by sydney-dog » Mon Sep 04, 2006 6:59 pm
by magpie in the 80's » Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:16 pm
by sydney-dog » Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:31 pm
by heater31 » Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:52 pm
by Maddogmike » Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:55 pm
by sydney-dog » Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:59 pm
by heater31 » Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:08 pm
sydney-dog wrote:Ebert to the crows, the crows need midfielders and I am sure Craigy would not waste him across HF, I have no doubt Craigy would put the work in to him and the intent would be for Ebert to crack a spot in the midfield
honestly, the port faithful would burn the Alberton down if the famous ebert name ended up in the tri-colours
by GWW » Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:10 pm
by Dutchy » Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:46 pm
GWW wrote:The only trade bait they'd realistically have is Meesen, so their trades would probably have to be based around him.
by Magpiespower » Tue Sep 05, 2006 4:31 am
heater31 wrote: I dont think Russell could bring himself to negotiate with Adelaide
by blink » Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:29 am
GWW wrote:The only trade bait they'd realistically have is Meesen, so their trades would probably have to be based around him.
by Dutchy » Tue Sep 05, 2006 12:03 pm
blink wrote:GWW wrote:The only trade bait they'd realistically have is Meesen, so their trades would probably have to be based around him.
I am pretty sure that the Crows annouced they had re-signed Meeson?!?
I think Skipworth & Massie may be put up for trade this year for them.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:17 pm
by Rik E Boy » Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:46 pm
by Blue Boy » Tue Sep 05, 2006 2:00 pm
heater31 wrote:sydney-dog wrote:Ebert to the crows, the crows need midfielders and I am sure Craigy would not waste him across HF, I have no doubt Craigy would put the work in to him and the intent would be for Ebert to crack a spot in the midfield
honestly, the port faithful would burn the Alberton down if the famous ebert name ended up in the tri-colours
If this were to happen there would be a riot that even the cops couldn't control they would have to call in the SAS troops.
Very remote chance that this would go ahead IMHO. Brett's affairs are managed by his father and I dont think Russell could bring himself to negotiate with Adelaide about a contract
by Blue Boy » Tue Sep 05, 2006 2:02 pm
blink wrote:GWW wrote:The only trade bait they'd realistically have is Meesen, so their trades would probably have to be based around him.
I am pretty sure that the Crows annouced they had re-signed Meeson?!?
I think Skipworth & Massie may be put up for trade this year for them.
by Blue Boy » Tue Sep 05, 2006 2:04 pm
Dutchy wrote:blink wrote:GWW wrote:The only trade bait they'd realistically have is Meesen, so their trades would probably have to be based around him.
I am pretty sure that the Crows annouced they had re-signed Meeson?!?
I think Skipworth & Massie may be put up for trade this year for them.
I reckon Skippy will ask for a trade - could walk into many sides and still next year would not be gteed a start at West Lakes despite his form....best move for him would be to look elsewhere
by RustyCage » Tue Sep 05, 2006 2:52 pm
Blue Boy wrote:blink wrote:GWW wrote:The only trade bait they'd realistically have is Meesen, so their trades would probably have to be based around him.
I am pretty sure that the Crows annouced they had re-signed Meeson?!?
I think Skipworth & Massie may be put up for trade this year for them.
Meeson has signed for 1 year.
These days though it doesnt mean much.
by Dutchy » Tue Sep 05, 2006 2:59 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |