National Draft winners and losers

Talk on the national game

Re: National Draft winners and losers

Postby brod » Thu Jul 02, 2009 8:24 pm

Squawk wrote:Would be interesting to see a similar spreadsheet of father/son slections - especially given the variations in qualifying criteria over the years and between different states.


From wikepedia.com (so Im not 100% of its accuracy)

The current eligibility of players differs depending upon the home-state of the team making the selection.

Victorian clubs
Each club can select any player whose father played a minimum of 100 senior games for the side. The two interstate clubs with historic links to Victorian Football League teams, namely the Brisbane Lions and the Sydney Swans, can choose the sons of players who have appeared 100 times for either themselves or their predecessors, the Fitzroy Lions and Brisbane Bears or the South Melbourne Football Club respectively.

West Australian and South Australian teams
These four clubs have a modified rule in place, valid until the club has been in the AFL for 20 years, with eligibility to be determined by a certain number of games played for specific sides in state league, specifically:

Until 2007, the West Coast Eagles could select any player whose father had made 150 WAFL appearances for Claremont, East Perth, West Perth or Subiaco.
Until 2010, Adelaide can select any player whose father made 200 SANFL appearances prior to 1990 for South Adelaide, Norwood, Glenelg or Sturt.
Until 2015, Fremantle can select any player whose father has made 150 WAFL appearances for East Fremantle, South Fremantle, Perth or Swan Districts.
Until 2017, Port Adelaide can select any player whose father has made 200 SANFL appearances for the Port Adelaide Magpies, North Adelaide, West Adelaide, Central District, Woodville or West Torrens.

More than one eligible team and player choice
If a player is eligible to be selected by more than one team the individual player may choose which one of these teams is able to pick him under this rule. For example Darcy Daniher's father Anthony Daniher played 118 games with Essendon and 115 with Sydney. Darcy selected Essendon.

Alternatively a player has the right to decline to be selected under the father-son rule and instead be eligible to be drafted by any club. An example of this was Marc Murphy who declined to sign with the Brisbane Lions despite his father - John Murphy - appearing 214 times for the Fitzroy Football Club. Murphy was instead selected as the first pick in the 2005 National Draft by Carlton.

Some exceptional players have been drafted under this rule
Ablett, Cousins, Richardson, Fletcher, J Brown
User avatar
brod
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19193
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: Willaston
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 27 times

Re: National Draft winners and losers

Postby Squawk » Sun Jul 05, 2009 2:35 pm

Why did Port get 6 clubs (counting Woodville and West Torrens as two clubs)?
Steve Bradbury and Michael Milton. Aussie Legends.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRnztSjUB2U
User avatar
Squawk
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4665
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 3:00 pm
Location: Coopers Stadium
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times

Re: National Draft winners and losers

Postby Punk Rooster » Sun Jul 05, 2009 3:18 pm

Adelaide Hawk wrote:All this retrospective talk of drafts drives me nuts. The draft is not an exact science, and had clubs been allowed the benefit of hindsight they may have made different choices.

But let's face it ... who cares? And to label Jack Watts a dud is absolutely ridiculous. It seems every number 1 pick cops this at some early stage of their career but they usually turn out to be very good players.

Anthony Banik (Richmond) 1990...
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: National Draft winners and losers

Postby rogernumber10 » Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:47 pm

Squawk wrote:Why did Port get 6 clubs (counting Woodville and West Torrens as two clubs)?

All the eligible 200-game SANFL players were tallied and to enable an even split between Port Adelaide and Adelaide, the grouping of the clubs fell this way. From memory, Adelaide is able to call on one more player than Port. Also, the intention was to try and divide them in an approximate area, but the key focus was to have an even number of fathers for the two clubs.
Roger Woodcock -- 602 goals from a forward flank makes you a legend.
User avatar
rogernumber10
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:09 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: National Draft winners and losers

Postby JK » Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:01 pm

rogernumber10 wrote:
Squawk wrote:Why did Port get 6 clubs (counting Woodville and West Torrens as two clubs)?

All the eligible 200-game SANFL players were tallied and to enable an even split between Port Adelaide and Adelaide, the grouping of the clubs fell this way. From memory, Adelaide is able to call on one more player than Port. Also, the intention was to try and divide them in an approximate area, but the key focus was to have an even number of fathers for the two clubs.


