Psyber wrote:I can't believe anyone is prepared to pay any of them, or any player, more than $100K per annum for taking part in a game while we pay our research scientists so little they all have to go overseas to make a decent living...
How many people watch our research scientists work on tele each weekend????.
I agree that the scientist do a more useful job for society however its all about the value from TV.
I think the real question should which coach is worth more to their respective clubs
My order would then read
1. Rodney Eade
2. Michael Voss - promotional value
3. Neil Craig - crap list and still they win
4.Paul Roos
5.Mark Williams
6. Ross Lyon - has done what many coaches couldn't
7.Alastair Clarkson
8. Michael Malthouse
9. Brett Ratten - why would anyone want to coach the blues
10.Matthew Knights
11. John Worsfold
12.Dean Bailey
13. Mark Thompson - do the cats even need a coach??
14. Mark Harvey - useless
15.Jade Rawlings - wont be there next yr
16.Darren Crocker * " " " " "