Tribunal News

Talk on the national game

Post a reply

Tribunal News

Postby sydney-dog » Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:53 pm

Holland - 6 weeks, I don't have an issue

Check, gets off, this I have an issue, no intent for the footy, swans had possession so it was not a shepard, this decision with the Didak verdict two weeks ago is a little confusing, considering Roo got one week
sydney-dog
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:53 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Top

Re: Tribunal News

Postby Blue Boy » Tue Sep 12, 2006 11:58 am

sydney-dog wrote:Holland - 6 weeks, I don't have an issue

Check, gets off, this I have an issue, no intent for the footy, swans had possession so it was not a shepard, this decision with the Didak verdict two weeks ago is a little confusing, considering Roo got one week


Still spewin about the Roo decision. Clement got straight up - Collingwood players are the first to go over ala that Italian bloke in the box @ the World Cup Soccer.
It is what it is !!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Location: Any where between here and there
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill
Top

Re: Tribunal News

Postby Punk Rooster » Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:36 pm

Blue Boy wrote:
sydney-dog wrote:Holland - 6 weeks, I don't have an issue

Check, gets off, this I have an issue, no intent for the footy, swans had possession so it was not a shepard, this decision with the Didak verdict two weeks ago is a little confusing, considering Roo got one week


Still spewin about the Roo decision. Clement got straight up - Collingwood players are the first to go over ala that Italian bloke in the box @ the World Cup Soccer.

Bollocks.
What a stupid comment.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy
Top

Re: Tribunal News

Postby locky801 » Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:40 pm

sydney-dog wrote:Holland - 6 weeks, I don't have an issue

Check, gets off, this I have an issue, no intent for the footy, swans had possession so it was not a shepard, this decision with the Didak verdict two weeks ago is a little confusing, considering Roo got one week


wonder what Holland would have got if the Colliwobbles were still in the finals
User avatar
locky801
Coach
 
Posts: 59068
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:11 pm
Location: working all around Australia and loving it
Has liked: 4484 times
Been liked: 1450 times
Top

Re: Tribunal News

Postby JK » Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:51 pm

locky801 wrote:
sydney-dog wrote:Holland - 6 weeks, I don't have an issue

Check, gets off, this I have an issue, no intent for the footy, swans had possession so it was not a shepard, this decision with the Didak verdict two weeks ago is a little confusing, considering Roo got one week


wonder what Holland would have got if the Colliwobbles were still in the finals


Agreed Locky ... Seems to be much more leniency for those with their season still in tact
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Top

Re: Tribunal News

Postby Blue Boy » Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:04 pm

Punk Rooster wrote:
Blue Boy wrote:
sydney-dog wrote:Holland - 6 weeks, I don't have an issue

Check, gets off, this I have an issue, no intent for the footy, swans had possession so it was not a shepard, this decision with the Didak verdict two weeks ago is a little confusing, considering Roo got one week


Still spewin about the Roo decision. Clement got straight up - Collingwood players are the first to go over ala that Italian bloke in the box @ the World Cup Soccer.

Bollocks.
What a stupid comment.


A bit touchy on that one Punky !!!
It is what it is !!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Location: Any where between here and there
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill
Top

Postby Rik E Boy » Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:32 pm

Touchy, but right.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28580
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1886 times
Top

Re: Tribunal News

Postby Booney » Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:37 pm

Punk Rooster wrote:
Blue Boy wrote:
sydney-dog wrote:Holland - 6 weeks, I don't have an issue

Check, gets off, this I have an issue, no intent for the footy, swans had possession so it was not a shepard, this decision with the Didak verdict two weeks ago is a little confusing, considering Roo got one week


Still spewin about the Roo decision. Clement got straight up - Collingwood players are the first to go over ala that Italian bloke in the box @ the World Cup Soccer.

Bollocks.
What a stupid comment.


I hear you Punky.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61612
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8198 times
Been liked: 11927 times
Top

Postby sydney-dog » Tue Sep 12, 2006 7:29 pm

is it just me, I think the Didak incident was the Holland incident, two totally different verdicts

Chick, I can't understand this one, the player he hit was 10m from the ball and the swans had possession so Chick could not of been sheparding, his sole intent was to take this player out
sydney-dog
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:53 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Top

Postby Dutchy » Tue Sep 12, 2006 7:38 pm

sydney-dog wrote:is it just me, I think the Didak incident was the Holland incident, two totally different verdicts

Chick, I can't understand this one, the player he hit was 10m from the ball and the swans had possession so Chick could not of been sheparding, his sole intent was to take this player out


its just you...
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46221
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2639 times
Been liked: 4303 times
Top

Postby Punk Rooster » Tue Sep 12, 2006 7:53 pm

sydney-dog wrote:is it just me, I think the Didak incident was the Holland incident, two totally different verdicts

Chick, I can't understand this one, the player he hit was 10m from the ball and the swans had possession so Chick could not of been sheparding, his sole intent was to take this player out

Chick got off, did he?
Glad he doesn't play for the Pies, otherwise more conspiracy theories to nauseaum...
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy
Top

Postby sydney-dog » Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:21 pm

Chick not only got off but no case to answer too
sydney-dog
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:53 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Top

Postby sydney-dog » Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:25 pm

confirmed, Holland gets 6 matches
sydney-dog
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:53 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Top

Postby dinglinga » Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:11 pm

be the first time holland belted a bloke.....

did he jump in the grandstand onsunday and knock a female member of the filth cheersquad out
dinglinga
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1508
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 5:09 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Salisbury
Top
Post a reply
Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Advertisements by Advertisement Management