Weren't the Bays initially aligned to Port but lobbied successfully to fall within the Crows area? (Or am I thinking of something completely different?)
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: National Draft winners and losers

Postby rogernumber10 » Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:05 pm

you are correct
Roger Woodcock -- 602 goals from a forward flank makes you a legend.
User avatar
rogernumber10
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:09 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: National Draft winners and losers

Postby GWW » Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:08 pm

rogernumber10 wrote:
Squawk wrote:Why did Port get 6 clubs (counting Woodville and West Torrens as two clubs)?

All the eligible 200-game SANFL players were tallied and to enable an even split between Port Adelaide and Adelaide, the grouping of the clubs fell this way. From memory, Adelaide is able to call on one more player than Port. Also, the intention was to try and divide them in an approximate area, but the key focus was to have an even number of fathers for the two clubs.


Port should have been given exclusive access to Magpies' sons at the lower amount of games played, exactly the same as the Victorian clubs. The Crows then to have "access" to the remaining SANFL clubs. Its a joke how Brisbane got to take Brown as a father/son (all the old Fitzroy supporters, one in particular tell us Fitzroy still exist in their own right, to me the Brisbane/Fitzroy "merger" was some type of takeover and not really a merger), and yet Port couldn't take Brad Ebert.
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15681
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 817 times
Been liked: 168 times

Re: National Draft winners and losers

Postby Squawk » Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:31 pm

rogernumber10 wrote:
Squawk wrote:Why did Port get 6 clubs (counting Woodville and West Torrens as two clubs)?

All the eligible 200-game SANFL players were tallied and to enable an even split between Port Adelaide and Adelaide, the grouping of the clubs fell this way. From memory, Adelaide is able to call on one more player than Port. Also, the intention was to try and divide them in an approximate area, but the key focus was to have an even number of fathers for the two clubs.


R#10 - why would it be 100 VFL games, 150 WAFL games and 200 SANFL games?
And why would it be that there is a twenty year entry rule as well?
Steve Bradbury and Michael Milton. Aussie Legends.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRnztSjUB2U
User avatar
Squawk
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4665
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 3:00 pm
Location: Coopers Stadium
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times

Re: National Draft winners and losers

Postby GWW » Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:33 pm

Presumably the increased SANFL compared to WAFL games is based on there being more clubs in this state than WA, i'm sure there is a more scientific answer though.
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15681
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 817 times
Been liked: 168 times

Re: National Draft winners and losers

Postby rogernumber10 » Mon Jul 06, 2009 11:59 am

GWW wrote:Presumably the increased SANFL compared to WAFL games is based on there being more clubs in this state than WA, i'm sure there is a more scientific answer though.


This rule had multiple changes through the 1990s until it's become more settled this decade. Last major change was in April 2006 and then the introduction of bidding system a year later. I'll put the full wording of the release below. The 20-year entry rule that previously said fathers had to be in the 20-year window before the new club's entry into the competition no longer applies, and hasn't applied since 2006. Any eligible father from the WAFL or SANFL who has a son late in life, that son can still qualify as a father son pick. So if Russell Ebert had another son right now, Port could take him in 18 years time when he's old enough to be drafted, because Russell played enough games for Port Magpies before the Power came into the competition. If Trevor Sims has a son tomorrow who is good enough to be drafted in 18 years time, Adelaide can take him. However, the player must have played his 200 in the SANFL or his 150 in the WAFL before the AFL club came into existence. Bryce Gibbs didn't qualify for Adelaide as a father-son because Ross had not played 200 games for Glenelg by the end of 1990. He didn't reach 200 until the Crows were some three years old, but Adelaide obviously fought that as hard as they could.
The 150 game and 200 game marks for WAFL and SANFL were set because Fremantle and Eagles were drawing on eight clubs' players between them while Adelaide and Port Adelaide were drawing on ten clubs' between them, and the player pool numbers were calculated in line with what a single VFL club was able to draw on (in terms of eligible 100-game players from that one club). From there, it's the luck of birth as to which former players can produce elite draftable sons.
Geelong has been blessed with Ablett, Scarlett as superstars and Hawkins, Blake, Ablett as guys who fill a role.
St Kilda has had legends in Harvey, Burke, Lockett and Frawley who have had 14 daughters and one son between them.

Now, father son picks in the pool at least have to be bid for by all clubs, and have been done for the last couple of drafts. Cordy went round one that way, and Daniher went round two the year before. In the next few years, Tony Liberatore's son, STeve Wallis' son are coming up, and they are expected to be drafted.

Still, Marc Murphy was eligible to go father-son to Brisbane Lions and he opted not to join the club, and went into the draft. I'm sure Brisbane would love him right now, having got him as a third round pick a few years back, instead of going at pick one to Carlton.

April 06 media release
AFL Chief Executive Officer Andrew Demetriou today announced the AFL Commission had considered the Father / Son rule and its implications going forward for the NAB AFL Draft, at its meeting in Melbourne today.
Mr Demetriou said the Commission adopted a change to the Father / Son rule, which now stated there will be no 20-year qualifying period for the WA and SA-based clubs based on the immediate two decades in WAFL and SANFL football respectively before these teams entered the AFL competition, so as to ensure eligibility rules matched those of the other AFL clubs.
As such, the son of a player who reached the qualifying mark with either the WA or SA-based clubs prior to their entry into the competition would now be eligible to be taken as a father-son selection. (Previously, West Coast was bound by the period 1967-87, Fremantle 1975-95, Adelaide 1970-90 and Port Adelaide (1977-1997).
Mr Demetriou said the Father / Son player qualification limits for West Coast (which draws on Claremont, East Perth, West Perth and Subiaco from the WAFL ) and Fremantle (which draws on South Fremantle, East Fremantle, Perth and Swan Districts) would remain at 150 WAFL premiership games while the qualification limits were higher for the SA-based clubs at 200 premiership games to match the size of the player pools from the greater number of SANFL clubs for Adelaide (drawing on Norwood, Glenelg, Sturt and South Adelaide) and Port Adelaide (drawing on Port Mapgies, Woodville, North Adelaide, Central Districts, West Adelaide and West Torrens).
The Victorian-based clubs will continue to draw on their former player base only with their qualification to remain at 100 games, along with 100 games for the Brisbane Lions and Sydney (drawing on Fitzroy and South Melbourne players respectively).
All 100-game players in the AFL for any club continue to automatically qualify for Father / Son status, with this rule originally introduced to compensate for the period before the WA and SA-based sides entered the competition, with no access to Father / Son selections.
"The previous rule was based on a submission from the Adelaide Football Club in 2001, which had over-estimated the size of the pools available for the non-Victorian clubs to draw on as potential Father / Son selections," Mr Demetriou said.
"The AFL Draft Working group presented a detailed examination of all players who had qualified for father / son status with 100 games for Victorian-based clubs, along with a comparison of the pools available for 150 games in Western Australia and 200 games in South Australia.
"The restriction of a 20-year period for WA and SA reduced the number of players for those clubs to draw on, and also excluded players who had qualified at an earlier time.
"The removal of the 20-year qualification period prior to the entry of the WA and SA based clubs now brings a greater parity to the numbers of players that clubs can reasonably expect to draw a father / son selection.
"As such, the son of a player who reached the 150-game threshold with Swan Districts in 1974 would now be eligible for inclusion on the Fremantle list (even though it is more than 20 years before Fremantle joined the AFL), in the same way that a son of a player who reached 100 games for the Kangaroos in 1974 would be eligible for that club.
"There is no change to the rule whereby a player must have qualified in reaching the player games milestone before the new club entered the competition, meaning that West Coast's qualification period still expires prior to 1987, Adelaide prior to 1991, Fremantle prior to 1995 and Port Adelaide prior to 1997," he said.
In regard to a bidding system, Mr Demetriou said the Commission requested further detail, for the Commission to consider later in the year.
"The AFL Commission requested information on how a bidding system may work for Father / Son selections at the last meeting in March," Mr Demetriou said.
"The initial information that was provided by the AFL Executive was discussed, and the Commission agreed that more discussion should be undertaken in this area by the AFL Executive, to be considered at a meeting later in the year," he said.
Father Son Qualification Summary:
Adelaide - 200 SANFL Premiership games for Norwood, Glenelg, Sturt or South Adelaide up to the end of 1990. 100 AFL Premiership games for Adelaide.
Brisbane Lions - 100 AFL Premiership games for Fitzroy, Brisbane Bears or Brisbane Lions.
Carlton - 100 AFL Premiership games for Carlton.
Collingwood - 100 AFL Premiership games for Collingwood.
Essendon - 100 AFL Premiership games for Essendon.
Fremantle - 150 WAFL Premiership games for South Fremantle, East Fremantle, Perth or Swan Districts up to the end of 1994. 100 AFL Premiership games for Fremantle.
Geelong - 100 AFL Premiership games for Geelong.
Hawthorn - 100 AFL Premiership games for Hawthorn.
Kangaroos - 100 AFL Premiership games for Kangaroos / North Melbourne.
Melbourne - 100 AFL Premiership games for Melbourne.
Port Adelaide - 200 SANFL Premiership games for Port Magpies, Woodville, North Adelaide, Central Districts, West Adelaide or West Torrens up to the end of 1996. 100 AFL Premiership games for Port Adelaide.
Richmond - 100 AFL Premiership games for Richmond.
St Kilda - 100 AFL Premiership games for St Kilda.
Sydney - 100 AFL Premiership games for South Melbourne / Sydney.
West Coast - 150 WAFL Premiership games for Claremont, East Perth, West Perth or Subiaco up to the end of 1986. 100 AFL Premiership games for West Coast.
Western Bulldogs - 100 AFL Premiership games for Western Bulldogs / Footscray.
Roger Woodcock -- 602 goals from a forward flank makes you a legend.
User avatar
rogernumber10
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:09 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: National Draft winners and losers

Postby Booney » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:07 pm

So how did Geelong get Ablett Jnr when Ablett Snr would not have played 100+ AFL games?

Or, in this case does AFL = VFl and why then does the SANFL equivalent = 200 games?
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61701
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8211 times
Been liked: 11942 times

Re: National Draft winners and losers

Postby rogernumber10 » Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:14 pm

Booney wrote:So how did Geelong get Ablett Jnr when Ablett Snr would not have played 100+ AFL games?

Or, in this case does AFL = VFl and why then does the SANFL equivalent = 200 games?


Victorian clubs is 100 games for the club, because they are drawing on 100 games for that one club only. Ablett played 242 for the Cats.
Crows and Power is 200 games in the SANFL because they are drawing on 4 and 6 clubs respectively in that league, not the player pool of one club only.
Freo and Eagles is 150 games because they are drawing on 4 clubs each respectively in the WAFL.

As the Crows, power, freo and eagles go forward in time, they will only be able to get father son picks from their club only with 100 games, just like what currently happens to any original vic-based clubs. As such, to pluck a name each, Rod Jameson is qualified for Adelaide, Michael Wilson for Port, the late Chris Mainwaring for the Eagles and matthew Pavlich for Freo. It's then up to the luck of birth whether Jameson / Wilson / Mainwaring / Pavlich have sons and if they are good enough to be father-son drafted.

Like I said in the earlier post. St Kilda is only drawing on St Kilda 100-game players for its father son picks and four of its greatest players in Frawley, Lockett, Burke and Harvey have had 15 kids between them and just one son.

it's complete fate if you get a great father son, but at least now the player is bid for, and clubs pay a market value.

Stephen Silvagni has three sons and his oldest boy is now 14 and is an absolute jet. I can't imagine the pressure Carlton will face if he's a reasonable player and other clubs are bidding first round picks for him. Not sure how Carlton could let him go, and face their fans.
Roger Woodcock -- 602 goals from a forward flank makes you a legend.
User avatar
rogernumber10
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:09 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: National Draft winners and losers

Postby Roylion » Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:14 pm

GWW wrote:Its a joke how Brisbane got to take Brown as a father/son


How so? They were the conditions laid down by the AFL and voted in favour of by 14 of the 16 clubs. The mooted Melbourne Hawks would have received the same conditions from both Melbourne and Hawthorn, clubs that had been in the VFL-AFL from 1925. The Bears had 10 players eligible to contribute to the father-son rule.

GWW wrote:(all the old Fitzroy supporters, one in particular tell us Fitzroy still exist in their own right,


That they do. They now play in the VAFA. http://www.fitzroyfc.com.au

GWW wrote:to me the Brisbane/Fitzroy "merger" was some type of takeover and not really a merger),


The AFL club operations of Fitzroy and the Bears were merged on November 1st 1996. That isn't the same as Fitzroy Football Club ceasing to exist totally. Certainly Fitzroy Football Club were never liquidated.

How come there are two Port Adelaide sides playing in different competitions?
Fitzroy Football Club 1883-2009
VFA: 1884-1896, 1 premiership
VFL-AFL: 1897-1996, 8 premierships
VAFA: 2009 -->
User avatar
Roylion
Rookie
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:00 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Previous

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |