Qualifying Final Central v Sturt Review Thread

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Qualifying Final Central v Sturt Review Thread

Postby locky801 » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:01 pm

cennals05 wrote:
MightyEagles wrote:Does any one know the crowd figures?


On RPH they said the crowd was 15000 something.



over 17000
Life is about moments, Create them
User avatar
locky801
Coach
 
Posts: 59110
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:11 pm
Location: working all around Australia and loving it
Has liked: 4496 times
Been liked: 1451 times

Re: Qualifying Final Central v Sturt Review Thread

Postby Punk Rooster » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:07 pm

Wedgie wrote:
MightyEagles wrote:Does any one know the crowd figures?

I think it high teens, would have been 25k if they'd had it yesterday.

nonsense.
Amateur/Country GF's everywhere...
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: Qualifying Final Central v Sturt Review Thread

Postby spell_check » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:08 pm

15,825 I heard the crowd was. Last year it was 11,476, but it turned out to be a worse day weather wise last year. This is how it sits with the other crowds since 1991:

1991: 31,455 W.A/P.A; N.A/Eag
1996: 31,245 Eag/W.A; P.A/Nor
1995: 25,895 N.A/W.A; P.A/Nor
1994: 21,226 Nor/Gl; P.A/C.D
1993: 18,529 Nor/C.D; P.A/Gl
1992: 17,154 Gl/S.A; Eag/N.A
2008: 15,825 Nor/P.A; C.D/St
2000: 15,539 St/Nor; C.D/P.A
1997: 15,109 N.A/St; P.A/C.D
1999: 14,590 Nor/St; Eag/Gl
1998: 12,065 P.A/C.D; W.A/Nor
2006: 11,902 S.A/P.A; C.D/N.A
2004: 11,842 N.A/W.A; Eag/St
2007: 11,476 Gl/St; N.A/Eag
2001: 10,898 Nor/W.A; Eag/P.A
2002: 10,765 Eag/W.A; St/Nor
2005: 9,434 N.A/St; P.A/Eag

Edit: 15,825; not 15,835.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18824
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 227 times

temp

Postby mal » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:16 pm

At least no one has mentioned this
The crowd running onto the ground for CHAMBERS 100 goals cost ST the game
They did when GEHRIG kicked his 100 goals + SK lost to PP in a prelim final

Its purely coincidental what happens after the crowds run onto the ground
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 30243
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2112 times
Been liked: 2149 times

Re: 1st Semi 2008 Sturt v Norwood

Postby Dirko » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:19 pm

mal wrote:Its purely coincidental what happens after the crowds run onto the ground


Bloody didn't stop Hawthorn a couple of weeks ago MAL.....
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Qualifying Final Central v Sturt Review Thread

Postby Dogwatcher » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:22 pm

Doggies!!!!!!
Pulsating last quarter.

Well done to you Cennals for listening to it over there!
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Qualifying Final Central v Sturt Review Thread

Postby Aerie » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:24 pm

Centrals just seemed to keep Sturt within reaching distance most of the day and ended up playing to win in the final quarter while Sturt were playing to save the game. Crane should have kicked that goal at the end to win the game. Could be some nervous Sturt supporters next week... Well done Central - tough, gutsy win, as we've come to expect.
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5750
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 186 times
Been liked: 590 times

Re: 1st Semi 2008 Sturt v Norwood

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:24 pm

mal wrote:At least no one has mentioned this
The crowd running onto the ground for CHAMBERS 100 goals cost ST the game
They did when GEHRIG kicked his 100 goals + SK lost to PP in a prelim final

Its purely coincidental what happens after the crowds run onto the ground


All I want to know is why a crowd can discipline itself to stay off the ground after their team wins a Grand Final, and yet they can't resist storming onto the ground like houligans just because someone kicks their 100th goal. It's crap, it's self-induldulgent, it's unnecessary, it's stupid, and a complete waste of everyone's time.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Qualifying Final Central v Sturt Review Thread

Postby Wedgie » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:26 pm

Punk Rooster wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
MightyEagles wrote:Does any one know the crowd figures?

I think it high teens, would have been 25k if they'd had it yesterday.

nonsense.
Amateur/Country GF's everywhere...


ie less Amateur/Country teams playing than normal.
There was finals today too.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Qualifying Final Central v Sturt Review Thread

Postby Punk Rooster » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:27 pm

you'll find that the 8 other sides in each division would show some interest in their GF, as would family & friends.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: 1st Semi 2008 Sturt v Norwood

Postby mal » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:28 pm

SJABC wrote:
mal wrote:Its purely coincidental what happens after the crowds run onto the ground


Bloody didn't stop Hawthorn a couple of weeks ago MAL.....


Yeah but people still rave on about GEHRIGS 100 costing SK the final
The real reason SK lost is becoz they didnt score 1 more goal for the game
mal
Coach
 
Posts: 30243
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:45 pm
Has liked: 2112 times
Been liked: 2149 times

Re: 1st Semi 2008 Sturt v Norwood

Postby locky801 » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:31 pm

Adelaide Hawk wrote:
mal wrote:At least no one has mentioned this
The crowd running onto the ground for CHAMBERS 100 goals cost ST the game
They did when GEHRIG kicked his 100 goals + SK lost to PP in a prelim final

Its purely coincidental what happens after the crowds run onto the ground


All I want to know is why a crowd can discipline itself to stay off the ground after their team wins a Grand Final, and yet they can't resist storming onto the ground like houligans just because someone kicks their 100th goal. It's crap, it's self-induldulgent, it's unnecessary, it's stupid, and a complete waste of everyone's time.


That isd probably one of the best questions ever asked and spot on too, never thought of that
Life is about moments, Create them
User avatar
locky801
Coach
 
Posts: 59110
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:11 pm
Location: working all around Australia and loving it
Has liked: 4496 times
Been liked: 1451 times

Re: 1st Semi 2008 Sturt v Norwood

Postby bayman » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:37 pm

Adelaide Hawk wrote:
mal wrote:At least no one has mentioned this
The crowd running onto the ground for CHAMBERS 100 goals cost ST the game
They did when GEHRIG kicked his 100 goals + SK lost to PP in a prelim final

Its purely coincidental what happens after the crowds run onto the ground


All I want to know is why a crowd can discipline itself to stay off the ground after their team wins a Grand Final, and yet they can't resist storming onto the ground like houligans just because someone kicks their 100th goal. It's crap, it's self-induldulgent, it's unnecessary, it's stupid, and a complete waste of everyone's time.



tradition
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: Qualifying Final Central v Sturt Review Thread

Postby Tassie Blues » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:43 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:Go the Blues.

Image

regards,

REB


Thats what you call hitting the nail on the head! Not good enough today blues and it will be a long way back from here!
Tassie Blues
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1076
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:29 pm
Has liked: 33 times
Been liked: 13 times
Grassroots Team: Ingle Farm

Re: 1st Semi 2008 Sturt v Norwood

Postby G » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:47 pm

MAL it was the only thing that could have stopped St K at that stage because not only was the scoreboard starting to get away from Port but it was the fact that they had hardly touched the Sherrin. The break allowed them to regroup and start afresh.
G
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1676
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:34 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 1st Semi 2008 Sturt v Norwood

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:49 pm

bayman wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:
mal wrote:At least no one has mentioned this
The crowd running onto the ground for CHAMBERS 100 goals cost ST the game
They did when GEHRIG kicked his 100 goals + SK lost to PP in a prelim final

Its purely coincidental what happens after the crowds run onto the ground


All I want to know is why a crowd can discipline itself to stay off the ground after their team wins a Grand Final, and yet they can't resist storming onto the ground like houligans just because someone kicks their 100th goal. It's crap, it's self-induldulgent, it's unnecessary, it's stupid, and a complete waste of everyone's time.



tradition


No, it's not. When I was a lad, people streamed onto the ground after a Grand Final. The authorities wanted it stopped, and they did it. Running onto a ground while a match is in progress is not traditional, it's illegal.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: 1st Semi 2008 Sturt v Norwood

Postby Wedgie » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:49 pm

bayman wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:
mal wrote:At least no one has mentioned this
The crowd running onto the ground for CHAMBERS 100 goals cost ST the game
They did when GEHRIG kicked his 100 goals + SK lost to PP in a prelim final

Its purely coincidental what happens after the crowds run onto the ground


All I want to know is why a crowd can discipline itself to stay off the ground after their team wins a Grand Final, and yet they can't resist storming onto the ground like houligans just because someone kicks their 100th goal. It's crap, it's self-induldulgent, it's unnecessary, it's stupid, and a complete waste of everyone's time.



tradition


BZZZT Wrong!
It was traditional to invade the game after premiership wins and was NOT traditional to invade the oval after someone scores 100 goals.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Qualifying Final Central v Sturt Review Thread

Postby bayman » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:50 pm

whoever the player was that gave away the free when feast was having a shot virtually in the goal square should be planted on the outs for next weeks side, why was sturt trying to save the game rather than win it during the last term ?

as far as glenelg is concerned from my point of view is the game was what we'd hope for hard & tough
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: 1st Semi 2008 Sturt v Norwood

Postby bayman » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:57 pm

Wedgie wrote:
bayman wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:
mal wrote:At least no one has mentioned this
The crowd running onto the ground for CHAMBERS 100 goals cost ST the game
They did when GEHRIG kicked his 100 goals + SK lost to PP in a prelim final

Its purely coincidental what happens after the crowds run onto the ground


All I want to know is why a crowd can discipline itself to stay off the ground after their team wins a Grand Final, and yet they can't resist storming onto the ground like houligans just because someone kicks their 100th goal. It's crap, it's self-induldulgent, it's unnecessary, it's stupid, and a complete waste of everyone's time.



tradition


BZZZT Wrong!
It was traditional to invade the game after premiership wins and was NOT traditional to invade the oval after someone scores 100 goals.


no mate your wrong i recall distinctly running on the ground as a kid when fred phillis kicked his tons & i also know it was done for ken whelan, scott hodges, stephen nicholls & malcolm blight among some others as for the gf yes that was stopped
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: Qualifying Final Central v Sturt Review Thread

Postby smac » Sun Sep 14, 2008 7:59 pm

From 10 minutes into the 3rd, I had a good feeling about the game.

That could be because I had about 14 beers under my belt by then, it could also be because we had started to crank it up by that stage.

A great day at the footy, looking forward to the bays next week.

Tough footballers win games of footy. We had more of them than Sturt did. I wasn't surprised.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13090
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 17 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |