by Sir Red of Norwood » Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:50 am
by Adelaide Hawk » Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:30 am
by FlyingHigh » Tue Oct 14, 2008 8:17 am
by TigerBoss » Tue Oct 14, 2008 8:33 am
Wedgie wrote:In all seriousness even though Im a Geelong supporter I think South should work on looking a bit more unique and I think they should go with the 1st and 3rd guernseys, the predominately navy blue at home and the predominately white one away from home.
Full marks for the designs.
by Ingall » Tue Oct 14, 2008 8:38 am
by MightyEagles » Tue Oct 14, 2008 9:19 am
by darley16 » Tue Oct 14, 2008 9:49 am
by TigerBoss » Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:13 am
darley16 wrote:Pathetic, uneccessary, amatuer league design, disrepectful to a club of 132 years history. The jumper is brand recognition and must reflect the tradition of a club of such an age. Our current jumper has been a survivor for decades reflected in the photo's of the 1938 & 1964 premiership teams, it is historic and traditional, a simple unclutered Australian Rules gurnsey that is regarded by many outside the club as an excellent design.
The SANFL is built on and survives on tradition, recognition of its clubs and their history. Tell a Port Magpie supporter about changing their jumper and see the response. WAFL in the early 1990's changed all the clubs designs in order to combat the AFL, and in doing so lost its heritage and eventual support.
SAFC change our jumper at its peril, we have far more to lose than any minor short-term gain
by HeartBeatsTrue » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:35 am
by Punk Rooster » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:43 am
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:When was the last time a team (before WWTFC) last changed a home guernsey? Was it Centrals?
All 8 clubs (WWTFC excepted) need to keep their traditional guernseys.
I'm all for away/clash jumpers, which IMO should just be the reverse of the home guernsey for 2 colour teams. Centrals away one is perfect.
Glenelg: All gold with black sash
Central: What they have
North: Dont need one
Norwood: All red with blue trim
Port: Dont need one
Sturt: Dont need one
South: White with blue SA
West: Red with black sash
WWT: What they have now is the best they've had
Another idea for a South clash is to keep their current guernsey, and add white panelling on the sides.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Pseudo » Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:50 am
HeartBeatsTrue wrote:All 8 clubs (WWTFC excepted) need to keep their traditional guernseys.
I'm all for away/clash jumpers, which IMO should just be the reverse of the home guernsey for 2 colour teams. Centrals away one is perfect.
Glenelg: All gold with black sash
by holden78 » Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:15 pm
Sojourner wrote:Absolutley cannot stand the idea of the club changing the guernsey unless its to make the slight alteration back to make it the very same as it was in the 1970's without the S looping around the A.
Naturally I will be voting no to the idea!![]()
If South wish to have an alternative guernsey then go use our Heritage Guernsey is my suggestion. In the 30+ years that I have supported the club we have achived little in the way of a positive result, the one thing though that South does have that no other club has is that we as a club are the oldest club in the SANFL. South are the last of the clubs that founded the SAFA and we as a club should be entitled to emphasise that history as a part of who we are. To openly reject the history of the club in order to suggest that to do so will release the club from its losing streak is ridiculous and insulting at the least.
Its great that Geelong are a successfull AFL club, yet we are our own club with our own history and the thought of being "Patched Over" by a another club makes me feel sick.
Hopefully the members stick together and not only vote out the idea but at the same time vote out the current board of the club who appear to me to be a lot more of a problem than the currrent guernsey of the club......
by Stevie_K » Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:30 pm
Pseudo wrote:Nevertheless if Glenelg ever did adopt a gold alternative jumper (God forbid - take note GFC), it would be the black V 1934 premiership jumper before gold with black sash.
by Pseudo » Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:40 pm
Well, beauty in the eye of the beholder and all that, but I reckon the current positioning of sponsorship on the guernsey is the best since the Associated Midland design of the early '80s. Previous sponsorship patches have stood out like sore thumbs; the current Gliderol logo blends in with the jumper a lot better. From a distance it is hardly noticeable.holden78 wrote:.... Also on the subject of sponsors names , the League should rule on a limit on the size ; Glenelgs this year was obnoxious and ruined its aesthetics
by HeartBeatsTrue » Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:57 pm
Pseudo wrote:From a distance it is hardly noticeable.
by Barto » Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:57 pm
zipzap wrote:I like the second one only. The other's are dire.
Go the sock-puppet seals!
by eaglehaslanded » Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:22 pm
by Barto » Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:24 pm
eaglehaslanded wrote:All look good but I personaly prefer no.2
by TigerBoss » Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:28 pm
Barto wrote:eaglehaslanded wrote:All look good but I personaly prefer no.2
They're all 'number two' to be honest.
by evaneagle » Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:37 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |