2008 League GF review

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby Big Phil » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:53 am

Adelaide Hawk wrote:
demonseye wrote:Just on Grima. I was told yesterday that before he signed with Glenelg he spent a day with the Centrals boys at Luke Cowans place for a bbq and drinks and he drank all the piss put on, got smashed and left with everyone believing he was going to be a Bulldog. A week or so later signs with the bays! Says alot about a bloke i reckon and some of the boys havent let him forget it either. Good decision Grima you dumass.


Don't get too high and mighty, it happens all the time. Central have been known to pick up a few after they'd "promised" themselves to other clubs.



Such as AH ???
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
 
Posts: 20299
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 284 times

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby sjt » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:58 am

I think so Constance. I might be wrong but I think he kicked three in the last quarter.
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby sturtpeter » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:59 am

We should have won 4 in the 70's

1970 tick, 1974 tick, 1976 tick 1978 :( :(
Avid Sturt supporter and SANFL fanatic.
User avatar
sturtpeter
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1680
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 9:11 am
Location: Parkside SA
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 4 times
Grassroots Team: Glenunga

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby TigerBoss » Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:06 pm

Congratulations to the Dogs...thoroughly deserved the win. I'm not entirely willing to say the Dogs are the better side, but they put it all together when it counted most. That's why they are such a successful club, and do the job when the job needs to be done.

Great year by the Bays, but finishing 2nd is simply not good enough. I'd be expecting the club to go all the way next year, or we'll go down as a club that has wasted its opportunities yet again. Losing Grand Finals is NOT the culture we want continued.

Fair to say the club needs a stiff kick up the @ss for not recognising the Under 19s premiership victory in front of all the fans back at the club on Sunday Night. Those poor lads went home without the hero worship they deserved, having come from behind to snatch victory over a gallant Sturt side.

Not a good day, and I'm still feeling quite shattered about the whole thing today. I think this loss will stay with me for a long, long time.

To the Dogs, well done. See you in the finals next year...

To my fellow Snouts, see you at the Bays B&F this Friday Night.
Is 2009 the year of the Tiger?
User avatar
TigerBoss
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:59 am
Location: Snout's Bar!
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Lock

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby Dutchy » Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:34 pm

From the members newsletter -

Congratulations to Central for being too good on the day.
Sunday's Grand Final was an opportunity lost for the Glenelg Football Club.
There is absolutely no sense of near enough is good enough or it was a good
effort to get there. Yes, progress has been made and the players have worked
extremely hard but we were not there on Sunday to make up the numbers. We
were there to win. There is only a sense of disappointment and a commitment
to get better as a football club. The hard work to improve begins now...
Thank you to our magnificent supporters for your enthusiasm and commitment.

Mark Mickan
Senior Coach
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46273
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2650 times
Been liked: 4323 times

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby SnappyTom » Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:43 pm

Dutchy wrote:From the members newsletter -

Congratulations to Central for being too good on the day.
Sunday's Grand Final was an opportunity lost for the Glenelg Football Club.
There is absolutely no sense of near enough is good enough or it was a good
effort to get there. Yes, progress has been made and the players have worked
extremely hard but we were not there on Sunday to make up the numbers. We
were there to win. There is only a sense of disappointment and a commitment
to get better as a football club. The hard work to improve begins now...
Thank you to our magnificent supporters for your enthusiasm and commitment.

Mark Mickan
Senior Coach


Here, here. I think the supporter numbers were (albeit expected after such a long absence) terrific, quite a populous of black and yellow on the day. And it is a building exercise.

ST...
The cats of Australia have made their choice!!!
User avatar
SnappyTom
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 634
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:08 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby holden78 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:57 pm

Ofcoarse their the better side , 7 goals aint real close on the day ; & they beat you the last 3 times !
TigerBoss wrote:Congratulations to the Dogs...thoroughly deserved the win. I'm not entirely willing to say the Dogs are the better side, but they put it all together when it counted most. That's why they are such a successful club, and do the job when the job needs to be done.

Great year by the Bays, but finishing 2nd is simply not good enough. I'd be expecting the club to go all the way next year, or we'll go down as a club that has wasted its opportunities yet again. Losing Grand Finals is NOT the culture we want continued.

Fair to say the club needs a stiff kick up the @ss for not recognising the Under 19s premiership victory in front of all the fans back at the club on Sunday Night. Those poor lads went home without the hero worship they deserved, having come from behind to snatch victory over a gallant Sturt side.

Not a good day, and I'm still feeling quite shattered about the whole thing today. I think this loss will stay with me for a long, long time.

To the Dogs, well done. See you in the finals next year...

To my fellow Snouts, see you at the Bays B&F this Friday Night.
holden78
League - Best 21
 
Posts: 1945
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 10:43 am
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 55 times

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby JK » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:19 pm

sjt wrote:I think so Constance. I might be wrong but I think he kicked three in the last quarter.


Cheers mate, definitely goes alright from what Ive seen.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby JK » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:20 pm

sturtpeter wrote:We should have won 4 in the 70's

1970 tick, 1974 tick, 1976 tick 1978 :( :(


Hardly Centrals-esque :wink:
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby leftlegger » Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:38 pm

Centrals far too good!

topsywaldron wrote:Glenelg lost the game when one of their guys had the chance to put a Centrals player into the grandstand and didn't. The CDFC player, maybe Dutschke?, was backing back with the flight of the ball and the oncoming Bays player, possibly Hinge?, squibbed it at the last minute. One minute later Callinan kicks a ripper and the Dogs roll on.


Absolutely.
Our blokes needed to be much aggressive at the body and ball.
FFS! YOU PLAY FOR KEEPS IN A GF!

Still Proud of the TIGES!
But VERY dissappointed.
Yeah, Naah,..... Bollocks!
User avatar
leftlegger
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 680
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 11:20 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: PHOS Camden

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby am Bays » Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:51 pm

leftlegger wrote:Centrals far too good!

topsywaldron wrote:Glenelg lost the game when one of their guys had the chance to put a Centrals player into the grandstand and didn't. The CDFC player, maybe Dutschke?, was backing back with the flight of the ball and the oncoming Bays player, possibly Hinge?, squibbed it at the last minute. One minute later Callinan kicks a ripper and the Dogs roll on.


Absolutely.
Our blokes needed to be much aggressive at the body and ball.
FFS! YOU PLAY FOR KEEPS IN A GF!

Still Proud of the TIGES!
But VERY dissappointed.


Agreed go back to Rd 11 when Fisher was camped under a ball in front of the grandstand at Elizabeth, as soon as he took the mark a Centrals player went straight through him (no problems its part of footy and a free kick was rewarded (all that it deserved)).

Difference between the two clubs Centrals are ruthless when presented with an opportunity to hurt a player they did it, when we had the chance to exact revenge - we jumped around the player and tried to just spoil the mark which even then we failed to do....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19775
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 2130 times

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby jockey » Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:44 pm

NFC wrote:
Mic wrote:
kookas wrote:we done to the dogs, they played a very good game of football. Can the Glenelg directors please organise for a tow truck to come back to AAMI to pick up the buses which were left there from the glenelg supporters who jumped off at three quarter time.


It was amazing stuff, on TV it seemed like there were about 10 thousand less people in the stands at the start of the 4th quarter? Obviously many Crows supporters are Bays supporters.

Or maybe neutrals couldn't be stuffed sitting around Dogs supporters and hearing stupid chants and seeing flares.


NFC..

get a life, arn't you sick of bagging the dogs and their supporters yet..

You have some tossers at the parade too you know...


talking about tossers, My wife and I took our two youngest children, and had a great time, we were surrounded by some very friendly bay supporters who were copping some grief from a teenage bulldog fan...my wife tried to tell me to keep quiet when I told him to shut up and watch the game...he spent at least half the game facing the crowd and bagging the bay supporters.

There was one bay supporter who was a bit lippy, kept bagging those "Mcgowan twins :lol:" but he was a tad quieter when I asked him if this was the first game he had been too this year :) and he left about 2 minutes into the last quarter..
jockey
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 6:55 am
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Salisbury West

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby Apachebulldog » Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:16 pm

NFC not stupid chants at all winning chants they are , you should of said stupid flares right !!

Dutchy tell me how CDFC officials stop people entering footy park with flares how do you know who is carrying flares can you detect them by the color of their eyes ,maybe the color of their hair, maybe the red ,white and blue scarves they wear ???? i thought it is up to security at the venue to enforce it, and not officials from SANFL clubs, maybe it is time they installed scanners to catch these imbeciles.

If the Apache catches any moron with a flare he will be made to do the sun dance, which is having meat hooks inserted into their body and then suspended for quite some time, but the Apache will add a slight twist to it by lighting a flare under their clacker.

So if any of you cretins read this watch out the Apache is on the warpath.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.

Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
User avatar
Apachebulldog
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
Location: On the prairie
Has liked: 381 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby redden whites » Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:21 pm

TigerBoss wrote:Congratulations to the Dogs...thoroughly deserved the win. I'm not entirely willing to say the Dogs are the better side

EXCUSE ME.........did I read that right?????

You had your ars*s absolutley handed back to you on the finest china platter twice in 3 weeks.You must be kidding pal :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: .I thought the class gap between the sides was very very evident and results I suggest back me up!!! I have heard it all .You didnt lose in the dying minutes you were belted both times ......Give me a break!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
redden whites
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1970
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:09 am
Location: On the way to Bonnie Doon
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 8 times
Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby Dirko » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:03 pm

Nice selective editing there....Why not quote TB's full post. I too thought Glenelg were the best side all year, they just fell on the big stage & well done to the Dogs for that.

Even Central people admit the Dogs weren't the best side all year, they just put it together when it mattered the most.....
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby Dutchy » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:07 pm

Apachebulldog wrote:Dutchy tell me how CDFC officials stop people entering footy park with flares how do you know who is carrying flares can you detect them by the color of their eyes ,maybe the color of their hair, maybe the red ,white and blue scarves they wear ???? i thought it is up to security at the venue to enforce it, and not officials from SANFL clubs, maybe it is time they installed scanners to catch these imbeciles.



They cant stop them taking them into venues however if they really wanted to find out who was doing it they could, intelligence from members would be easy to obtain, its not a large group that sets them off....

what I will say is I have never ever had one problem/issue with ANY central fans, Ive heard of some ordinary incidents but havent seen any first hand, cant say that for other clubs...
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46273
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2650 times
Been liked: 4323 times

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby Zathrus » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:13 pm

SJABC wrote:Nice selective editing there....Why not quote TB's full post. I too thought Glenelg were the best side all year, they just fell on the big stage & well done to the Dogs for that.

Even Central people admit the Dogs weren't the best side all year, they just put it together when it mattered the most.....


correct, thats why there were only two dogs in the 'tiser team of the year
User avatar
Zathrus
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:47 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby redden whites » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:16 pm

SJABC wrote:Nice selective editing there....Why not quote TB's full post. I too thought Glenelg were the best side all year, they just fell on the big stage & well done to the Dogs for that.

Even Central people admit the Dogs weren't the best side all year, they just put it together when it mattered the most.....

It is up a few times for all to see ..The bays fell on the big stage twice .If you lot are happy to hang ya hats on that then good luck to you .Beaten twice in the finals would remove any thought of me claiming my side could claim to be the best side for the year if it was North but each to their own.I still find it a remarkable claim to even be thinking about.
User avatar
redden whites
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1970
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:09 am
Location: On the way to Bonnie Doon
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 8 times
Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby Dutchy » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:21 pm

might have been the best side for the season but it means jack sh1t!!!
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46273
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2650 times
Been liked: 4323 times

Re: 2008 League GF review

Postby Dirko » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:25 pm

redden whites wrote:It is up a few times for all to see ..The bays fell on the big stage twice .If you lot are happy to hang ya hats on that then good luck to you .Beaten twice in the finals would remove any thought of me claiming my side could claim to be the best side for the year if it was North but each to their own.I still find it a remarkable claim to even be thinking about.


Can't find any posts about Glenelg people being happy, so don't know where you pulled that one from.
I was reflecting more on the season as a whole then just the finals, but hey that's the digs. Take it any way you want as you can usually twist it to read the way you choose.....
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |