by The Big Shrek » Sat Feb 14, 2009 12:11 pm
by Dirko » Sat Feb 14, 2009 12:50 pm
by cripple » Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:14 pm
by Dog_ger » Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:49 pm
by Dogwatcher » Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:20 pm
by The Big Shrek » Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:50 pm
Dog_ger wrote:Have an open mind Guys.
She does make sense, think about it...?
Try not to look at it from a SA point of view...?
by GWW » Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:58 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:Dog_ger wrote:Have an open mind Guys.
She does make sense, think about it...?
Try not to look at it from a SA point of view...?
Considering you can punch on in rugby and not get suspended, I find it a bit rich that she describes Setanta's actions as criminal and argues that the AFL are soft for not suspending him for longer.
by Adelaide Hawk » Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:15 pm
by The Big Shrek » Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:16 pm
by jointman » Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:57 am
by Psyber » Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:14 am
She 's right!The Big Shrek wrote:Stupid, stupid woman. Apparantly Setanta should have been sent back to I reland and/or charged with GBH. The AFL are blazer wearing snobs, and the rugby codes are tougher on on and off field violence than the AFL.
Someone please king hit her!
by The Big Shrek » Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:47 am
Psyber wrote:She 's right!The Big Shrek wrote:Stupid, stupid woman. Apparantly Setanta should have been sent back to I reland and/or charged with GBH. The AFL are blazer wearing snobs, and the rugby codes are tougher on on and off field violence than the AFL.
Someone please king hit her!
Decking a player and kicking him when he is down is beyond the pale. It is not just toughness in competition and fair body contact. It is assault.
If you play the game you consent to the body contact that is part of the game, but not to assault outside the rules.
Doing it to a team mate is worse - whatever is between them outright assault between team mates is bad for the team, especially when it shows up in public.
It's like shagging a team mate's wife or girlfriend.
Oh what have I said.. They do that all the time, too, don't they...
Can't expect responsible adult behaviour can we.
by Dogwatcher » Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:48 am
by Psyber » Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:18 pm
Fair point. I hadn't seen her article so I was talking in general principle about the physicality of sport not being an excuse for assault.Dogwatcher wrote:I don't disagree Psyb.
However, her column attacked Setanta and the AFL, and by extension Aussie rules.
If she'd stuck to the real issue, which was Setanta's tantrum, I wouldn't have had an issue on the piece.
However, she took the opportunity to again rail against the AFL and blokes in general - again.
Nobody I know does. It would be seen as evidence of severe immaturity in my circle if it occurred.The Big Shrek wrote: People have dust ups all the time, the legal system wouldn't cope if everyone was charged with assault. Just because technically it was criminal does not mean other people should stick there noses in. AFL should but out and let Carlton deal with it.
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:41 pm
by Dirko » Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:00 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:As much as we can't condone what Sentanta did, it really isn't as isolated as a lot of people like to believe. These people are very competitive, and in a list of 40 plus people, it's impossible to get on with everyone. Footy clubs are like families. Some family members get on well, others don't.
I've seen many cases over the years of team mates getting into each other on the track or over a few beers in the clubrooms. Back in the 1980s, I know of two very high profile team mates who were ordered off the track to settle their differences in the rooms .. and they did so in no uncertain terms.
There have been cases of quick bowlers bowling beamers and bouncers from 18 yards at less favoured team members. I recall one incident at my club where two head strong state players were in each others faces in the nets, and practice had to be stopped.
The Sentanta incident got caught on camera, so it is new to a lot of people who haven't been involved with these guys on the track. Not a big enough deal for Carlton to even consider sacking him.
by Psyber » Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:44 pm
Put in that context I guess it is, perhaps, "normal" behaviour statistically for the people who inhabit that alien [to me] environment.Adelaide Hawk wrote:As much as we can't condone what Sentanta did, it really isn't as isolated as a lot of people like to believe. These people are very competitive, and in a list of 40 plus people, it's impossible to get on with everyone. Footy clubs are like families. Some family members get on well, others don't.
I've seen many cases over the years of team mates getting into each other on the track or over a few beers in the clubrooms. Back in the 1980s, I know of two very high profile team mates who were ordered off the track to settle their differences in the rooms .. and they did so in no uncertain terms.
There have been cases of quick bowlers bowling beamers and bouncers from 18 yards at less favoured team members. I recall one incident at my club where two head strong state players were in each others faces in the nets, and practice had to be stopped.
The Sentanta incident got caught on camera, so it is new to a lot of people who haven't been involved with these guys on the track. Not a big enough deal for Carlton to even consider sacking him.
by Barto » Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:51 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:Someone please king hit her!
by GWW » Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:54 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:I don't disagree Psyb.
However, her column attacked Setanta and the AFL, and by extension Aussie rules.
If she'd stuck to the real issue, which was Setanta's tantrum, I wouldn't have had an issue on the piece.
However, she took the opportunity to again rail against the AFL and blokes in general - again.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |