Alaska wrote:After watching the State of Origin last night I get the feeling Rugby League has arrived at the right formula as a spectator sport. They have kept the best bits of their game and got rid of the biffo.
AFL is fast loosing the plot in this regard IMHO.
I rarely agree with Choco but I agree with his summation of the Burgoyne incident. AFL has gone too far with taking the good things out of the game: the bump, the high mark, the one on one contests.
I think the Gold Coast and Western Sydney teams will be a huge financial burden on the competition, as if most of the Vic teams aren’t already. The spectators will just not turn up to see the tripe on display at the moment.
I watched the very same event last night and came to a completely different conclusion. I cut my teeth on Rugby League, I have been a Sydney Roosters (Easts) fan since 1975, three years before I started following the Redlegs. My family moved to SA and I soon found out that Australian Football is the better game.
What was marketed as State of Origin last night was in reality no more than a glorified club match and for the very same reason why you appear to be critising the greatest code on earth..a lack of physicality. In reality all that Rugby League has going for it is the physical clash of two rows of huge blokes crunching into each other. Remember this is a sport that calls a 15m run 'Razzle Dazzle'. The biffo WAS State of Origin, the biffo WAS Rugby League. Rugby League without biffo just doesn't work. The reason why they got 64k to the ground last night is because State of Origin represents a genuine rivalry amongst the only two states that actually play the game. Their club games simply do not draw this because Rugby League is a television sport and not a fantastic live spectacle. I know this as I have been to many Rugby League games as well as Football matches and I personally know what I prefer. With League it is important to see more of the bigger picture than you do with OUR code.
Your appraisal of AFL football as it is today in my mind has many inaccuracies. I believe that the Hands in the back rule which was a disaster last season is slowly fading away as an issue in our sport. I think that the 'chopping of the arms' should probably give way. How are the defenders supposed to stop the forwards? I don't agree that the high mark or the bump has been taken out of the play. Brett Burton took an absolute screamer last week and there have been plenty of others as well. What has been taken out of the game is planting your hands in the back while getting a lift. The true aerialists have not been disadvantaged. What is also being taken out of the game is the head high shots. I find the rulings of the MRP as mystifying as you and Choco but to me that looked a reportable offence, even if the penalty was a little too severe. You applaud Rugby League for taking out the biffo but critisise the AFL for attempting to do the same thing. The difference is that with our code their is something else to it.
I also disagreee with your comment about the spectators turning up. The AFL is regularly drawing in record crowds (per season) this decade. The clubs have more members than ever before. I'm not too sure about the West Sydney club either but I think there is room for a Gold Coast team.
Boys, I believe there is a no neck in our midst!
regards,
REB