by Booney » Wed May 24, 2006 11:00 am
by am Bays » Wed May 24, 2006 11:04 am
doggies4eva wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:I susppose the most scary thing about these fine examples of human intellegence is their vote has the same value as ours....
Sort of makes a mockery of the one man one vote democracy ethos doesn't it????![]()
I suppose you are advocating a dictatorship headed by your idol Cornsey?
by doggies4eva » Wed May 24, 2006 11:07 am
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:doggies4eva wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:I susppose the most scary thing about these fine examples of human intellegence is their vote has the same value as ours....
Sort of makes a mockery of the one man one vote democracy ethos doesn't it????![]()
I suppose you are advocating a dictatorship headed by your idol Cornsey?
No, just an observation not saying that my observation is correct, history is littered with examples of failed organisations/states that have not adhered to the democracy principle...
by Pseudo » Wed May 24, 2006 11:26 am
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:No, just an observation not saying that my observation is correct, history is littered with examples of failed organisations/states that have not adhered to the democracy principle...
by sus » Wed May 24, 2006 11:50 am
Pseudo wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:No, just an observation not saying that my observation is correct, history is littered with examples of failed organisations/states that have not adhered to the democracy principle...
Arguments against democracy go back as far as Plato - and I have to say I agree with many of them. For every one person who has the intelligence and wisdom to cast a vote properly, there are another 10 people who'd have trouble numbering the boxes from 1 to N, let alone make a rational choice. The signal is lost in the noise.
I've long thought that a voting ballot should come with a quadratic equation. If you don't solve the equation then your vote is informal. That would weed out a lot of the rubbish straight off.
by am Bays » Wed May 24, 2006 12:02 pm
doggies4eva wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:doggies4eva wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:I susppose the most scary thing about these fine examples of human intellegence is their vote has the same value as ours....
Sort of makes a mockery of the one man one vote democracy ethos doesn't it????![]()
I suppose you are advocating a dictatorship headed by your idol Cornsey?
No, just an observation not saying that my observation is correct, history is littered with examples of failed organisations/states that have not adhered to the democracy principle...
Cornes and KG get to vote too you know
by doggies4eva » Wed May 24, 2006 12:12 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:doggies4eva wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:doggies4eva wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:I susppose the most scary thing about these fine examples of human intellegence is their vote has the same value as ours....
Sort of makes a mockery of the one man one vote democracy ethos doesn't it????![]()
I suppose you are advocating a dictatorship headed by your idol Cornsey?
No, just an observation not saying that my observation is correct, history is littered with examples of failed organisations/states that have not adhered to the democracy principle...
Cornes and KG get to vote too you know
Ah yes but KG and God have mastered English 101 (KG only just) and have demonstrated an ability to use words of more than one syllable
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |