Wedgie wrote:hondo71 wrote:Geelong interestingly made only $52K ....
I don't know what's that interesting about it, it was their 9th year in a row of making a nett profit despite funding numerous infrastructure changes/building in that time.
Geelong actually enjoyed an operating profit of $1.216 million but wrote off $1.163m in assets following the demolition of the Drew Stand.
You sound like Rucci and his selective figures over the last couple of days.
If you want a good comparison to the Geelong Footy Club then compare them to other successfully run businesses such as the Crows, Centrals and North Adelaide.
But we digress, this topic is about a failing business that was doomed from the start.
Knew that would get your attention ....
The Crows were similar - $1.6m profit reduced to $88K with a building write off
I am not cracking at the Cats .... just pointing out that they made $1m less than an SANFL club, just like the Crows did

(hey, you started the CDFC comparison and got our mate UK Fan boned up!)
Running an AFL club is a tough, expensive gig. Every club is a top 8 appearance away from a profit or a loss these days. Port have made profits 9 years out of 12, have net assets of $4m, paid their fee to the SANFL every year bar 2 and generate profits for the SANFL (and its clubs) out of AAMI Stadium
Compare that to several clubs in Melbourne

Brisbane lost $2m last year, Collingwood lost $8m (one off abherration I know). One club had it's auditors raise concerns about their ability to continue as a going concern.
Unfortunately Port Power aren't going anywhere soon. If Leigh Whicker is right they'll be debt free in 5 years time and then we'll never get rid of them.
In between signatures .....