by smithy » Wed May 28, 2008 5:12 pm
by Punk Rooster » Wed May 28, 2008 5:20 pm
saintal wrote:TigerBoss wrote:Sampson and Torney should NOT even be considered as replacement for Cahill.
Agree with you on this.
Not sure how many options are open to the club though
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by TigerBoss » Wed May 28, 2008 5:21 pm
by JK » Wed May 28, 2008 5:27 pm
westcoastpanther wrote:locky801 wrote:Time will reveal all no doubt however I really feel for the South supporters, yes I know we all have a go and say that there is only a handful of them but we know there is more than that. How many more years do these totally faithful supporters have to put up with all the crap that they get served up by this footy club, everytime there appears to be some light at the end of that very very long dark tunnel along comes another controversy. How these people remain loyal to their club is beyond me, they as a group deserve better, lets hope for their sake all the wrongs start to disappear and there is a brighter future for the SAFC and to give something for their hard done by supporters to cheer about![]()
It is a pity that their footy club does not have the hard resolve these supporters do
We remain loyal because if we didn't follow South we wouldn't follow SANFL......
by Sojourner » Wed May 28, 2008 5:39 pm
by TigerBoss » Wed May 28, 2008 5:42 pm
by Swooper16 » Wed May 28, 2008 5:46 pm
Sojourner wrote:Ryan Fitzgerald has just had plenty to say on 5AA,
His main points were,
1, Jack did not have the passion required for the club.
2, Fitzy didnt like the fact that Jason Torney came from being coached under Neil Craig to Cahill with coaching methods that were backward and not in the ball park of what Craig was doing.
3, Fitzy felt that Cahill coached in an old fashioned style of "kicking long and straight" and when a coach like Mark Mickan got a five goal lead on him Cahill was unable to produce a second plan to get out of it.
4. Fitzy feels that the club has to appoint someone like Torney or Sampson in order to get someone with the right passion and modern experience for the club to be successfull.
KG pressed him on how much of this was comming from the playing group and he would not answer.
by Big Phil » Wed May 28, 2008 5:48 pm
TigerBoss wrote:Reason 1: South don't need an inexperienced coach to take the reigns, they need someone who has coached before and is a good coach.
Reason 2: Both Torney AND Sampson are TOO close to the playing group. The same criticism applies to Harvey at Freo and Lyon at the Saints...the coaches are not hard enough on their players when they need to be, because they're mates, as well as coach/player.
Reason 3: Surely Torney should concentrate primarily on being a player, given the fact that's what he still is. Sampson and Torney could still be involved as advisors or assistants, but not as head coaches.
Next question...
by Matt the Panther » Wed May 28, 2008 5:52 pm
by MagareyLegend » Wed May 28, 2008 5:59 pm
by Punk Rooster » Wed May 28, 2008 6:05 pm
TigerBoss wrote:Reason 1: South don't need an inexperienced coach to take the reigns, they need someone who has coached before and is a good coach.
TigerBoss wrote:Reason 2: Both Torney AND Sampson are TOO close to the playing group. The same criticism applies to Harvey at Freo and Lyon at the Saints...the coaches are not hard enough on their players when they need to be, because they're mates, as well as coach/player.
There is no reason why Torney could not take on the job & still play.TigerBoss wrote:Reason 3: Surely Torney should concentrate primarily on being a player, given the fact that's what he still is. Sampson and Torney could still be involved as advisors or assistants, but not as head coaches.
Next question...
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Adelaide Hawk » Wed May 28, 2008 6:21 pm
Sojourner wrote:3, Fitzy felt that Cahill coached in an old fashioned style of "kicking long and straight"
by spell_check » Wed May 28, 2008 6:22 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Beat the Eagles?
by Dog_ger » Wed May 28, 2008 6:24 pm
by Punk Rooster » Wed May 28, 2008 6:37 pm
Dog_ger wrote:An SANFL Merger feels close...?
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Matt the Panther » Wed May 28, 2008 6:47 pm
by heater31 » Wed May 28, 2008 6:49 pm
Matt the Panther wrote:According to a statement from Dave Flanaghan on Channel 10 news:
Cahill has resigned as coach, but is considering continuing a new role which will be announced tomorrow.
by Matt the Panther » Wed May 28, 2008 6:49 pm
by Big Phil » Wed May 28, 2008 6:51 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |