glenelg.....5/2 ef
sturt.......11/4
wwt........6/1
north......9/1
port.......16/1
norwood...30/1

south.....50/1
not listed west
probably about right seeing the top 3 have got a break on the rest at this stage
by bayman » Sun May 18, 2008 10:02 pm
by Thiele » Sun May 18, 2008 10:07 pm
by am Bays » Sun May 18, 2008 10:10 pm
by bayman » Sun May 18, 2008 10:19 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:FFS we've won one final in 15 years - then only just and we're = flag favourites???
Thortons must know the Bays have a few good punters so are trying to scare them with odds that are unders....
IMO we should be on the same line as Sturt, with Centrals outright favs. No they're not playing well but they don't at this time of year and with key ins to come in Centrals deserve top billing IMO ATM.
by bayman » Sun May 18, 2008 10:23 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:FFS we've won one final in 15 years - then only just and we're = flag favourites???
Thortons must know the Bays have a few good punters so are trying to scare them with odds that are unders....
IMO we should be on the same line as Sturt, with Centrals outright favs. No they're not playing well but they don't at this time of year and with key ins to come in Centrals deserve top billing IMO ATM.
by am Bays » Sun May 18, 2008 10:29 pm
bayman wrote:tassie, they are doing markets on form for this years flag with this years form, what has happened in the past whether it was 5,10 or 100 years ago means nothing to this year![]()
by zipzap » Sun May 18, 2008 10:49 pm
by spell_check » Sun May 18, 2008 10:56 pm
zipzap wrote:The Bays are the real deal for sure. They totally deserve their position as flag favourites. Congratulations to the supporters, administrators, players and coaching staff at GFC for a job well done. Enjoy your success everyone, WELL DONE!![]()
![]()
by topsywaldron » Sun May 18, 2008 11:01 pm
zipzap wrote:Congratulations to the administrators
by Dutchy » Sun May 18, 2008 11:08 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Thortons must know the Bays have a few good punters so are trying to scare them with odds that are unders....
by zipzap » Sun May 18, 2008 11:26 pm
spell_check wrote:zipzap wrote:The Bays are the real deal for sure. They totally deserve their position as flag favourites. Congratulations to the supporters, administrators, players and coaching staff at GFC for a job well done. Enjoy your success everyone, WELL DONE!![]()
![]()
This is the "put the mockers on" tactic, eh?
by spell_check » Sun May 18, 2008 11:30 pm
zipzap wrote:spell_check wrote:zipzap wrote:The Bays are the real deal for sure. They totally deserve their position as flag favourites. Congratulations to the supporters, administrators, players and coaching staff at GFC for a job well done. Enjoy your success everyone, WELL DONE!![]()
![]()
This is the "put the mockers on" tactic, eh?
You're so cynical Spelly!
by zipzap » Mon May 19, 2008 12:03 am
spell_check wrote:zipzap wrote:spell_check wrote:zipzap wrote:The Bays are the real deal for sure. They totally deserve their position as flag favourites. Congratulations to the supporters, administrators, players and coaching staff at GFC for a job well done. Enjoy your success everyone, WELL DONE!![]()
![]()
This is the "put the mockers on" tactic, eh?
You're so cynical Spelly!
Reckon it will work?
by am Bays » Mon May 19, 2008 12:21 am
by eyeofthetiger » Mon May 19, 2008 1:45 am
topsywaldron wrote:zipzap wrote:Congratulations to the administrators
Whatever did happen to Valley Virgin? Glenelg win a few games and all of a sudden Chandler's a genius?
Amazing what you can do when you give the critics a few 'jobs' around the place to keep them quiet.
by Dog_ger » Mon May 19, 2008 3:43 am
by sturtpeter » Mon May 19, 2008 5:56 pm
by SnappyTom » Mon May 19, 2008 6:10 pm
bayman wrote:central.....5/2 ef
glenelg.....5/2 ef
sturt.......11/4
wwt........6/1
north......9/1
port.......16/1
norwood...30/1![]()
south.....50/1
not listed west
probably about right seeing the top 3 have got a break on the rest at this stage
by Dutchy » Mon May 19, 2008 6:14 pm
by Ecky » Mon May 19, 2008 6:16 pm
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |