by Thiele » Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:54 pm
by hearts on fire » Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:57 pm
by Thiele » Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:41 pm
by Thiele » Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:52 pm
by wycbloods » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:52 pm
Thiele wrote:B: Michael Pettigrew, Toby Thurstans, Jacob Surjan
HB:Nathan Krakouer, Troy Chaplin, Peter Burgoyne
C: Danny Meyer, Dom Cassisi, Tom Logan
HF: Robert Gray, Warren Tredrea, David Rodan
F: Brett Ebert, Brendon Lade, Justin Westhoff
R: Dean Brogan, Kane Cornes, Danyle Pearce
Interchange from: Josh Carr, Jason Davenport, Alipate Carlile, Nick Lower, Matthew Westhoff, Matthew Broadbent, Paul Stewart
IN: Broadbent, Carlile, Davenport, Krakouer, Lower, P Stewart
OUT: Daniel Motlop (ankle), Marlon Motlop, Steven Salopek (omitted)
by dedja » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:58 pm
by auto » Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:25 pm
by auto » Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:29 pm
by GWW » Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:34 pm
by Magpiespower » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:14 am
by Rik E Boy » Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:40 am
by Booney » Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:55 am
by amber_fluid » Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:04 pm
wycbloods wrote:Thiele wrote:B: Michael Pettigrew, Toby Thurstans, Jacob Surjan
HB:Nathan Krakouer, Troy Chaplin, Peter Burgoyne
C: Danny Meyer, Dom Cassisi, Tom Logan
HF: Robert Gray, Warren Tredrea, David Rodan
F: Brett Ebert, Brendon Lade, Justin Westhoff
R: Dean Brogan, Kane Cornes, Danyle Pearce
Interchange from: Josh Carr, Jason Davenport, Alipate Carlile, Nick Lower, Matthew Westhoff, Matthew Broadbent, Paul Stewart
IN: Broadbent, Carlile, Davenport, Krakouer, Lower, P Stewart
OUT: Daniel Motlop (ankle), Marlon Motlop, Steven Salopek (omitted)
So it looks like Salopek is the one who is copping the flak for the poor performances of his team mates.
Peter Burgoyne must be doing something very well to keep his spot, i am sure Salopek would like to know what it is.
by Slots It Through » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:22 pm
by Thiele » Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:32 pm
by JK » Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:31 pm
by Footy Smart » Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:56 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Thought Port took what they had to from the game ... They were competitive for much of the it, and return home with their pride intact.
Obviously would have preferred a win, but in realistic terms I think they'd be quietly happy with yesterdays performance.
by Rik E Boy » Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:09 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Thought Port took what they had to from the game ... They were competitive for much of the it, and return home with their pride intact.
Obviously would have preferred a win, but in realistic terms I think they'd be quietly happy with yesterdays performance.
by JK » Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:39 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:Thought Port took what they had to from the game ... They were competitive for much of the it, and return home with their pride intact.
Obviously would have preferred a win, but in realistic terms I think they'd be quietly happy with yesterdays performance.
LMAO. We were in about second gear nearly all day. At Lemon time Bomber told the boys to take it easy FFS. Geelong were Foxing big time and Port are rank and won't make the eight.
regards,
REB
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |