Poll on Advertiser website

[RustyCage]

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,20471994-21543,00.html

How about an option for "Beaten by a better team?"

Or are they too busy finding excuses and cant consider the fact that there may be a team better than their beloved Crows?

[am Bays]

Spot on PAFC better team won, we had the ability to win if all the players worked together for the full 120 min but ultimately West Coast's class shone through.

I think you'll find the club is doing that, let the crapertiser worry about the external factors....

[Rik E Boy]

LMAO. Nothing has changed in old Adelaide town it appears! What an embarrassment to objective Crows fans everywhere. Mind you, the Geelong Advertiser is hardly a beacon of objective comment when it comes to assessing Geelong's 'performances'.

regards,

REB

[PortAdelaideProud]

REB,

Your right, The Advertiser hasn't changed one single bit. Two straight years, the Crows have lost the pre-lim, and two straight years, the Advertiser reads 'We're so proud of you'.

When Port Adelaide lost two pre-lims finals in a row, the Advertiser read 'CHOKERS' both those years.

Now, if anyone says that The Advertiser isn't biased, they need to be smacked in the head.

[Ian]

Vote Now!
What was the main reason for the Crows' loss to West Coast in the preliminary final?

Add your vote!
*Umpiring decisions

*Biglands injury

*Coaching error

*Players without match fitness

*Unavailable players

Should have been a couple more options, looks like they are the only answers that they want to make public