by Ian » Sat Apr 19, 2008 7:16 am
by Rik E Boy » Sat Apr 19, 2008 8:26 am
by McAlmanac » Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:22 am
by Aerie » Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:41 pm
McAlmanac wrote:Didn't read Cornes' article, but the Victorian players play for their jumper, while the others play for....????
by Hondo » Sat Apr 19, 2008 3:06 pm
Aerie wrote:McAlmanac wrote:Didn't read Cornes' article, but the Victorian players play for their jumper, while the others play for....????
That's the problem. It's a case of one team playing for the jumper and the other playing against the jumper.
by locky801 » Sat Apr 19, 2008 4:05 pm
Ian wrote:It's not too often I agree with Cornes, but theres not too much I could argue against in this article.
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,23563713-5006301,00.html
by Mr66 » Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:20 pm
McAlmanac wrote:Didn't read Cornes' article, but the Victorian players play for their jumper, while the others play for....????
by Sojourner » Sat Apr 19, 2008 10:55 pm
by MightyEagles » Sun Apr 20, 2008 12:42 pm
hondo71 wrote:Aerie wrote:McAlmanac wrote:Didn't read Cornes' article, but the Victorian players play for their jumper, while the others play for....????
That's the problem. It's a case of one team playing for the jumper and the other playing against the jumper.
That's it in a nut-shell lads IMO - that's why they chose this concept
The AFL want us Victorians to support their team, and they want everyone else to want to nail the Vics! That's my read on the game's marketing so far anyway.
I am coming around to it all, I think we all just need to give it a go and then make our judgements afterwards. I bet 99% of those saying they aren't interested in it, will sneak a peak anyway!
How often do we get to see the best 44 players in the game playing in 1 match ... give it a go!
by JK » Sun Apr 20, 2008 12:53 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:58 am
by Strawb » Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:53 am
by Royal City » Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:08 pm
by Hondo » Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:02 am
Royal City wrote:Wasnt a SA vs Victoria game proposed. But had to be scrapped because the Power and Crows complained they would have to provide most of the players.?????
Which is pretty poor form IMHO.
They have robbed sa football followers of watching its state team . All because a Goodwin/Tredders may hurt a big toe and miss a minor round match.
by evans01 » Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:44 am
by rod_rooster » Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:10 am
evans01 wrote:i really dont see the point of the whole thing?.......
its either a proper state of origin or its nothing at all.....
only plus is to see so many quality players at one time......hopefully they give it 100%.....
by Royal City » Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:04 pm
hondo71 wrote:Royal City wrote:Wasnt a SA vs Victoria game proposed. But had to be scrapped because the Power and Crows complained they would have to provide most of the players.?????
Which is pretty poor form IMHO.
They have robbed sa football followers of watching its state team . All because a Goodwin/Tredders may hurt a big toe and miss a minor round match.
The SA teams and the WA teams voted against it because of the load from both their clubs - a mock-up SA SOO team done last year had 17 Crows or Power players in it.
However, I don't think they were the only clubs against the concept plus the AFL had an agenda to involve all states without playing a massive carnival as they only had 1 weekend spare.
So Power and Crows contributed but I don't think they can be held responsible 100% for the end result
by GWW » Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:07 am
by McAlmanac » Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:54 am
by Benchwarmer » Thu May 01, 2008 2:17 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |