 by spell_check » Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:40 pm
by spell_check » Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:40 pm 
 
 
                
                 by brod » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:05 pm
by brod » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:05 pm 
 by Ian » Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:48 am
by Ian » Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:48 am 

 by FattyLumpkin » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:04 pm
by FattyLumpkin » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:04 pm 
 
 
                
                 
                
                 by spell_check » Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:29 pm
by spell_check » Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:29 pm 
FattyLumpkin wrote:What is the lowest cumulative score of a club winning all 4 grades??
 
 
                
                 by FattyLumpkin » Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:13 pm
by FattyLumpkin » Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:13 pm 
 
 
                
                 
                
                 by spell_check » Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:24 pm
by spell_check » Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:24 pm 
FattyLumpkin wrote:no Spelly, I meant lowest total (goals & behinds) - eg. League may have kicked 6-15 but won. B's 4-12 & won etc.
So rather than a huge cummulative score by all 4 grades, I'm looking for a small one (but at the same time - all 4 grades winning)
 
 
                
                 by spell_check » Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:34 pm
by spell_check » Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:34 pm 
 
 
                
                 by Ian » Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:24 pm
by Ian » Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:24 pm 
spell_check wrote:The lowest total margin for a team to win all four grades in a round is 12 points:
Round 17 1981:
South vs North
League: 15.10 vs 13.21 - 1 pt 25 shots to 34
Reserves: 21.6 vs 18.20 - 4 pts 27 shots to 38
19s: 11.11 vs 9.17 - 6 pts 22 shots to 26
17s: 6.3 vs 6.2 - 1 pt 9 shots to 8

 by spell_check » Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:21 pm
by spell_check » Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:21 pm 
spell_check wrote:FattyLumpkin wrote:What is the lowest cumulative score of a club winning all 4 grades??
Between 1979 and 1990, Woodville had all four grades win in the same round once.
 
 
                
                 by FattyLumpkin » Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:25 am
by FattyLumpkin » Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:25 am 
spell_check wrote:FattyLumpkin wrote:no Spelly, I meant lowest total (goals & behinds) - eg. League may have kicked 6-15 but won. B's 4-12 & won etc.
So rather than a huge cummulative score by all 4 grades, I'm looking for a small one (but at the same time - all 4 grades winning)
Norwood in Round 19 1995 had all four teams win, but only kicked a combined total of 26.27 (183). Centrals four grades only scored 12.15 (87), also a record.
League: 10.5 vs 5.7
Reserves: 10.9 vs 5.2
19s: 5.11 vs 1.5
17s: 1.2 vs 1.1
 
 
                
                 
                
                 by spell_check » Mon Feb 04, 2008 8:29 pm
by spell_check » Mon Feb 04, 2008 8:29 pm 
FattyLumpkin wrote:spell_check wrote:FattyLumpkin wrote:no Spelly, I meant lowest total (goals & behinds) - eg. League may have kicked 6-15 but won. B's 4-12 & won etc.
So rather than a huge cummulative score by all 4 grades, I'm looking for a small one (but at the same time - all 4 grades winning)
Norwood in Round 19 1995 had all four teams win, but only kicked a combined total of 26.27 (183). Centrals four grades only scored 12.15 (87), also a record.
League: 10.5 vs 5.7
Reserves: 10.9 vs 5.2
19s: 5.11 vs 1.5
17s: 1.2 vs 1.1
OK Spelly - a tough one. Who were the goal kickers for both teams in the U17's, and did either of them go onto play League?

 
 
                
                 Football
 Football  SANFL History Forum
 SANFL History Forum
	
	
                                                        Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |
                                                        

