by DOC » Thu Apr 23, 2026 3:42 pm
Just watched Chris Scott’s presser specifically about Tyson Stengle, and I found myself saying bullshit.
He was saying he did not know when he would return and that he is not across those type of things.
“ I don’t have a problem with the media speculating, but they are speculating with less information than I have — and I have less information than other people at the club have, who probably have less information than the AFL have,” Scott told journalists at Kardinia Park when questioned on Stengle.”
I then read Fox Footy story regarding it and it happens that he may be telling the actual truth, because if a player fails a drug test then he CANNOT be told,
“” What we just saw there (from Scott), and I think not accidentally, was the illustration of the absurdity of the AFL’s Illicit Drug Policy as it relates to senior coaches,” Whateley said.
“That policy was unveiled last month, and it includes a clause that there’s a $250,000 fine should a senior coach be brought into the loop on the specific information on the breach of the Illicit Drugs (Policy). The changes were the president, the footy manager and CEO can know — and we know that the club doctor and psychologist are the point figures.”
I can’t imagine he wouldn’t know, unless the Footy Manager and the CEO are morons but he can’t say he knows as they will be fined.
“But, if the senior coach is brought into that loop, it comes with a quarter of a million dollar fine. I’m told there was guffawing in the briefing when that was unveiled. I think Ken Hinkley described it best as being ‘typical’, the AFL’s attitude towards senior coaches.
“He said it was ‘crazy’ that players come to their senior coaches for everything, and there’s nothing a coach wouldn’t do to help his player. But, when it comes to potentially the biggest crisis in a player’s life, the coach is specifically excluded.
“What would’ve been interesting today, is if Chris Scott had sat there and illustrated that he did know precisely what was going on with Tyson Stengle, would that have left Geelong open to a quarter of a million dollar fine?”