

We are developing into a good team and given another 12 months of development of some of our kids, we will be a TOP 4 team in the next year or two..
Port Power has 16 years history at Football Park...

The Port Magpies have 40 years history and the two shall never be confused or combined
User avatar
SCD
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1743
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: At the Track
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby RoosterMarty » Sun Aug 02, 2009 2:02 pm

Terrible umpiring, I guess they couldn't let Geelong lose at their home ground. They were an absolute disgrace.

Now we have to smash the Pies.
User avatar
RoosterMarty
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6524
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: Adelaide (near Prospect Oval)
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby whufc » Sun Aug 02, 2009 3:59 pm

SCD wrote:REB - the 25 Geelong - 15 Adel free kick count was just garbage..
I agree and understand there should not be parity in it - but seriously, the amount of frees given to Geelong that resulted in goals yesterday was just infuriating...

The amount of home town decisions that were on show yesterday was a disgrace and I got sick of listening to the commentry from K-ROCK (which included Josh Hunt) saying.. that umpire was the only one who saw that free kick.. It happened all day and even a few geelong supporters around us were saying... gee we were lucky then.... that's a pretty good sign we were bent over by the boys in green...

That being said - the umpires didn't make Porpy drop a chest mark late in the last or have Doughty make 3 or 4 bad skill errors in the last 10 mins.. Nor did they effect our kicking at goal in the 2nd qtr..

We are developing into a good team and given another 12 months of development of some of our kids, we will be a TOP 4 team in the next year or two..


My pet hate just because one team had more free kicks than another does not mean the umpires were biased. Do people not think that sometimes a team deserves more free kicks than the other team. :evil:
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28771
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5963 times
Been liked: 2850 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby SCD » Sun Aug 02, 2009 5:02 pm

It wasn't the count WHUFC...
Just in case you didn't see it the first time.... I clearly said I understand there shouldn't be parity..

It was the non-decisions to the Crows that were given to Geelong..

The play on Porpy wasn't allowed to do in the 2nd qtr when waltzing into the forward 50..
The holding the ball decisions all day when 3 or 4 blokes dive on it and it goes to Geelong..
The "push in the back" against Stevens and Johncock when they used their body to hold ground on a bloke backing back...

We had every 50 / 50 decision go against us and the decisions that Geelong got that resulted directly in goals that was frustrating.. the entire K-ROCK commentary was complaining about the decisions all day...
Port Power has 16 years history at Football Park...

The Port Magpies have 40 years history and the two shall never be confused or combined
User avatar
SCD
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1743
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: At the Track
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby whufc » Sun Aug 02, 2009 5:05 pm

SCD wrote:It wasn't the count WHUFC...
Just in case you didn't see it the first time.... I clearly said I understand there shouldn't be parity..

It was the non-decisions to the Crows that were given to Geelong..

The play on Porpy wasn't allowed to do in the 2nd qtr when waltzing into the forward 50..
The holding the ball decisions all day when 3 or 4 blokes dive on it and it goes to Geelong..
The "push in the back" against Stevens and Johncock when they used their body to hold ground on a bloke backing back...

We had every 50 / 50 decision go against us and the decisions that Geelong got that resulted directly in goals that was frustrating.. the entire K-ROCK commentary was complaining about the decisions all day...


Sorry my mistake missed that line :oops:
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28771
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5963 times
Been liked: 2850 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby tigerland09 » Sun Aug 02, 2009 5:29 pm

So close, a game we really could and should of won.
User avatar
tigerland09
Under 16s
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:17 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 8 times

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby SCD » Sun Aug 02, 2009 5:34 pm

whufc wrote:
SCD wrote:It wasn't the count WHUFC...
Just in case you didn't see it the first time.... I clearly said I understand there shouldn't be parity..

It was the non-decisions to the Crows that were given to Geelong..

The play on Porpy wasn't allowed to do in the 2nd qtr when waltzing into the forward 50..
The holding the ball decisions all day when 3 or 4 blokes dive on it and it goes to Geelong..
The "push in the back" against Stevens and Johncock when they used their body to hold ground on a bloke backing back...

We had every 50 / 50 decision go against us and the decisions that Geelong got that resulted directly in goals that was frustrating.. the entire K-ROCK commentary was complaining about the decisions all day...


Sorry my mistake missed that line :oops:


all good - play on..
Port Power has 16 years history at Football Park...

The Port Magpies have 40 years history and the two shall never be confused or combined
User avatar
SCD
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1743
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: At the Track
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby Rik E Boy » Sun Aug 02, 2009 5:37 pm

SCD wrote:REB - the 25 Geelong - 15 Adel free kick count was just garbage..
I agree and understand there should not be parity in it - but seriously, the amount of frees given to Geelong that resulted in goals yesterday was just infuriating...

The amount of home town decisions that were on show yesterday was a disgrace and I got sick of listening to the commentry from K-ROCK (which included Josh Hunt) saying.. that umpire was the only one who saw that free kick.. It happened all day and even a few geelong supporters around us were saying... gee we were lucky then.... that's a pretty good sign we were bent over by the boys in green...

That being said - the umpires didn't make Porpy drop a chest mark late in the last or have Doughty make 3 or 4 bad skill errors in the last 10 mins.. Nor did they effect our kicking at goal in the 2nd qtr..

We are developing into a good team and given another 12 months of development of some of our kids, we will be a TOP 4 team in the next year or two..


You mean like the goal given to Burton in the first quarter when the ball bounced OVER Coreys Leg. Or the mark taken OUTSIDE of the boundary by Radar?

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28588
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Cats w/no players vs. Crows...can you win it?

Postby Rik E Boy » Sun Aug 02, 2009 5:39 pm

SCD wrote:It wasn't the count WHUFC...
Just in case you didn't see it the first time.... I clearly said I understand there shouldn't be parity..

It was the non-decisions to the Crows that were given to Geelong..

The play on Porpy wasn't allowed to do in the 2nd qtr when waltzing into the forward 50..
The holding the ball decisions all day when 3 or 4 blokes dive on it and it goes to Geelong..
The "push in the back" against Stevens and Johncock when they used their body to hold ground on a bloke backing back...

We had every 50 / 50 decision go against us and the decisions that Geelong got that resulted directly in goals that was frustrating.. the entire K-ROCK commentary was complaining about the decisions all day...


You sound like a Hawthorn supporter. How many times have the Cats been shagged at Football Park. It's got to even out at some stage.

Image

A terrible tale of woe SCD. Just stick to your line that you didn't take your chances.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28588
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |