by Magpiespower » Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:49 am
by Jackal » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:20 pm
by goraw » Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:50 pm
by Booney » Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:14 pm
goraw wrote:i went and had a look at this game, and j clayton really impressed me. about the only port player who did. port are very undisciplined . lack run and very indecisive when they got the ball. perkins got a real bath today and the eagles used his wing a lot of the time. if north were the eagles yesterday i wouldnt be too impressed, if they were playing atop 5 side they wouldnt have won. grocke had a chance to kick the eagles clear a few times but he just cant kick goals under pressure, well not yesterday anyway.
brought a steak sanga from the BBQ and the steak was cold, gave that away and got a snag in bread, 3$ :shock:
by goraw » Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:24 pm
by Mickyj » Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:29 pm
goraw wrote:yea i dont mind paying a little extra if it helps keeping our comp viable. it just shocked me at first , but i guess its a sign of the times.
by Mickyj » Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:32 pm
goraw wrote: if north were the eagles yesterday i wouldnt be too impressed, if they were playing atop 5 side they wouldnt have won. grocke had a chance to kick the eagles clear a few times but he just cant kick goals under pressure, well not yesterday anyway.
by LT Smash » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:00 pm
Pseudo wrote:Mickyj wrote:And the price of the magpies BBQ shocking rip off
No blinkin' kidding. Three bucks for a single overcooked snag in a single slice of bread. Would get twice that for the same price at the Bay, and better quality to boot. Seems like the Alberton ground management has gotten used to ripping off the gullible AFL supporters. Little wonder both Port clubs have distinct off-field issues.
by Mickyj » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:05 pm
LT Smash wrote:Pseudo wrote:Mickyj wrote:And the price of the magpies BBQ shocking rip off
No blinkin' kidding. Three bucks for a single overcooked snag in a single slice of bread. Would get twice that for the same price at the Bay, and better quality to boot. Seems like the Alberton ground management has gotten used to ripping off the gullible AFL supporters. Little wonder both Port clubs have distinct off-field issues.
Haha yeah that's why both Port clubs have off-field issues... The snags at Alberton are overpriced!! Now I've heard it all...
by Booney » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:07 pm
Pseudo wrote:Mickyj wrote:And the price of the magpies BBQ shocking rip off
No blinkin' kidding. Three bucks for a single overcooked snag in a single slice of bread. Would get twice that for the same price at the Bay, and better quality to boot. Seems like the Alberton ground management has gotten used to ripping off the gullible AFL supporters. Little wonder both Port clubs have distinct off-field issues.
by Booney » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:11 pm
by Ronnie » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:18 pm
by Pseudo » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:20 pm
Booney wrote:You amaze me at times, not everyone can draw a long enough bow to bring the AFL into a discussion like you.
by Booney » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:26 pm
Pseudo wrote:Booney wrote:You amaze me at times, not everyone can draw a long enough bow to bring the AFL into a discussion like you.
Conversely young Booney, you do not amaze me at all. You can be relied upon to take the bait with monotonous regularity.Kind of disappointed that I only had one other bite though.
by Swamp Donkey » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:31 pm
by Swamp Donkey » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:33 pm
Mickyj wrote:IMHO If Waterhouse was still playing Port may well have run over the top.
by Booney » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:35 pm
Swamp Donkey wrote:It was a game that the Eagles had to win if they were to prove they are a top5 contender this year. Realistically Port Adelaide are very ordinary and poorly coached.
by redandblack » Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:51 pm
Booney wrote:Pseudo wrote:Booney wrote:You amaze me at times, not everyone can draw a long enough bow to bring the AFL into a discussion like you.
Conversely young Booney, you do not amaze me at all. You can be relied upon to take the bait with monotonous regularity.Kind of disappointed that I only had one other bite though.
One of the most ridiculous comments made in forums, " take the bait ", have you noticed that people responding to others comments are the foundation of discussions?
If you wish to discuss issues you may find others responding to them makes it much more interesting, then again you may be happy to just play with yourself...
by JK » Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:00 pm
Booney wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:It was a game that the Eagles had to win if they were to prove they are a top5 contender this year. Realistically Port Adelaide are very ordinary and poorly coached.
It is hard to judge coaching when the cattle just isn't there, but I do feel Tim has had the time to deilver. I dont think he has had the resources though. ( $$$$$ )
I also agree the top 5 will account for Port. Most punters had Port in the bottom 4 and we will fight out 6th spot with West, South and an unlucky North or Eagles outfit.
Centrals, Norwood, Glenelg and Sturt the top 4. So all in all no real surprises that Norwood, North,Glenelg and the Eagles have beaten us. Perhaps Sundays game the only one we 'should' have won.
by Mickyj » Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:13 pm
Swamp Donkey wrote:Mickyj wrote:IMHO If Waterhouse was still playing Port may well have run over the top.
Bad bad comment. There is good reason why Clive retired!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |