Sack Craig

Talk on the national game
Post Reply
User avatar
NFC
Coach
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:43 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Sack Craig

Post by NFC »

What an absolute fool this man is.

He honestly thinks training 'form' is more important than what a player can offer on the ground in a GAME.

Dangerfield now in his bad books. Who next? This guy wil take us nowhere, sack him before it's too late.
FD88
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:08 pm
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by FD88 »

Knee jerk reaction topic. Can't say I'm pleased to see Danger excluded again but there are still more NAB games to be played. We are playing -a lot- of kids in this comp which is what we we've been crying out for - if Danger doesn't get at least one hitout before the H&A season begins then I'll be asking questions, but for now I am hoping that extra bit of conditioning/prep is really all they're looking for, and there isn't something else going on here.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:43 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by NFC »

Armstrong should be playing over Sloane.

Schmidt and Dangerfield should both be in.

He's a joke and only cares about his precious training.
User avatar
Westsider
League - Best 21
Posts: 2310
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:49 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: North Haven
Location: Westsideeeeeeeee
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by Westsider »

Did craig tell him he has to ride another 500km on his pushbike before he can play?
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 11:13 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Hahndorf
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 405 times
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by Psyber »

From the horses mouth - it sounds reasonable to me.
http://afc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabi ... fault.aspx

What concerns me more is that Neil Craig does seem to want the guys to be precise going into the forwards, and that results in hesitancy forward of centre and turnovers while they are looking for a foolproof pass opportunity. I'd prefer stronger contested marking targets up forward, some good crumbers around them, and faster movement into attack.

I don't think we are at "Sack Craig" yet, but I believe he needs to stop thinking only like a mid-fielder and make better use of the big men.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Sorry Dude
League - Top 5
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:36 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 156 times
Been thanked: 73 times
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by Sorry Dude »

this thread should be taken straight off the forum. danger has not had the best pre season with some little niggles so craig has wrapped him up in cotton wool and making sure he is right for round 1. you dont show all your cards in the nab cup and it isnt even for anything now that we have been knocked out. the last thing that you want is a up and coming (possible future leader of the club) player to go out in a trial and get injured and miss the 1st half of the year when it could have been prevented. just my opinion though.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8790 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by Booney »

That's your opinion, just as NFC has his and no one would want your post removed from the forum.

I can NFC's point and I also see yours. My question is this. Do Adelaide think so highly of Dangerfield that they feel he can step right into the fray come Round 1 or 2 ? ( When he is fully fit? )

With the internchange rule in place for the NAB Cup surely even a 1/4 or so for Adelaide is better than anything he will get done over the weekend coming fitness wise.

I did hear Captain Snooze say that Dangerfield dissapointed the entire coaching staff with the way he showed up for pre season training, sounds like the lad did little work on his own in the off season. Perhaps too much smoke getting blown up his posterior and is getting ahead of himself,himself..?
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Sorry Dude
League - Top 5
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:36 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 156 times
Been thanked: 73 times
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by Sorry Dude »

he is playing in the internal for westies this weekend. granted there is a sub rule for the NAB cup. i agree with you in the fact that the hype has been very high on the young kid, have the crows not handled it as well as what they should have? i think brisbane have shown a perfect example of how to handle the media for the new "IT" kids from the draft. and did dangerfield get complaicent thinking that he is on an afl list and take his first off/ pre season a little half arsed?
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47486
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:54 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2937 times
Been thanked: 4844 times
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by Dutchy »

For someone that loves to keep things "in house" Craigs tactics of giving honest reasons why he is not in the team to the media is curious

He doesnt understand the gameplan apparently, just let the kid play in a trial FFS! then make the call
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
Posts: 28710
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:25 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Geelong
Location: The Switch
Has thanked: 1795 times
Been thanked: 1912 times
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by Rik E Boy »

Booney wrote:That's your opinion, just as NFC has his and no one would want your post removed from the forum.

I can NFC's point and I also see yours. My question is this. Do Adelaide think so highly of Dangerfield that they feel he can step right into the fray come Round 1 or 2 ? ( When he is fully fit? )

With the internchange rule in place for the NAB Cup surely even a 1/4 or so for Adelaide is better than anything he will get done over the weekend coming fitness wise.

I did hear Captain Snooze say that Dangerfield dissapointed the entire coaching staff with the way he showed up for pre season training, sounds like the lad did little work on his own in the off season. Perhaps too much smoke getting blown up his posterior and is getting ahead of himself,himself..?


Captain Snooze! Image

regards,

REB
If you are in the Hogg please join the Hogg Shield group - click on link to join https://supercoach.com.au/afl/classic/? ... ode=410870
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:49 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by Hondo »

What NFC and other impatient Crows fans need to accept is that it isn't all about them and that NC and Viney et al are in the best position to judge who should play when.

My take on the Dangerfield situation is that the coaching staff want to make sure there is no attitude like "I'm a talented, over-achieving gun who Mike Turner thinks is the best thing to come out of Geelong since Gary Ablett Jnr. Therefore, I only need to rock up to traing on Thursdays, take a few hangers, not bother with learning the game plan and then play centre on Saturday :shock: "

As Scott Thompson said on 5AA last night, Dangerfield will play before round 1 and will play a lot of games this year. He is a gun, no question. This is short term pain for long term gain.

Don't stress about a pre-season match in Alice Springs.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Sorry Dude
League - Top 5
Posts: 2658
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:36 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 156 times
Been thanked: 73 times
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by Sorry Dude »

hondo71 wrote:What NFC and other impatient Crows fans need to accept is that it isn't all about them and that NC and Viney et al are in the best position to judge who should play when.

My take on the Dangerfield situation is that the coaching staff want to make sure there is no attitude like "I'm a talented, over-achieving gun who Mike Turner thinks is the best thing to come out of Geelong since Gary Ablett Jnr. Therefore, I only need to rock up to traing on Thursdays, take a few hangers, not bother with learning the game plan and then play centre on Saturday "

As Scott Thompson said on 5AA last night, Dangerfield will play before round 1 and will play a lot of games this year. He is a gun, no question. This is short term pain for long term gain.
:-bd

Don't stress about a pre-season match in Alice Springs.
User avatar
JK
Coach
Posts: 37469
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:41 am
Team: Norwood
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Coopers Hill
Has thanked: 4509 times
Been thanked: 3028 times
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by JK »

Rik E Boy wrote:
Booney wrote:That's your opinion, just as NFC has his and no one would want your post removed from the forum.

I can NFC's point and I also see yours. My question is this. Do Adelaide think so highly of Dangerfield that they feel he can step right into the fray come Round 1 or 2 ? ( When he is fully fit? )

With the internchange rule in place for the NAB Cup surely even a 1/4 or so for Adelaide is better than anything he will get done over the weekend coming fitness wise.

I did hear Captain Snooze say that Dangerfield dissapointed the entire coaching staff with the way he showed up for pre season training, sounds like the lad did little work on his own in the off season. Perhaps too much smoke getting blown up his posterior and is getting ahead of himself,himself..?


Captain Snooze! Image

regards,

REB


Captain Snooze has actually been a registered trademark of the Norwood Football Club for the last 3 seasons
FUSC
User avatar
Interceptor
League - Top 5
Posts: 2990
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:21 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Location: London, UK
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 25 times
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by Interceptor »

Psyber wrote:What concerns me more is that Neil Craig does seem to want the guys to be precise going into the forwards, and that results in hesitancy forward of centre and turnovers while they are looking for a foolproof pass opportunity. I'd prefer stronger contested marking targets up forward, some good crumbers around them, and faster movement into attack.

Exactly, this is the real problem, rather than Craig's management of individuals.
FD88
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:08 pm
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by FD88 »

hondo71 wrote:What NFC and other impatient Crows fans need to accept is that it isn't all about them and that NC and Viney et al are in the best position to judge who should play when.

My take on the Dangerfield situation is that the coaching staff want to make sure there is no attitude like "I'm a talented, over-achieving gun who Mike Turner thinks is the best thing to come out of Geelong since Gary Ablett Jnr. Therefore, I only need to rock up to traing on Thursdays, take a few hangers, not bother with learning the game plan and then play centre on Saturday :shock: "

As Scott Thompson said on 5AA last night, Dangerfield will play before round 1 and will play a lot of games this year. He is a gun, no question. This is short term pain for long term gain.

Don't stress about a pre-season match in Alice Springs.


Agreed, couldn't have said it better. You musn't forget that we've got a lot of quality people (case in point Viney) at this club who you'd back to make better decisions than most. My concern has been that there was something other than what was being told to us, happening between Dangerfield and the coaching staff. As long as that's not the case then I'm happy to accept the reasons we're given.

And yes Booney, I'd suggest the club does think that highly of Dangerfield. He's a super talent, already built like a tank and explosively quick. With a couple of games' experience from last year he'd probably go alright. Having said that I would be asking a few questions if he didn't get a NAB game or two before then.
Last edited by FD88 on Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
Posts: 47486
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:54 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Location: Location, Location
Has thanked: 2937 times
Been thanked: 4844 times
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by Dutchy »

and uncontracted at the end of 2009 :-k
GWW
Moderator
Posts: 15681
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 12:20 am
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has thanked: 818 times
Been thanked: 168 times
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by GWW »

Dutchy wrote:and uncontracted at the end of 2009 :-k


is it correct Dangerfield has signed for 3 years? I think i heard that.
FD88
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:08 pm
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by FD88 »

Dutchy wrote:and uncontracted at the end of 2009 :-k


Nope, contracted until the end of 2010. He signed a three year deal as part of his study agreement (obviously so we would still get the regulation two years out of our draftee).
User avatar
Felch
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4123
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 9:17 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Portland
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by Felch »

Dutchy wrote:For someone that loves to keep things "in house" Craigs tactics of giving honest reasons why he is not in the team to the media is curious

He doesnt understand the gameplan apparently, just let the kid play in a trial FFS! then make the call


I think he is keeping things "in house", well the real reason why he isn't playing anyway.

Obviously more to the story than gameplan knowledge and training.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:43 am
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Contact:

Re: Sack Craig

Post by NFC »

Dutchy wrote:For someone that loves to keep things "in house" Craigs tactics of giving honest reasons why he is not in the team to the media is curious

He doesnt understand the gameplan apparently, just let the kid play in a trial FFS! then make the call

I can't believe I'm saying this, but very well said. :?
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 177 guests