by poohbear » Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:14 pm
by damian » Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:28 pm
Micky Conlan wrote:I can only imagine how good the standard of the gsfl would be this year if all those halfwits that voted the pts system in, had any idea what they were actually voting for.I believe we would no doubt have clubs pushing Willunga more so than ever,imagine what sort of a side the creek could come up with without the pts system.
by busta » Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:49 pm
poohbear wrote:wats the deal with compass this year how will they shape up?
by Eric_Gilchurch » Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:30 pm
busta wrote:poohbear wrote:wats the deal with compass this year how will they shape up?
They could be a real dominant force with the inclusion of Scott Mcmahon (former Willunga twosman!)

by a2m » Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:24 am
by Way Down South » Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:41 am
Eric_Gilchurch wrote:busta wrote:poohbear wrote:wats the deal with compass this year how will they shape up?
They could be a real dominant force with the inclusion of Scott Mcmahon (former Willunga twosman!)
Saw him the other day and he was the size of a small house. Not sure if he'll compliment Mount Compass's running game!
by The Yetti » Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:47 am
a2m wrote:In Sydney at the moment, i was speaking to the former Encounter Bay coach who informed me the Loves had signed to play for Campbelltown over here and will be moving to Sydney this weekend. Anyone from Encounter Bay confirm this? cuzzy?
by limb » Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:24 am
by cuzzy » Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:30 am
a2m wrote:In Sydney at the moment, i was speaking to the former Encounter Bay coach who informed me the Loves had signed to play for Campbelltown over here and will be moving to Sydney this weekend. Anyone from Encounter Bay confirm this? cuzzy?
by cuzzy » Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:31 am
The Yetti wrote:a2m wrote:In Sydney at the moment, i was speaking to the former Encounter Bay coach who informed me the Loves had signed to play for Campbelltown over here and will be moving to Sydney this weekend. Anyone from Encounter Bay confirm this? cuzzy?
Is the former Encounter Bay Coach coaching Campbelltown over there?
by The Yetti » Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:36 am
limb wrote:This should answer your question Yetti http://www.sportingpulse.com/club_info. ... &sID=59795
by words of wisdom » Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:53 am
damian wrote:Micky Conlan wrote:I can only imagine how good the standard of the gsfl would be this year if all those halfwits that voted the pts system in, had any idea what they were actually voting for.I believe we would no doubt have clubs pushing Willunga more so than ever,imagine what sort of a side the creek could come up with without the pts system.
But is Creeks (or any team) trying to buy a premiership good for the sustainability of the league? I think Creeks will push Willunga with their new recruits this year, we need to start looking at what the points sytem can do in the long term, i believe it is still in the best interest of all clubs and the league. Some clubs might not see that at the moment but football does go in cycles. Willunga (as an example) may have many retirements in the next few seasons and possibly won't be able to recruit 3 or 4 to cover them in the one off season, while Victor may have many good local players either return or come through the juniors allowing them more and more recruits each off-season.
by damian » Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:22 am
words of wisdom wrote:damian wrote:Micky Conlan wrote:I can only imagine how good the standard of the gsfl would be this year if all those halfwits that voted the pts system in, had any idea what they were actually voting for.I believe we would no doubt have clubs pushing Willunga more so than ever,imagine what sort of a side the creek could come up with without the pts system.
But is Creeks (or any team) trying to buy a premiership good for the sustainability of the league? I think Creeks will push Willunga with their new recruits this year, we need to start looking at what the points sytem can do in the long term, i believe it is still in the best interest of all clubs and the league. Some clubs might not see that at the moment but football does go in cycles. Willunga (as an example) may have many retirements in the next few seasons and possibly won't be able to recruit 3 or 4 to cover them in the one off season, while Victor may have many good local players either return or come through the juniors allowing them more and more recruits each off-season.
So what if you try to buy a flag, good on the creeks. I know they had another gun player who played league footy lined up but could not get him because of the points system. Im not having a go at you Damien, a good debate in fact, if clubs or the league worry about long term some clubs wont be here. How are clubs down the bottom mean't to keep going? Players will get sick of being belted/not having a chance at a flag & move on or not play. Then how do you convince recruits to come to your club? All you will get is players that take/want big $$$ & go after a year or 2. On the current system how can you be competetive if you dont have locals?? I was involved at pongy for a long time and we relied on recruits, payed or not, Guns & fringe, 6-10 players, to get 2 sides on the park & they always will. Im sure they are not the only club in the same boat.
by a2m » Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:27 am
by teamwork » Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:32 am
damian wrote:words of wisdom wrote:damian wrote:Micky Conlan wrote:I can only imagine how good the standard of the gsfl would be this year if all those halfwits that voted the pts system in, had any idea what they were actually voting for.I believe we would no doubt have clubs pushing Willunga more so than ever,imagine what sort of a side the creek could come up with without the pts system.
But is Creeks (or any team) trying to buy a premiership good for the sustainability of the league? I think Creeks will push Willunga with their new recruits this year, we need to start looking at what the points sytem can do in the long term, i believe it is still in the best interest of all clubs and the league. Some clubs might not see that at the moment but football does go in cycles. Willunga (as an example) may have many retirements in the next few seasons and possibly won't be able to recruit 3 or 4 to cover them in the one off season, while Victor may have many good local players either return or come through the juniors allowing them more and more recruits each off-season.
So what if you try to buy a flag, good on the creeks. I know they had another gun player who played league footy lined up but could not get him because of the points system. Im not having a go at you Damien, a good debate in fact, if clubs or the league worry about long term some clubs wont be here. How are clubs down the bottom mean't to keep going? Players will get sick of being belted/not having a chance at a flag & move on or not play. Then how do you convince recruits to come to your club? All you will get is players that take/want big $$$ & go after a year or 2. On the current system how can you be competetive if you dont have locals?? I was involved at pongy for a long time and we relied on recruits, payed or not, Guns & fringe, 6-10 players, to get 2 sides on the park & they always will. Im sure they are not the only club in the same boat.
Good points there WOW..The fact that you must have locals to be competitivei very much agree with, and the points system will enforce that fact. Look at how cloe the Senior Colts have been in recent years, especially '08 - all local players in the colts, they start playing A-grade, each side picks up 4 or 5 recruits to better the standard of competition and all sides should be around the mark and many games would stat coming down to who has had a big pre-season, who is coached better or who plays better on the day. That's how i see the system working.
by words of wisdom » Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:51 am
damian wrote:words of wisdom wrote:damian wrote:Micky Conlan wrote:I can only imagine how good the standard of the gsfl would be this year if all those halfwits that voted the pts system in, had any idea what they were actually voting for.I believe we would no doubt have clubs pushing Willunga more so than ever,imagine what sort of a side the creek could come up with without the pts system.
But is Creeks (or any team) trying to buy a premiership good for the sustainability of the league? I think Creeks will push Willunga with their new recruits this year, we need to start looking at what the points sytem can do in the long term, i believe it is still in the best interest of all clubs and the league. Some clubs might not see that at the moment but football does go in cycles. Willunga (as an example) may have many retirements in the next few seasons and possibly won't be able to recruit 3 or 4 to cover them in the one off season, while Victor may have many good local players either return or come through the juniors allowing them more and more recruits each off-season.
So what if you try to buy a flag, good on the creeks. I know they had another gun player who played league footy lined up but could not get him because of the points system. Im not having a go at you Damien, a good debate in fact, if clubs or the league worry about long term some clubs wont be here. How are clubs down the bottom mean't to keep going? Players will get sick of being belted/not having a chance at a flag & move on or not play. Then how do you convince recruits to come to your club? All you will get is players that take/want big $$$ & go after a year or 2. On the current system how can you be competetive if you dont have locals?? I was involved at pongy for a long time and we relied on recruits, payed or not, Guns & fringe, 6-10 players, to get 2 sides on the park & they always will. Im sure they are not the only club in the same boat.
Good points there WOW..The fact that you must have locals to be competitivei very much agree with, and the points system will enforce that fact. Look at how cloe the Senior Colts have been in recent years, especially '08 - all local players in the colts, they start playing A-grade, each side picks up 4 or 5 recruits to better the standard of competition and all sides should be around the mark and many games would stat coming down to who has had a big pre-season, who is coached better or who plays better on the day. That's how i see the system working.
by BJ Ernest » Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:55 am
words of wisdom wrote:damian wrote:words of wisdom wrote:damian wrote:But is Creeks (or any team) trying to buy a premiership good for the sustainability of the league? I think Creeks will push Willunga with their new recruits this year, we need to start looking at what the points sytem can do in the long term, i believe it is still in the best interest of all clubs and the league. Some clubs might not see that at the moment but football does go in cycles. Willunga (as an example) may have many retirements in the next few seasons and possibly won't be able to recruit 3 or 4 to cover them in the one off season, while Victor may have many good local players either return or come through the juniors allowing them more and more recruits each off-season.
So what if you try to buy a flag, good on the creeks. I know they had another gun player who played league footy lined up but could not get him because of the points system. Im not having a go at you Damien, a good debate in fact, if clubs or the league worry about long term some clubs wont be here. How are clubs down the bottom mean't to keep going? Players will get sick of being belted/not having a chance at a flag & move on or not play. Then how do you convince recruits to come to your club? All you will get is players that take/want big $$$ & go after a year or 2. On the current system how can you be competetive if you dont have locals?? I was involved at pongy for a long time and we relied on recruits, payed or not, Guns & fringe, 6-10 players, to get 2 sides on the park & they always will. Im sure they are not the only club in the same boat.
Good points there WOW..The fact that you must have locals to be competitivei very much agree with, and the points system will enforce that fact. Look at how cloe the Senior Colts have been in recent years, especially '08 - all local players in the colts, they start playing A-grade, each side picks up 4 or 5 recruits to better the standard of competition and all sides should be around the mark and many games would stat coming down to who has had a big pre-season, who is coached better or who plays better on the day. That's how i see the system working.
Senior colts was close last year. How did the clubs go with a small population base? Some sides need more than 4-5 recruits per year as i stated above. Pongy never tried to buy a flag, they recruited to be competetive. The point system should be staggered to alow clubs to be competetive & rebuild quicker.
by damian » Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:56 am
by damian » Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:02 am
words of wisdom wrote:damian wrote:words of wisdom wrote:damian wrote:But is Creeks (or any team) trying to buy a premiership good for the sustainability of the league? I think Creeks will push Willunga with their new recruits this year, we need to start looking at what the points sytem can do in the long term, i believe it is still in the best interest of all clubs and the league. Some clubs might not see that at the moment but football does go in cycles. Willunga (as an example) may have many retirements in the next few seasons and possibly won't be able to recruit 3 or 4 to cover them in the one off season, while Victor may have many good local players either return or come through the juniors allowing them more and more recruits each off-season.
So what if you try to buy a flag, good on the creeks. I know they had another gun player who played league footy lined up but could not get him because of the points system. Im not having a go at you Damien, a good debate in fact, if clubs or the league worry about long term some clubs wont be here. How are clubs down the bottom mean't to keep going? Players will get sick of being belted/not having a chance at a flag & move on or not play. Then how do you convince recruits to come to your club? All you will get is players that take/want big $$$ & go after a year or 2. On the current system how can you be competetive if you dont have locals?? I was involved at pongy for a long time and we relied on recruits, payed or not, Guns & fringe, 6-10 players, to get 2 sides on the park & they always will. Im sure they are not the only club in the same boat.
Good points there WOW..The fact that you must have locals to be competitivei very much agree with, and the points system will enforce that fact. Look at how cloe the Senior Colts have been in recent years, especially '08 - all local players in the colts, they start playing A-grade, each side picks up 4 or 5 recruits to better the standard of competition and all sides should be around the mark and many games would stat coming down to who has had a big pre-season, who is coached better or who plays better on the day. That's how i see the system working.
Senior colts was close last year. How did the clubs go with a small population base? Some sides need more than 4-5 recruits per year as i stated above. Pongy never tried to buy a flag, they recruited to be competetive. The point system should be staggered to alow clubs to be competetive & rebuild quicker. Tell me when pongy or the saints for example look like making the top 3 or 4?? It will take them along time unless other clubs lose alot of players or they can get around the point system some how?
by kappars » Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:32 am
Football
Other Footy Leagues
Country Footy
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

