Richmond

Talk on the national game

Richmond

Postby NFC » Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:25 pm

Should take a bow today, didn't get the four points but my word they played well and gave it their all. Looked like it could blow out there in the third quarter but due to some great play from Brown and Richo, they got back into the contest and actually hit the lead. I thought they would be competing for the spoon again this year but they're better than that.

Their forward line is actually pretty good with Richo, Brown, Morton and the developing Riewoldt. They have developed some good young key defenders in Thursfield and McGuane and they have some high draft picks making their way in the midfield. I think their future is a lot brighter than people gave them credit for.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Richmond

Postby brod » Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:36 pm

They did have 20 less inside 50 entries than the Hawks. The poor kicking for goal, missing so many shots that AFL players need to kick is what kept the Tigers in the game. I know the "bad kick is bad football" saying, but I think the Hawks did it to themselves today, not so much the Tigers.
Obviously to be that close and have 20 less in side 50s is good, but they also had 26 more possesions. So to have that many less inside 50's is VERY POOR.
User avatar
brod
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19193
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: Willaston
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 27 times

Re: Richmond

Postby Brad » Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:50 pm

We were OK, but never before and during the game did I think we would win, Hawks should have won by more, but bad kicking is bad footy. Finally we are playing the young guys and getting rid of dead wood that hasn't got us anywhere in 7 years.
Brad
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1795
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:33 pm
Location: Ceduna
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: Crystal Brook

Re: Richmond

Postby gadj1976 » Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:51 pm

For intensity, that was the best game I've seen this season. Great game, glad that Richmond are starting to look like they're capable of mounting a challenge to the top 8 teams.
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9347
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has liked: 825 times
Been liked: 898 times

Re: Richmond

Postby Rik E Boy » Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:01 pm

Richmond have improved but Hawthorn should have buried them. St Kilda will shut them down next week.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28588
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Richmond

Postby seaess » Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:23 pm

we'll see, when the tigers play positive footy they haveproved they can match it with the best
seaess
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:58 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Richmond

Postby hearts on fire » Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:12 pm

Richmond are a very average team and won't make the finals this year.

In a couple of years time they may make the finals but not at this stage.
~ R.I.P John McCarthy, 19-11-1989 - 9-9-2012 ~
User avatar
hearts on fire
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7104
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:02 pm
Location: naked
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ingle Farm

Re: Richmond

Postby Dutchy » Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:26 pm

Richmond are still Richmond...ordinary
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46253
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2648 times
Been liked: 4316 times

Re: Richmond

Postby Hondo » Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:37 pm

Its been too long IMO for the club to be the gunners of the comp ... always gonna do something soon

Over the last 20 years every other club has at least been able to string a few good seasons together ... except for Freo :shock: In fact in that time 11 of the current 16 clubs have won a premiership. Exceptions = Richmond, Saints, Bulldogs, Freo and Melbourne

I am sure its too little too late for Wallace - but credit where it's due there looks to be some improvement this season whether or not they will be knocking on the door of the 8 well I'm not convinced.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Richmond

Postby Dutchy » Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:39 pm

Didnt they lose today?
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46253
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2648 times
Been liked: 4316 times

Re: Richmond

Postby Footy Chick » Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:01 pm

When Richmond are no longer a part of the AFL is the day I'll start doing AFL tipping again..they've been screwing me* for years :(
User avatar
Footy Chick
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 26904
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:44 pm
Location: anywhere I want to be...
Has liked: 1767 times
Been liked: 2191 times

Re: Richmond

Postby smithy » Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:08 pm

Dutchy wrote:Richmond are still Richmond...ordinary


Which begs the question Dutchy.....
Why do people always say North Melb when it comes to relocating and/or folding but Richmond and Melbourne rarely rate a mention despite poorer recent results.
Would be interesting to compare the 3 clubs records since 1960.
smithy
 

Re: Richmond

Postby McAlmanac » Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:17 am

smithy wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Richmond are still Richmond...ordinary


Which begs the question Dutchy.....
Why do people always say North Melb when it comes to relocating and/or folding but Richmond and Melbourne rarely rate a mention despite poorer recent results.
Would be interesting to compare the 3 clubs records since 1960.

Richmond have a constituency; Melbourne on the other hand....
Blighty Teasdale - SuperCoach former World No. 1
User avatar
McAlmanac
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:29 am
Location: Baseball Ground
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: Richmond

Postby McAlmanac » Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:26 am

hearts on fire wrote:Richmond are a very average team and won't make the finals this year.

In a couple of years time they may make the finals but not at this stage.

In a couple of years.... I bet you can't tip what might happen in a couple of weeks.

Richmond's top end draft picks make no progress:

Deledio - where's he going?
Tambling - ditto.
Riewoldt - a work in........ ........ progress......

Check out Terry Wallace's win/loss ratio since 2000. Terry Wallace has taken a lot of money from AFL clubs for very little result in the last nine years.
Blighty Teasdale - SuperCoach former World No. 1
User avatar
McAlmanac
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:29 am
Location: Baseball Ground
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: Richmond

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:31 am

seaess wrote:we'll see, when the tigers play positive footy they haveproved they can match it with the best


Hawthorn kicked a zillion behinds. That margin was extremely flattering. I don't mind the way the Tigers play but the only thing they have proven is that have improved.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28588
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Richmond

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:34 am

smithy wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Richmond are still Richmond...ordinary


Which begs the question Dutchy.....
Why do people always say North Melb when it comes to relocating and/or folding but Richmond and Melbourne rarely rate a mention despite poorer recent results.
Would be interesting to compare the 3 clubs records since 1960.


In terms of on field performance Richmond is the worst performed side of the last 25 years but that doesn't stop the mad buggers from turning up every week. Last year they averaged 40k a game despite not being able to win a chook raffle. It's all about bums on seats smithy.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28588
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Richmond

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Apr 28, 2008 8:37 am

McAlmanac wrote:
Deledio - where's he going?
Tambling - ditto.
Riewoldt - a work in........ ........ progress......



I thought all of these guys did really well yesterday. Deledio got a lot of the footy and Tambling has made real progress this season. He appears to be working much harder at the moment. Jack Riewoldt is only in his second season so a bit of an early call there Mac..well, it was sort of a call. :)

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28588
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Richmond

Postby rod_rooster » Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:23 am

seaess wrote:we'll see, when the tigers play positive footy they haveproved they can match it with the best


The only thing Richmond proved is that the Hawks have a fair way to go before they should be talking about challenging Geelong.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Richmond

Postby Dirko » Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:27 am

All I hope is Richmond finish 9th...again :lol:
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Richmond

Postby Hondo » Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:06 am

rod_rooster wrote:
seaess wrote:we'll see, when the tigers play positive footy they haveproved they can match it with the best


The only thing Richmond proved is that the Hawks have a fair way to go before they should be talking about challenging Geelong.


Don't know about that - "some way" to go maybe, but not a "fair way"

Geelong are great no question, but if you are going to take one performance against a lowly side and use it to judge where a team is at then what about the Cats only winning by 1 point against Freo?
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Next

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |