mighty_tiger_79 wrote:sturt will be new flag favs after such an impressive outing
Thats inappropriate!

by GWW » Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:43 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:sturt will be new flag favs after such an impressive outing
by therisingblues » Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:47 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:sturt will be new flag favs after such an impressive outing
by bayman » Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:52 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:59 am
therisingblues wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:sturt will be new flag favs after such an impressive outing
Nay, I disagree MT79.
Apparently Glenelg experimented with only 2 blokes in the center all game and they wore clown shoes throughout the final quarter.
I won't be reading too much in to this result.
by Blue Boy » Fri Mar 21, 2008 1:56 am
by Blue Boy » Fri Mar 21, 2008 1:57 am
by therisingblues » Fri Mar 21, 2008 2:26 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:therisingblues wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:sturt will be new flag favs after such an impressive outing
Nay, I disagree MT79.
Apparently Glenelg experimented with only 2 blokes in the center all game and they wore clown shoes throughout the final quarter.
I won't be reading too much in to this result.
i was just gettin in before STURTPETER
by Jimmy » Fri Mar 21, 2008 4:26 am
stampy wrote:sturtpeter wrote:Will try to contact Troy Burge on 1197am, Rph adelaide with the half-time scores.
I agree Glenelg fans. All that really matters is the game's played in true fair spirit and neither team suffers any serious injuries.
Round 5 Sat April 26th. at home is the most important to obtain the valuable 2 Points![]()
![]()
![]()
hopefully this game will be moved to adelaide oval
by Jimmy » Fri Mar 21, 2008 4:28 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:sturt will be new flag favs after such an impressive outing
by Jimmy » Fri Mar 21, 2008 4:33 am
bayman wrote:r.kirkby was reported late in the last term, i don't think he'll have too much to worry about, i was happy with what i saw apart from the kicking at goal, from memory with the aid of a 3 goal breeze glenelg kicked 2.8.20 to sturt 3.0.18 in the first term, i thought chambers looked as good as he did last year, but perrie was only rarely sighted through the night, for glenelg most of our good players played a half to 3/4's of the game & they are the 'usual suspects'
by am Bays » Fri Mar 21, 2008 7:45 am
Jimmy wrote:bayman wrote:r.kirkby was reported late in the last term, i don't think he'll have too much to worry about, i was happy with what i saw apart from the kicking at goal, from memory with the aid of a 3 goal breeze glenelg kicked 2.8.20 to sturt 3.0.18 in the first term, i thought chambers looked as good as he did last year, but perrie was only rarely sighted through the night, for glenelg most of our good players played a half to 3/4's of the game & they are the 'usual suspects'
I always love posts like these....
'....most of our good players were rested...'
gotta love the excuses for losing a trial game LOL!!!!!!!
FFS, its only a trial, even before it started you said you didnt care...now you come out with the excuses!!!
by zipzap » Fri Mar 21, 2008 8:44 am
GWW wrote:This huge game is going to be telecast Australia wide isn't it??
by zipzap » Fri Mar 21, 2008 8:49 am
bayman wrote: perrie was only rarely sighted through the night
by Rucciangelo » Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:19 am
Mr T wrote: i was just gettin in before STURTPETER
by bayman » Fri Mar 21, 2008 11:46 am
zipzap wrote:bayman wrote: perrie was only rarely sighted through the night
Well it was pretty dark, almost as bad as the Parade. But if you didn't see Sarge do lots of strong stuff up forward, including a couple of goals, you weren't looking hard enough
by bayman » Fri Mar 21, 2008 11:53 am
Jimmy wrote:bayman wrote:r.kirkby was reported late in the last term, i don't think he'll have too much to worry about, i was happy with what i saw apart from the kicking at goal, from memory with the aid of a 3 goal breeze glenelg kicked 2.8.20 to sturt 3.0.18 in the first term, i thought chambers looked as good as he did last year, but perrie was only rarely sighted through the night, for glenelg most of our good players played a half to 3/4's of the game & they are the 'usual suspects'
I always love posts like these....
'....most of our good players were rested...'
gotta love the excuses for losing a trial game LOL!!!!!!!
FFS, its only a trial, even before it started you said you didnt care...now you come out with the excuses!!!
by sturtpeter » Fri Mar 21, 2008 1:57 pm
by Jimmy » Fri Mar 21, 2008 2:15 pm
bayman wrote:Jimmy wrote:bayman wrote:r.kirkby was reported late in the last term, i don't think he'll have too much to worry about, i was happy with what i saw apart from the kicking at goal, from memory with the aid of a 3 goal breeze glenelg kicked 2.8.20 to sturt 3.0.18 in the first term, i thought chambers looked as good as he did last year, but perrie was only rarely sighted through the night, for glenelg most of our good players played a half to 3/4's of the game & they are the 'usual suspects'
I always love posts like these....
'....most of our good players were rested...'
gotta love the excuses for losing a trial game LOL!!!!!!!
FFS, its only a trial, even before it started you said you didnt care...now you come out with the excuses!!!
all i did was give a brief summary to what i saw & yes sturt rested players as well & some didn't even play, it isn't any excuse, & what i said before is correct who cares who wins/loses trial games, i believe you went fishing & i bit back, but at least unlike sturt1, i like you stay on line win lose or draw when important games are played, & if you don't want my summary of what i saw just tell me & i'll go hiding like sturt1 as well ffs
by stampy » Fri Mar 21, 2008 2:59 pm
by gonzo » Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:02 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |