by mal » Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:01 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Jul 23, 2006 12:02 am
Brad wrote:HOw did everyone know there was 3 seconds left to go????
by Wedgie » Sun Jul 23, 2006 12:04 am
by mal » Sun Jul 23, 2006 12:46 am
Wedgie wrote:Don't talk to me about umpires, if they hadn't given Port 4 or 5 goals in the first quarter as well as some other shockers during the day today we would have won by well over 100pts.
by Wedgie » Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:07 am
mal wrote:Wedgie wrote:Don't talk to me about umpires, if they hadn't given Port 4 or 5 goals in the first quarter as well as some other shockers during the day today we would have won by well over 100pts.
Big deal Wedgie
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:07 am
mal wrote:Wedgie wrote:Don't talk to me about umpires, if they hadn't given Port 4 or 5 goals in the first quarter as well as some other shockers during the day today we would have won by well over 100pts.
Big deal Wedgie
by GWW » Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:13 am
Wedgie wrote:mal wrote:Wedgie wrote:Don't talk to me about umpires, if they hadn't given Port 4 or 5 goals in the first quarter as well as some other shockers during the day today we would have won by well over 100pts.
Big deal Wedgie
Agreed its a big deal mal especially if it cost a side a game or a spot on the ladder.
Noone likes to be seen as whinging about umpires but its a little easier when you win a game by over 10 goals.
I've just watched a replay of the first quarter of the North v Port game today and I can honestly say all 8 of North's goals were from either free running play or marks but I made notes of Ports 7 first quarter goals:
1st goal awful free kick to Poulton
2nd goal awful FAD which resulted in Waterhouse goal
3rd goal legitimate
4th goal awful decision in the middle of the square
5th goal worst decision I've seen of all time when Howard had the ball and a free was given against him for Port goal
6th goal legitimate
7th goal legitimate
People may say why whinge when my team won so comprehensively?
Im worried because come finals time if there's a game decided upon by less than 5 goals it could be the difference.
by twosheds » Sun Jul 23, 2006 7:52 am
mal wrote:With 3 seconds to go the siren blew for an instance
and the game was called full time with the redlegs
hanging on to a narrow lead with the ball in the
forward pocket for Centrals.
After several Centrals players remonstrated after a
few minutes the game was restarted to continue for
the final 3 seconds.
The result did not change.
Common sense prevailed as the game was allowed
to finish to completion.
On a lighter note a Centrals supporter standing next to
me abused the umpires and the Norwood football club
for the mishap....He continued on for at least 2 minutes
with his incessive tirade.....I reminded the IDIOT of the
recent occurence at Elizabeth Oval when CD played ST
and that game was finished several minutes before time,
and the reason .. a train went past and blew its horn.....
The IDIOT was rendered into embarrasment, but laughed!
The SANFL alive and well.
ps: Go yoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooou legs
by raymond » Sun Jul 23, 2006 9:29 am
by mal » Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:20 am
by mal » Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:22 am
Adelaide Hawk wrote:mal wrote:Wedgie wrote:Don't talk to me about umpires, if they hadn't given Port 4 or 5 goals in the first quarter as well as some other shockers during the day today we would have won by well over 100pts.
Big deal Wedgie
Strange ... your thread was about Norwood, Central District, and the time keepers. Suddenly it's about umpires and North Adelaide
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:24 am
It was a touching moment to see James and Chris Gowans take the time
to run through all the kids
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:26 am
mal wrote:As the players ran out through the parade race to commence
the third quarter, the mini league kids lined up awaiting thier heroes
to come out.
It was a touching moment to see James and Chris Gowans take the time
to run through and high 5 all the kids.
The twins slapped nearly every kid on the way through and something those
kids will remember for life.
The twins often get adverse publicity but I take my hat off to both of them.
Well done lads.
ps:The twins slapped the Norwood mini league team !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
by mal » Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:34 am
by dinglinga » Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:41 am
by Baby Jav » Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:29 am
by Booney » Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:45 am
mal wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:mal wrote:Wedgie wrote:Don't talk to me about umpires, if they hadn't given Port 4 or 5 goals in the first quarter as well as some other shockers during the day today we would have won by well over 100pts.
Big deal Wedgie
Strange ... your thread was about Norwood, Central District, and the time keepers. Suddenly it's about umpires and North Adelaide
Thats why i posted big deal.
by topsywaldron » Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:55 am
Baby Jav wrote:I think we hate the Gowans boys because we would all like them in our team! I have personally met the boys and had an opportnity to get to know them, and they are two of the nicest blokes I have met. They are tough footballers and fierce opponents on field - but genuinely nice guys off it.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |